Re: subseries
- From: Ken Pledger <ken.pledger@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 08:58:11 +1200
In article <1150861704.066432.184200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Mike" <matmzc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
....^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
By the way, your book's definition is unnecessarily redundant....
and, indeed, excessively superfluous. :-)
Ken Pledger.
.
- References:
- subseries
- From: MR
- Re: subseries
- From: Mike
- subseries
- Prev by Date: Re: Even more tensor trouble
- Next by Date: Re: distributive property proof
- Previous by thread: Re: subseries
- Next by thread: Re: subseries, correction to previous
- Index(es):
