Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph)
- Date: 11 Jun 2006 08:11:49 -0400
I wrote:
....
As before, identify R^2 with C, and let p(z)=z^3-3z. Then p is a
3-sheeted irregular branched cover of C over C, with critical points
1 and -1, and critical values -2 = p(1) = p(-2) and 2 = p(-1) = p(2).
The preimage p^{-1}(R), call it G, is the union of R and two (real)
parabolas
which is of course wrong--with z = x+iy as usual, G is the zero-set
of y(3x^2-y^2-1), so it's the union of R and the two branches of a
*hyperbola*.
Lee Rudolph
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- References:
- Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: denis feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Denis Feldmann
- Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Prev by Date: Re: Provinf bounded variation
- Next by Date: Re: Another Reason Why Feinstein's Proof is Incorrect
- Previous by thread: Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Next by thread: Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2
- Index(es):