Re: Murder in the name of the rose
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 16:25:36 +0000 (UTC)
In article <4f4skiF1hf1tvU1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Carlos_Santos?= <jcsantos@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
jt64@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Would any organisation other than religious murder to supress
mathematical information?
If so who and why?
I wouldn't exclude the possibility of a government murdering someone who
might be able to find a way to break their cryptographic codes.
If "the way" is the good old rubber hose cryptoanalysis[1], then
perhaps. But if "the way" means that someone found a way to break them
analytically (think Rejewski, Turing, et al with ENIGMA, or Friedman
et al with PURPLE), then I find it hard to believe. Mostly, because
such a murder would not make the system secure.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[1] I.e., beating up someone who has the key in order to obtain the key.
.
- References:
- Murder in the name of the rose
- From: jt64
- Re: Murder in the name of the rose
- From: José Carlos Santos
- Murder in the name of the rose
- Prev by Date: Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a
- Next by Date: Re: Need an an example of a function
- Previous by thread: Re: Murder in the name of the rose
- Next by thread: Re: Murder in the name of the rose
- Index(es):