Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring



Jesse F. Hughes wrote:

Rick Decker <rdecker@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:


You missed my point. Until recently I thought that it was James'
narcisism that motivated his jaw-dropping refusal to see that
there was nothing new in his prime-counting function. Now, though,
I have come to the view that he's lacking an important faculty
that all mathematicians have. It's pitiful, really.


You mean that his brain is wired differently?

Yeah, what a novel claim *that* is.

Geez! Tough room. Okay, I give up. :-)


Regards,

Rick

.

Relevant Pages

  • Free to be you and me. Hee hee.
    ... You're as arbitrary and capricious as Jesse F. Hughes. ... Or perhaps you do not care for my approach to harrassing James Harris ... and Quinn Tyler Jackson. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Here are the answerds J.J.H. expected
    ... Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... Meister rührt sich und Geselle ... In der Freiheit heilgem Schutz. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: The ultimate luxury ?
    ... > jesse@phiwumbda.org (Jesse F. Hughes) wrote: ... The distinction isn't particularly useful to me. ... >>about what terms programmers in the field use. ... Jesse F. Hughes ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Attacking my algebraic integer work
    ... Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... have proved a false statement, the details of his proof are ... Ozymandias, King of Kings. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel Theory Of Sets
    ... Jesse F. Hughes wrote: ... >> some sense more self contained in set theory is the one given by Abian ... >> Abian says.Then Abian calls an axiom, ...
    (sci.math)