Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asupprimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 19:29:47 +0200
The World Wide Wade a écrit :
In article <1149925147.272877.32240@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"denis feldmann" <denis_feldmann@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
The World Wide Wade wrote:In articleThanks a lot. Are you the author of this construction
<waderameyxiii-45674F.23201008062006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
The World Wide Wade <waderameyxiii@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <4488be04$0$7763$7a628cd7@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,Here I should have said that below the x_axis, F(z) = e^z, where
Denis Feldmann <denis.feldmann.asupprimer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I am looking for a smooth surjection of R^2 onto itself, not bijective,Let f be any smooth function on R such that f(y) = 0 if y <= 0,
with jacobian everywhere not zero. My best example so far is an
holomorphic function (with the obvious isomorphism between C and R^2)
like the antiderivative of exp(z^2) (which is surjective by Picard
theorem), but I would like something simpler, more explicit, and where
the proof of surjectivity uses only elementary calculations...
f' <= 0 on [0,Pi], f' >= 0 on [Pi,2Pi], f(2Pi) < 0, and f(y) =
f(2Pi) for y >= 2Pi. Writing z = x + iy, define F(z) = e^z +
f(y). Then the Jacobian of F at x + iy is e^(2x) -
e^x*sin(y)*f'(y), which = 0 iff e^x = sin(y)*f'(y). The right
hand side is always <= 0, so the equation cannot be satisfied.
Therefore the Jacobian of F is never 0. F is surjective because
below the x-axis it maps onto C \ {0},
it maps many to one onto C \ {0}.
and on the line y = 2Pi itAnd finally, F is not a bijection because of its behavior below
is the function e^x + f(2Pi); because f(2Pi) < 0, this function
takes on the value 0.
the x-axis.
Yes.
Thanks again. Of course, this has many merits, but one of those was to guide us towards a completely explicit (C-infinite) function, namely
F(x,y)= (sin(y)(e^x - 1/2), -cos(y) e^x) . I will try to give proper credits to it if we happen to publish it (in a course for French teachers)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- References:
- Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: denis feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Prev by Date: Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Next by Date: Re: book or online page on factoring...
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|