Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring

Rick Decker <rdecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

You missed my point. Until recently I thought that it was James'
narcisism that motivated his jaw-dropping refusal to see that
there was nothing new in his prime-counting function. Now, though,
I have come to the view that he's lacking an important faculty
that all mathematicians have. It's pitiful, really.

You mean that his brain is wired differently?

Yeah, what a novel claim *that* is.

--
Jesse F. Hughes
"But you probably aren't a person with the ability to make any kind of
checks for yourself. But you do talk a lot in posts on Usenet where
you probably live out some fantasy." --James S. Harris is funning, no?
.