Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien <abbot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:06:40 -0400
Lot-o-fun wrote:
I find it hard to believe that you actually believe what you are
saying. You have hosts of mathematicians telling you what the common
usage of various words are, and you simply refuse to believe them.
So, given a proposition which I determine proved by self-evidence, what
shall I call it?
--
Nil conscire sibi
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- References:
- Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: The Last Danish Pastry
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- From: Lot-o-fun
- Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- Prev by Date: Re: So What's a Determinant?
- Next by Date: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring
- Previous by thread: Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- Next by thread: Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|