Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- From: David C. Ullrich <ullrich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 06:33:07 -0500
On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 13:44:23 -0400, Hatto von Aquitanien
<abbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I suspect the answer to this may be 'Yes.', 'No.', and 'It depends.'. I
have never felt satisfactorily convinced that the transition from the
Riemann sum approximation to a smooth curve is logically founded upon
axioms I have assumed at the outset. These axioms are those of formal
logic and those of Euclid.
Well, those are not the axioms that are used in the
standard approach to a rigorous treatment of calculus.
When using a geometric argument to justify the
transition from the chord-length approximation to a continuous curve - for
example in the typical proof of the arclength theorem - there seems to be
an unacknowledged step of faith.
Is this a subject which has been discussed in mathematics?
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- References:
- Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- Prev by Date: Re: Funny wrong proofs
- Next by Date: Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- Previous by thread: Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- Next by thread: Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading