sci.math

• Date Index

---

• n! + 1 = k^2, Earle Jones
• The set-theoretic platinum standard, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: The set-theoretic platinum standard, Herman Rubin
    • Re: The set-theoretic platinum standard, Gene Ward Smith
• Common tangents, -marko-
• Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio
  • Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio
      • Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, Kurio
      • Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Uniform continuity and analyticity over the reals, The World Wide Wade
• Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?, Gene Ward Smith
• Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, Christopher J. Henrich
  • Re: Unique Alternating Multilinear D:R^n->R, HopfZ
• Functional series+3^n, eugene
• Limit+fractional part, eugene
  • Re: Limit+fractional part, A N Niel
    • Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, eugene
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Limit+fractional part, The World Wide Wade
• SVD, m . mashoof
  • Re: SVD, Ray Koopman
• New arithmetic function, bouayoun
  • Re: New arithmetic function, BuddhaThu
  • Re: New arithmetic function, Patrick Coilland
• What annoys you in mathematical text?, Toni Lassila
  • Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, N. Silver
  • Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, HopfZ
    • Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?, David R Tribble
• From the free iPod people..., GratefulHead
• topology with norm space., mina_world
  • Re: topology with norm space., José Carlos Santos
• analysis with sup., mina_world
  • Re: analysis with sup., G.E. Ivey
    • Re: analysis with sup., mina_world
• A problem in fitting curve, Yu Bo
  • Re: A problem in fitting curve, matt271829-news
    • Re: A problem in fitting curve, makc . the . great
      • Re: A problem in fitting curve, makc . the . great
  • Re: A problem in fitting curve, Ray Koopman
• irreducible polynomial+connectedness, eugene
• Range of Function, Simon Dean
  • Re: Range of Function, William Elliot
    • Re: Range of Function, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Range of Function, Parikshit Shah
  • Re: Range of Function, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Range of Function, Michel Hack
• Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mathematical formula to compare integer sequence, Rob Pratt
• help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., len
  • Re: help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., Gene Ward Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • help with an integral which looks similar to elliptic integrals., len
• A question on a cyclotomic prime number, genkisaito@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Adjacency Matrix, yelena13
  • Re: Adjacency Matrix, Robert Israel
• Need help in evaluating, ahoyaho
  • Re: Need help in evaluating, mathman
    • Re: Need help in evaluating, ahoyaho
  • Re: Need help in evaluating, The World Wide Wade
• function space cardinality, Robert Sheskey
  • Re: function space cardinality, The World Wide Wade
• I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Pious Audio
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Gene Wagenbreth
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, amzoti
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, matt271829-news
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, bill
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, William Elliot
  • Re: I don't know why I'm getting the correct answer, The Qurqirish Dragon
• Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart
  • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Robert Israel
    • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart
      • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart
      • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart
  • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Bart
  • Re: Maclaurin series of (sin(pi*x))^q, Herman Rubin
• sequence of continuous functions, Amanda
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, eugene
  • Re: sequence of continuous functions, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: sequence of continuous functions, eugene
• Re: Recommended way to relearn math?, Herb Martin
• rounding question, slifedt
  • Re: rounding question, Jonathan Cass
  • Re: rounding question, Patrick FitzGerald
• # {x from G : x^n = e}, eugene
  • Re: # {x from G : x^n = e}, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: # {x from G : x^n = e}, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1)-, The World Wide Wade
• The number of polynomials, Aloha Kakuikanu
• Re: Much more simple ?, Roman B. Binder
• Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea is crap, Roman B. Binder
• Re: right ordered set structure, cbrown
  • Re: right ordered set structure, William Elliot
• integral, Bart
  • Re: integral, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: integral, Bart
    • Re: integral, Bart
      • Re: integral, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: integral, Bart
  • Re: integral, Robert Israel
    • Re: integral, Bart
      • Re: integral, G. A. Edgar
• Extensions of Curves, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Extensions of Curves, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Extensions of Curves, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Extensions of Curves, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Extensions of Curves, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Extensions of Curves, The World Wide Wade
• Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hyped
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Larry Deack
    • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hyped
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, bert
    • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news
      • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Tom
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Hugo Pfoertner
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, BuddhaThu
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Michael Orion
    • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, Doug Goncz
      • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, bert
      • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news
      • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, matt271829-news
  • Re: Maximum number of small spheres that can surround a large sphere, jon
• Re: Tensor Inverse?, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Tensor Inverse?, Hauke Reddmann
    • Re: Tensor Inverse?, Timothy Murphy
• can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Pious Audio
  • Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, A N Niel
  • Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: can someone confirm that I'm doing this correctly?, Pious Audio
• Re: uniformly converge with z., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: uniformly converge with z., mina_world
• Re: perpetuum mobile success story, Dan
• Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Martin
  • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Martin
  • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Axel Vogt
  • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Something not computing in Langs Algebra, Arturo Magidin
• Eigen vector calculation, Shailesh
  • Re: Eigen vector calculation, Ian Parker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Eigen Vector Calculation, Shailesh
• Re: is there an efficient algorithm for switching representation base?, apc
• functions in set theory, Jose Capco
  • Re: functions in set theory, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco
      • Re: functions in set theory, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco
      • Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco
  • Re: functions in set theory, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: functions in set theory, Jose Capco
• Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, sumarjaya
  • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, bassam king karzeddin
  • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, sumarjaya
      • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Halmos' paper on writing mathematics, Ken Pledger
• parametrized x & y question., tamiry
  • Re: parametrized x & y question., Michael Jørgensen
• qustion about terminology., mina_world
  • Re: qustion about terminology., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: qustion about terminology., Lee Rudolph
• Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Bertie Reed
      • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Cardinals of fields (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Gene Ward Smith
• SeDuMi - predector, Ismail
• Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene
  • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene
      • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, Robert Low
      • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene
      • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, eugene
      • Re: Vector space or ot's orthogonal, The World Wide Wade
• Re: Skewed Variances, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Skewed Variances, Robert Israel
• AHP(Analytic Hierarchy Process), pramodh
• Index vs. Average, Protoman
  • Re: Index vs. Average, Rod
• Commutative Algebra, wcdtd
• Re: variety ?, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: variety ?, Fedor
• Re: sufficent conditions for concavity?, The World Wide Wade
• Computing pdf from cdf, Eli Luong
  • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, Robert Israel
    • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, david petry
  • Re: Computing pdf from cdf, danheyman@xxxxxxxxx
• Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, A
  • Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, Richard L. Hall
    • Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, A
    • Re: Modified Bessel Function Second Kind, Robert Israel
• Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Alternative to "inequality" for =< and >=, Chip Eastham
• Re: "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • Re: "Foundations of Analysis" by Landau - which version?, Eric J. Wingler
• Joint probability question, Eli Luong
• 7-th power, Deep
  • Re: 7-th power, Robert Israel
    • Re: 7-th power, Deep
      • Re: 7-th power, Robert Israel
• Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bill J.
  • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., William Elliot
  • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Robert Israel
  • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Jens Kruse Andersen
  • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bob
    • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., Bob
      • Re: Numbers that have the same digits as their factors., mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• point estimation of variance, Eli Luong
  • Re: point estimation of variance, Herman Rubin
• Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, Gerry Myerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, William Elliot
  • Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35
    • Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35
  • Re: How many way to make change for a quarter?, boanerges35
• Re: HIV antibody testing, Doug Goncz
• Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich
      • "dimensionality" v. "dimension" (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Lee Rudolph
      • Re: "dimensionality" v. "dimension" (was, Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?), Ken Pledger
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Robert Low
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Virgil
  • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Pinky
    • Re: Every Subspace of R^N has an Orthogonal Basis?, Hatto von Aquitanien
• Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, OwlHoot
  • Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Gene Ward Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Linking points on algebraic curves with class numbers, David Bernier
• The Math Tutor's Handbook, Janzia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Math Tutor's Handbook, Janzia
• Re: 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, matt271829-news
  • Re: 4 dimensional "cylinder" problem, Mateusz Berezecki
• Re: Reading Math Books, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Reading Math Books, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Reading Math Books, Robert Israel
• Re: Question about convention, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Question about convention, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Question about convention, Ken Pledger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about convention, William Elliot
• Re: Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, NotP
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Equivalent statements involving a commutative ring, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, NotP
  • Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike
    • Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, NotP
      • Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike
      • Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Urysohn's Lemma in Adult Rudin, Mike
• Model question, David Moran
• Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: What are all the (important) *-morphisms?, Arturo Magidin
• Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud
    • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Yecloud
      • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: help: proof of E(sup_n(Y_n)) < infinity, The World Wide Wade
• Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, David W . Cantrell
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Elliptic integral of the seconnd kind with complex amplitude, Badger
• Re: Hilbert 16th Problem, Ali Taghavi
• Upper bound for an interesting series? (application of 3^n - 2^s), Gottfried Helms
• a file of Fermat psp(5)s up to 10^12 or higher?, hanrahan398
• Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Ben Young
  • Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, martin cohen
    • Message not available
      • Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Rick Decker
  • Re: Claim of proof of Goldbach Conjecture and Twin Prime Conjecture, Ioannis
• Re: metric space, compactness, alex kim
  • Re: metric space, compactness, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: metric space, compactness, Robert Israel
• Another probability question, Zerex71
  • Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe
    • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
      • Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe
      • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
      • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
      • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
  • Re: Another probability question, Randy Poe
    • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
    • Re: Another probability question, Zerex71
• analysis!!, mina_world
  • Re: analysis!!, david petry
• Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Pious Audio
  • Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Pious Audio
  • Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), stush
  • Re: Simple Question, Don't Make Fun Please:), Virgil
• Convex functions properties, eugene
• Best formula, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Best formula, Virgil
    • Re: Best formula, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Best formula, Virgil
  • Re: Best formula, Ray Koopman
• Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Toni Lassila
  • Re: How to solve linear equation with linear constraints, Randy Poe
• Re: sin cos tan help, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: new question, Martin
• Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Iamaskingu
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, matt271829-news
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: What is next in the series? 2 more Q, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Are you intelligent or a dreaded fool?, Mr.Cools
  • Re: Are you intelligent or a dreaded fool?, Han de Bruijn
• Re: Equalizer in the category of rings, Jannick Asmus
• S_4 group, mina_world
  • Re: S_4 group, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: S_4 group, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: S_4 group, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: S_4 group, Chip Eastham
  • Re: S_4 group, Arturo Magidin
• Re: Differential form on Riemann Sphere, Timothy Murphy
• Re: Why you people are NOT pure, Faruq Qutaybah
• Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Low
  • Re: Knots in continuous curves, James Dolan
    • Re: Knots in continuous curves, Robert Israel
      • Re: Knots in continuous curves, Lee Rudolph
• That would be really cool, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: That would be really cool, Robert Low
    • Re: That would be really cool, Han de Bruijn
• Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, William Elliot
    • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, William Elliot
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, tamiry
    • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, The Qurqirish Dragon
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
    • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Robert Low
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, tamiry
  • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Justin
    • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Tom Smith
      • Re: Simple versus formal proof?, Mohab
• Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, William Elliot
  • Re: Sorry, rubbush ACII diagram, David
• Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Richard Tobin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Fractions for .999... (aka 1), Dave L. Renfro
• Re: JSH: Why you people are NOT pure, Tim Peters
• complex analysis 2 of 2, mina_world
  • Re: complex analysis 2 of 2, The World Wide Wade
• complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world
  • Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, mina_world
  • Re: complex analysis 1 of 2, The World Wide Wade
• Re: analysis !, mina_world
• " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Patrick Coilland
  • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", G. A. Edgar
    • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", Patrick Coilland
      • Re: " How to solve g(x, n+1) = Int { x0 to x g(x,n)dx } ", G. A. Edgar
• fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, eugene
  • Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, M.J.T. Guy
    • Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, eugene
      • Re: fractional part of the function at integer points+concave, The World Wide Wade
• Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Michael Jørgensen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Larry Lard
  • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, ss54
    • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Larry Lard
      • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Underground in New York and in London: where do you get lost more quickly??, Puppet_Sock
• probability estimates for a bird flu pandemic, guenter
• Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, gino
    • Re: Is bisection or golden ratio section search global optimal or local optimal?, martin cohen
• Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow
  • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, David R Tribble
    • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, David R Tribble
      • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Infinite Induction and the Limits of Curves, david petry
• Re: Is this a lattice?, Lee Rudolph
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Is this a lattice?, Marc Olschok
• diFFerential-equations with symmetry that gives two invariants!, NILS BÖRJESSON
• svd question, dps
• Geometry: easy?, Anolethron
• Help with Optimization, A
  • Re: Help with Optimization, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Help with Optimization, A
      • Re: Help with Optimization, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Help with Optimization, A
• Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, themadhatter012
  • Re: Nth Roots of Unity And Groups, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• A trigonometric equation, Deep
• Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., googleposter226
  • Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., Spice Malenge
  • Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Parity of Sum of Binomial Coefficients., Tim Peters
• Re: (RSPoliticsW) I'm Calling It: What Bu$hCo Will Say When N.Korea Blows Up California?, Jim E
• distributive property proof, Luke Wu
  • Re: distributive property proof, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: distributive property proof, supermoron
    • Re: distributive property proof, Aloha Kakuikanu
      • Re: distributive property proof, Luke Wu
    • Re: distributive property proof, Luke Wu
  • Re: distributive property proof, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: distributive property proof, Ken Pledger
• Even more tensor trouble, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Even more tensor trouble, Ryan Reich
  • Re: Even more tensor trouble, David Park
• f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene
  • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, abose
  • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Aage Andersen
    • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, N/A
    • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene
    • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, Robert Israel
  • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: f(f(x)) = x + a , f - derivable, eugene
• Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve
  • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David Grieve
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Shannon's "well known" result, David C . Ullrich
• irreducible polynomial, mina_world
  • Re: irreducible polynomial, mina_world
    • Re: irreducible polynomial, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: irreducible polynomial, Arturo Magidin
• Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, nt109nsf
  • Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, Robert Low
  • Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Zermelo-Fraenkel axioms, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• trigonometric identity, Bart
  • Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low
    • Re: trigonometric identity, Bart
      • Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low
      • Re: trigonometric identity, Bart
      • Re: trigonometric identity, Robert Low
• decomposition of a logarithm of 1/R in the series, eugene
• Linear Regression with occasional out-of-range data, Jack
• Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters
  • Message not available
    • Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: JSH: SF: Simpler factoring idea, but does it work?, MTD
• subseries, MR
  • Re: subseries, Mike
    • Re: subseries, Ken Pledger
  • Re: subseries, correction to previous, Mike
    • Re: subseries, correction to previous, MR
  • Re: subseries, Ryan Reich
    • Re: subseries, Dave L. Renfro
• Is this integral well known?, Nacho
  • Re: Is this integral well known?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Is this integral well known?, Nacho
      • Re: Is this integral well known?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Is this integral well known?, Robert Low
    • Re: Is this integral well known?, G. A. Edgar
• One is a Unit?, dtfoster
  • Re: One is a Unit?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: One is a Unit?, James Dolan
    • Re: One is a Unit?, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: One is a Unit?, Dave Seaman
    • Re: One is a Unit?, dtfoster
      • Re: One is a Unit?, Robert Israel
• Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, jaapsch
    • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Snis Pilbor
      • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Russell
      • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, John H Palmieri
      • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Russell
  • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Is there an easy way to show a transposition & n-cycle generate S_n?, Ryan Reich
• derivatives of power of a function, luisa
  • Re: derivatives of power of a function, Gene Ward Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: derivatives of power of a function, luisa
• Frustrating group actions question, stonemcstone
  • Re: Frustrating group actions question, mskirvin
• Functional calculus question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Functional calculus question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Functional calculus question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
      • Re: Functional calculus question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Functional calculus question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Functional calculus question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
• Four Color Theorem, bill
  • Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes
    • Re: Four Color Theorem, bill
      • Re: Four Color Theorem, bill
      • Re: Four Color Theorem, bill
      • Re: Four Color Theorem, Proginoskes
• pde, prakash
• Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Versions and indistinguishability, Dave L. Renfro
• Even Perfect numbers and the Colatz 3x+1 problem, Dan
• Find all solutions, hayk
  • Re: Find all solutions, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Find all solutions, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Find all solutions, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Find all solutions, Patrick Coilland
• square root confusion, Tom
  • Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: square root confusion, Tom
      • Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: square root confusion, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: square root confusion, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: square root confusion, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: square root confusion, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: square root confusion, Tom
    • Re: square root confusion, matt271829-news
    • Re: square root confusion, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: square root confusion, Tom
• An minimization problem regarding the inverse of a Gram matrix, su_jionglong@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: Simple proofs with a "lateral thinking step", James Waldby
• Failure?, sensible
• Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Jman
    • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Jman
    • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien
    • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, skuesey
      • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Duncan Smith
      • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Ken Pledger
      • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gib Bogle
  • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Sensei
  • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Dann Corbit
    • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Curious: Why is slope called "m"?, Dann Corbit
• paths and walks, eric
• Întegral of the bernoulli-functions, Gottfried Helms
• Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Jake Mulch
  • Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, David Bernier
    • Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Number of Monte-Carlo evaluations, Herman Rubin
• (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, mina_world
  • Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, mina_world
      • Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: (x+y)^n = x^n+y^n, Proginoskes
• union convex set is not convex, Ismail
  • Re: union convex set is not convex, William Elliot
    • Re: union convex set is not convex, Ismail
      • Re: union convex set is not convex, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: union convex set is not convex, Ismail
      • Re: union convex set is not convex, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: union convex set is not convex, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: union convex set is not convex, Virgil
• Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Ryan Reich
      • Re: Is Analytic Geometry really Geometry?, Lee Rudolph
• Newton-Kantorovich theorem demonstration, lucas
• differential geometry..., Anolethron
  • Re: differential geometry..., Lee Rudolph
    • Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron
      • Re: differential geometry..., Robert Low
      • Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron
      • Re: differential geometry..., bobovski
      • Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron
  • Re: differential geometry..., Anolethron
• endomorphim ring of a simple module, Arman
  • Re: endomorphim ring of a simple module, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: endomorphim ring of a simple module, Derek Holt
• How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, dtmackenzie
  • Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least a non-trivial upper bound for this?, dtmackenzie
  • Re: How many finite geometries are there on n points? Or is there at least, T.H. Ray
• convex function., mina_world
  • Re: convex function., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: convex function., mina_world
• Difference Please, dtfoster
  • Re: Difference Please, Robert Israel
• analysis...., mina_world
  • Re: analysis...., NotP
  • Re: analysis...., Robert Israel
  • Re: analysis...., Bill Dubuque
• JSH: Like baseball, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: JSH: Like baseball, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: JSH: Like baseball, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: JSH: Like baseball, John Meglier
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, MTD
    • Re: JSH: Like baseball, gjedwards
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, Justin
  • Re: Like baseball, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, willo_thewisp
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, Randy Poe
    • Re: JSH: Like baseball, Randy Poe
  • Re: Like baseball, John Meglier
  • Re: Like baseball, Spice Malenge
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, martin cohen
    • Re: JSH: Like baseball, Spice Malenge
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, litsohate
  • Re: JSH: Like baseball, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Continuous Gradient?, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Continuous Gradient?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Continuous Gradient?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• Silly Proof, E
  • Re: Silly Proof, John Meglier
    • Re: Silly Proof, E
  • Re: Silly Proof, Lord Protector
    • Re: Silly Proof, E
      • Re: Silly Proof, Proginoskes
  • Re: Silly Proof, paya
    • Re: Silly Proof, wkaras
• sobolev embedding ?, Fedor
  • Re: sobolev embedding ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: sobolev embedding ?, Fedor
• Question with inforation theory, yezi
• solving an unusual trig equation, Joshua C Sasmor
  • Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Virgil
    • Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Robert Israel
      • Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Joshua C Sasmor
      • Re: solving an unusual trig equation, Robert Israel
      • Re: solving an unusual trig equation, David W . Cantrell
• q:partial derivitive for image comparison, laniik
  • Re: q:partial derivitive for image comparison, laniik
• Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dann Corbit
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Russell
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Rupert
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, imaginatorium
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Daryl McCullough
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
    • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
      • Re: An uncountable countable set, Virgil
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, mueckenh
  • Re: An uncountable countable set, Dik T. Winter
• Dirichlet problem / direct sum, don
  • Re: Dirichlet problem / direct sum, Rick Decker
• Voronoi Diagram, prakash
  • Re: Voronoi Diagram, Robert Low
    • Re: Voronoi Diagram, Lot-o-fun
• please explain the solution., jaya
  • Re: please explain the solution., Randy Poe
  • Re: please explain the solution-, JEMebius
• Some (slightly used) math books for sale, dgiaimo
  • Re: Some (slightly used) math books for sale, dgiaimo
• Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Larry Hammick
  • Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Larry Lard
    • Re: Hammick's Law of Thread Decay, Toni Lassila
• Computing a series, csimon
  • Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel
  • Re: Computing a series, A N Niel
    • Re: Computing a series, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Computing a series, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Computing a series, csimon
    • Re: Computing a series, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Computing a series, matt271829-news
      • Re: Computing a series, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Computing a series, matt271829-news
    • Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel
      • Re: Computing a series, Robert Israel
      • Re: Computing a series, csimon
• distribution ?, Fedor
  • Re: distribution ?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: distribution ?, Fedor
      • Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: distribution ?, Fedor
      • Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: distribution ?, David C . Ullrich
• Measurability question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Measurability question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Measurability question, Robert Israel
    • Re: Measurability question, Gonçalo Rodrigues
      • Re: Measurability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Measurability question, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Measurability question, G. A. Edgar
• The sequence from HELL., ram . rachum
  • Re: The sequence from HELL., José Carlos Santos
  • Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel
    • Re: The sequence from HELL., martin cohen
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., matt271829-news
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., Robert Israel
      • Re: The sequence from HELL., Herman Rubin
• [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD
  • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Gerard Schildberger
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Virgil
  • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, cody . roux
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD
      • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, Tim Peters
    • Re: [Factorization] Is SQUFOF efficient?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD
  • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, MTD
    • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, D. J. Bernstein
      • Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?, Pubkeybreaker
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 19, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Re: binary relations, Virgil
  • Re: binary relations, Arturo Magidin
    • Message not available
      • Re: binary relations, Arturo Magidin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: binary relations, cody . roux
• linear?, G Patel
  • Re: linear?, Mike
    • Re: linear?, G Patel
    • Re: linear?, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: linear?, Reef Fish
  • Re: linear?, Toni Lassila
• Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, wojciech
  • Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, caulagi
  • Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, James Dolan
    • Re: Graph Theory - Vertex Colouring, mikemaskery
• Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY
  • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose
    • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
  • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
    • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY
    • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, Peter Webb
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, abose
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
      • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, matt271829-news
  • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, gwh
    • Re: Observed elevation of a mountain peak, GARY
• So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Hatto von Aquitanien
    • Message not available
      • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Thomas Mautsch
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Michael Siemon
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Exterior algebra was Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666
    • Message not available
      • Re: So What's a Determinant?, victor_meldrew_666
  • redlady115@hotmail.com, angel
  • redlady115@hotmail.com, angel
  • redlady115@hotmail.com, angel
• Math Graduate program in DC, alex_G
  • Re: Math Graduate program in DC, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Math Graduate program in DC, Gene Ward Smith
• Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio
  • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Ryan Reich
      • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio
    • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Q: Riemann hypothesis (RH) and prime between consecutive squares, Tapio
• Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Doug B
  • Re: Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: Rings of order p^2 with unit -- why are they commutative?, Cameron
• heine cantor teorem, Catarina Dias
  • Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich
    • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, N. Silver
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Ryan Reich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: heine cantor teorem, Paulo Matos
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Paulo Matos
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: heine cantor teorem, David C . Ullrich
• a question about Lebesgue integral, eugene
  • Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, Ryan Reich
    • Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, eugene
      • Re: a question about Lebesgue integral, cody . roux
• Need help with the final laps of this long ring theory problem, Doug B
  • Re: Need help with the final laps of this long ring theory problem, Ryan Reich
• Watch Adult TV, Sports, Worldcup, sales
• Tensor Trouble, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Tensor Trouble, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Tensor Trouble, Robert Low
• Re: Torkel Franzén is dead, Reef Fish
• My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas
  • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Richard Henry
  • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, matt271829-news
    • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Mike Kent
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Savihammas
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Ryan Reich
      • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, Ryan Reich
  • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
    • Re: My own Monty Hall explanation, matt271829-news
• Re: JSH: SF: Sad part, my discoveries against politics, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SF: Sad part, my discoveries against politics, Dik T. Winter
• Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, uberclay
  • Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, Virgil
    • Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, uberclay
    • Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, matt271829-news
      • Re: Understanding the general from of a conic as it relates to standard form equations - Grade 11, Virgil
• analysis.., mina_world
  • Re: analysis.., Patrick Coilland
    • Re: analysis.., mina_world
• Simple proof of FLT ?, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Simple proof of FLT ?, Wim Benthem
    • Re: Simple proof of FLT ?, Roman B. Binder
• Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, matt . heise
    • Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, John Meglier
      • Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, almo
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: This should be an easy question for you guys - triangulation?, Dave L. Renfro
• How to find certain integer triples?, rich burge
  • Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Sandi . Eastham
  • Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Chip Eastham
    • Re: How to find certain integer triples?, rich burge
      • Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Chip Eastham
  • Re: How to find certain integer triples?, Proginoskes
• looking at mean, mode, and median, SportsNut
  • Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Proginoskes
    • Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Proginoskes
  • Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Virgil
  • Re: looking at mean, mode, and median, Lot-o-fun
• uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, CAFxX
  • Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, Dave Seaman
    • Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, CAFxX
      • Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, Stan Liou
      • Re: uniform distribution of P points on a (D) dimensions sphere, kunzmilan
• Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, canadan
  • Re: Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, Ryan Reich
    • Re: Are all subsets of affine space quasi-compact (in the Zariski topology) ?, canadan
• Factorial Question, Jonas
  • Re: Factorial Question, matt271829-news
    • Re: Factorial Question, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Factorial Question, The World Wide Wade
• JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, SkyHc
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, willo_thewisp
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, willo_thewisp
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, ungernerik
  • Re: Those damn fools, math is before us, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, Lord Protector
  • Re: Those damn fools, math is before us, John Meglier
  • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Those damn fools, math is before us, T.H. Ray
• particular solution of the differential equation, eugene
  • Re: particular solution of the differential equation, John Meglier
  • Re: particular solution of the differential equation, G.E. Ivey
• Solving Maxwell's equations with Matlab, Tom mmm
• Re: IHES centenary of A.Weil, Allan Adler
• Constructions of Real Numbers, admax
  • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
  • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
    • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, A N Niel
    • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Ryan Reich
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Ryan Reich
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, ADmax
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Robert Israel
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, William Elliot
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Constructions of Real Numbers, Virgil
• is Poisson process also Markov process ?, vertigo
  • Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Mike Kelly
  • Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, James Dolan
      • Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: is Poisson process also Markov process ?, James Dolan
• ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, victor_meldrew_666
    • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
      • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, victor_meldrew_666
      • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
  • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: ((p-3)/2)! mod p, Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
• DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Dave
  • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Virgil
  • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, John Meglier
  • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Dave
    • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, John Meglier
    • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, mike4ty4
      • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, guenther vonKnakspot
  • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, mike4ty4
    • Re: DOES MATHS HAVE ALL ANSWERS?, Abstract Dissonance
• Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith
  • Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith
    • Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, smn
      • Re: Straightforward (?) nets question, Tom Smith
• weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Fedor
  • Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Fedor
      • Re: weak convergence and moment of measure ?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• problem - help me please, adam
  • Re: problem - help me please, Falagar
    • Re: problem - help me please, adam
      • Re: problem - help me please, eugene
  • Re: problem - help me please, William Elliot
• computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
  • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), James Dolan
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Randy Yates
      • Re: computing rational values of cos(x), Robert Israel
• Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler
  • Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler
  • Re: Anybody got an IQ over 20 here?, Euler
• A little programming help..., Euler
  • Re: A little programming help..., abose
• SoA Press Release "Young Mother and Child Longevity", Actuary
• Prove this, zxcv
  • Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Prove this, Euler
      • Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Prove this, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Prove this, Euler
  • Re: Prove this, Dale Shoults
  • Re: Prove this, stush
• Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, mskirvin
    • Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, Falagar
      • Re: Looking for feedback for a True/False question from a practice qual, mskirvin
• The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony
  • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony
      • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, symphony
      • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Proginoskes
    • Re: The Ring Of Complex Numbers Has Been Generalized, Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Can you do it?, Eric B
  • Re: Can you do it?, mike4ty4
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Can you do it?, Dave Rusin
• Re: Simple proof of FLT: Why is it impossible?, Roman B. Binder
  • Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
    • Re: Fermat's Last Theorem and infinite descent, Roman B. Binder
• Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
    • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, matt271829-news
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, tbonepower07
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
      • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Denis Feldmann
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Dale Shoults
    • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
  • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Dale Shoults
    • Re: Unexpected shot for FLT !, Roman B. Binder
• L^p duality, don
  • Re: L^p duality, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: L^p duality, don
• Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Richard Hayden
  • Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Christopher J. Henrich
    • Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Larry Deack
      • Re: Truncated icosahedron and dodecahedron, Christopher J. Henrich
• updating sums, Bart
  • Re: updating sums, Proginoskes
• FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, dave
  • Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, Jman
  • Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, abose
    • Re: FACTORIALS BY Algorithm -please comment, Gerry Myerson
• Another doubt about Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo
  • Re: Another doubt about Laplace transform, astanoff
    • Re: Another doubt about Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo
• Laplace transform, Sandra Bomtempo
  • Re: Laplace transform, Badger
  • Re: Laplace transform, Jman
• Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, A N Niel
    • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, A N Niel
      • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Is 1/(x-a)^2 locally Lipschitz continuous?, The World Wide Wade
• Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, jcsantos
    • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
    • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Peter Webb
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, ArtflDodgr
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dik T. Winter
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Message not available
      • Re: Does such strange function exist (nondiff yet cont)?, David C . Ullrich
• arithmétique, denis.pepin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: arithmétique, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: arithmétique, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: arithmétique, Philippe 92
• Pls. help to count probabilities, valery
  • Re: Pls. help to count probabilities, bert
    • Re: Pls. help to count probabilities, valery
• Re: Maple experts, who are they?, Saifd Nasheem
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Maple experts, who are they?, Dement
• Calculus Homework Help, dmmcmah@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Euler
    • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Euler
  • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SF: Using square root ambiguity to factor, Tim Peters
• Re: balls and metric, Ronald Bruck
• JSH: To Decker and Peters, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Justin
  • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, jshsucks
  • Re: To Decker and Peters, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Gib Bogle
  • Re: To Decker and Peters, Spice Melange
  • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: To Decker and Peters, MTD
• Transit ridership to demographics, kbrotcke
• stochastic question from cryptography, Jochen Stand
• Re: JSH: So they lied, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: JSH: So they lied, Finder
    • Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: JSH: So they lied, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: JSH: So they lied, The Last Danish Pastry
• Homeomorphism, Andrew
  • Re: Homeomorphism, Andrew
  • Re: Homeomorphism, Robert Israel
  • Re: Homeomorphism, The World Wide Wade
• Re: Probability Question, Keith A. Lewis
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Probability Question, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Probability Question, Robert Israel
    • Re: Probability Question, Herman Rubin
• Residue Number System Arithmetic, Jules César
  • Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Christian Siebert
    • Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Jules César
      • Re: Residue Number System Arithmetic, Christian Siebert
• <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe
  • Re: <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe
  • <a href="http://your-metronidazole.0catch.com">metronidazole</a>, qweqwe
• What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich
    • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, James Dolan
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Dave Rusin
      • Re: What to call the component structure of a tensor?, Ryan Reich
• What is compact set?, Linda
  • Re: What is compact set?, Robert Low
  • Re: What is compact set?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: What is compact set?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: What is compact set?, Paul
    • Re: What is compact set?, William Elliot
      • Re: What is compact set?, Ulysse from CH
  • Re: What is compact set?-, JEMebius
  • Re: What is compact set?, James Dolan
  • Re: What is compact set?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
    • Re: What is compact set?, Mike Kent
  • Re: What is compact set?, jsher
  • Re: What is compact set?, martin dowd
• Re: So they lied, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: So they lied, guenther vonKnakspot
• How 3=2, anuragsaxenajpr
  • Re: How 3=2, Jussi Piitulainen
  • Re: How 3=2, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: How 3=2, Larry Lard
  • Re: How 3=2, Robert Low
  • Re: How 3=2, Paul
  • Re: How 3=2, Virgil
  • Re: How 3=2, Hanford Carr
• Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke
  • Re: Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke
    • Re: Connecting semi-circles, matt271829-news
      • Re: Connecting semi-circles, b . fokke
      • Re: Connecting semi-circles, Robert Israel
  • Re: Connecting semi-circles, BuddhaThu
• sum of cosines, Bart
  • Re: sum of cosines, William Elliot
  • Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: sum of cosines, Bart Vandewoestyne
      • Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: sum of cosines, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: sum of cosines, Bart
  • Re: sum of cosines-, JEMebius
• Curious properties of j-function formulas, titus_piezas
• Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Lot-o-fun
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, hale
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Virgil
  • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Patrick
    • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Axioms or 'Taxioms'?, Michael Stemper
• point yes/no within a specific area, martijn
  • Re: point yes/no within a specific area, martijn
    • Re: point yes/no within a specific area, William Elliot
  • Re: point yes/no within a specific area, Randy Poe
  • Re: point yes/no within a specific area, Han de Bruijn
• Defining a cumulative distribution function, Eli Luong
  • Re: Defining a cumulative distribution function, Stan Liou
  • Message not available
    • Re: Defining a cumulative distribution function, Eli Luong
• uniformly equicontinuous, NotP
  • Re: uniformly equicontinuous, NotP
    • Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Robert Israel
    • Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Stan Liou
      • Re: uniformly equicontinuous, Stan Liou
  • Re: uniformly equicontinuous, The World Wide Wade
• Re: SATANIC JEWISH NEW WORLD ORDER: SATAN COMES HOME TO ROOST!!, Mordechai Housman
• ? solving outgoing Helmholtz eqn using fft, Cheng Cosine
• Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, Eli Luong
  • Message not available
    • Re: Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, Eli Luong
      • Re: Binomial and hypergeometric distributions, kunzmilan
• generalized standard form for a conjecture, tommy1729
• Holder / L^p regularity, don
• Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel
  • Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel
      • Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Affine and projective manifolds, Die Herren Rubens und Michel
• Basic Complex Analysis Question, James
  • Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, Robert Israel
  • Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Basic Complex Analysis Question, José Carlos Santos
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Basic complex analysis question, James
    • Re: Basic complex analysis question, James
      • Re: Basic complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Basic complex analysis question, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Basic complex analysis question, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: Basic complex analysis question, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Basic complex analysis question, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Basic complex analysis question, The World Wide Wade
• simple homeomorphism, Litania
  • Re: simple homeomorphism, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: simple homeomorphism, David C . Ullrich
• Is this space a Hausdorff space?, pkg
  • Re: Is this space a Hausdorff space?, Herman Rubin
• Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), xan2
  • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), xan2
      • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Demostration about f^{-1}(\emptyset)=A - Dom(f), Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• ball surface integral, tamiry
  • Re: ball surface integral, David Hartley
    • Re: ball surface integral, David Hartley
• Addition of complex roots, manucito
  • Re: Addition of complex roots, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: Addition of complex roots, MTD
  • Re: Addition of complex roots, Robert Israel
    • Re: Addition of complex roots, manucito
  • Re: Addition of complex roots, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Addition of complex roots, David C . Ullrich
• asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham
  • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham
  • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham
    • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham
  • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: asymptotic evaluation of an integral, John Billingham
• Single player game theory?, makc . the . great
  • Re: Single player game theory?, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Single player game theory?, Nathan
      • Re: Single player game theory?, makc . the . great
  • Re: Single player game theory?, John Bailey
    • Re: Single player game theory?, makc . the . great
      • Re: Single player game theory?, John Bailey
• Re: elementary set theory, G.E. Ivey
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: elementary set theory, William Elliot
    • Re: elementary set theory, Sere
  • Re: elementary set theory, Igor Khavkine
• Continuous maps and open/closed sets, newsgroups.reader@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Robert Low
  • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot
    • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot
  • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, David C . Ullrich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, Robert Low
    • Message not available
      • Re: Continuous maps and open/closed sets, William Elliot
• when can I replace this inf by min?, diegotorquemada
  • Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: when can I replace this inf by min?, Dave Seaman
• very nice math video, 1gentle . giant
  • Re: very nice math video, Michael Jørgensen
• Minimum set of constraints in linear optimisation problem, Alec . Edgington
• Distance between segments, zaknospam@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Distance between segments, matt271829-news
    • Re: Distance between segments, matt271829-news
  • Re: Distance between segments, M.J.T. Guy
• Weirdest graph?, mike4ty4
  • Re: Weirdest graph?, gjedwards
  • Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Weirdest graph?, William Elliot
      • Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Weirdest graph?, M.J.T. Guy
      • Re: Weirdest graph?, Dave L. Renfro
• Extensions of modules, Michael Knudsen
  • Re: Extensions of modules, Derek Holt
    • Re: Extensions of modules, Michael Knudsen
      • Re: Extensions of modules, Derek Holt
• independence of multiple events, Eli Luong
  • Re: independence of multiple events, William Elliot
    • Re: independence of multiple events, Eli Luong
      • Re: independence of multiple events, William Elliot
• Can you crack the Code?, thewwwcode
• Re: JSH: So quiet, new factoring method or not?, tommy1729
• Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, xyz91234
  • Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Virgil
  • Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: Generalize Scalar Functions on Matrices, Robert Israel
• l i t tle - he l p, Ludovico
  • Re: l i t tle - he l p, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: l i t tle - he l p, Ludovico
    • Re: l i t tle - he l p, Virgil
• probability venn diagram question, Eli Luong
  • Re: probability venn diagram question, mathman
    • Re: probability venn diagram question, Eli Luong
• conjecture: p-adics analysis = Real Analysis + variance Re: where biology becomes mathematics, a_plutonium
• how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo
  • Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo
      • Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: how to calculate/list all fit values, john_woo
• Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Correction:Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil
  • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil
    • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, Virgil
      • Re: Multiplication and addition differ by zero, David C . Ullrich
• function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, eugene
  • Re: function with compact support and its Fourier transform, victor_meldrew_666
  • Re: function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: function with compact support and it's Fourier transform, David C . Ullrich
• Complex numbers inequality, mirthis
  • Re: Complex numbers inequality, Falagar
    • Re: Complex numbers inequality, mirthis
  • Re: Complex numbers inequality, The World Wide Wade
• Re: Pet Ownership - Killing Through Kindness, Mike Schilling
• Is this a proof?, Dan
  • Re: Is this a proof?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Is this a proof?, Dan
• Re: JSH: Listening to investors, José Carlos Santos
• Infinity, Matlock
  • Re: Infinity, MTD
  • Re: Infinity, Michael
  • Re: Infinity, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: Infinity, Igor
• IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, robert
  • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
    • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, tamiry
      • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, MTD
      • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, tamiry
    • Re: IT IS A MATHIMATICAL PHENOM, $5000 IN 7 DAYS RUN THESE FIGURES, MTD
• Calculating a mean angle, Scott
  • Re: Calculating a mean angle, Stan Liou
    • Re: Calculating a mean angle, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: Calculating a mean angle, Stan Liou
    • Re: Calculating a mean angle, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Calculating a mean angle, Duncan Muirhead
• Lipschitz continuity, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Lipschitz continuity, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Lipschitz continuity, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Lipschitz continuity, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Lipschitz continuity, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Lipschitz continuity, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Lipschitz continuity, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
• JSH: But what is truth?, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Bob Terwilliger
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, MTD
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, david petry
      • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, amzoti
  • Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: But what is truth?, Mary K
      • Re: But what is truth?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: But what is truth?, Richard Tobin
      • Re: But what is truth?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann
    • Re: But what is truth?, Virgil
    • Re: But what is truth?, Tim Peters
      • Re: But what is truth?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: But what is truth?, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: But what is truth?, Larry Lard
      • Re: But what is truth?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: But what is truth?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: But what is truth?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: But what is truth?, MTD
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, T.H. Ray
  • Re: JSH: But what is truth?, Proginoskes
• sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, glenbarnett
  • Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, Robert Israel
      • Re: sqrt(exp(x^2)-1) - a very positive function?, glenbarnett
• Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Leroy Quet
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, matt271829-news
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Dann Corbit
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Amiey
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Virgil
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mathedman
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Leroy Quet
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Is Infinity A Divisor Of n?, Ross A. Finlayson
• Vertex/Intersection Polygon Game, Leroy Quet
  • Re: Vertex/Intersection Polygon Game, Leroy Quet
• cross/dot product question, tamiry
  • Re: cross/dot product question, Paul Sperry
  • Re: cross/dot product question, ADM
  • Re: cross/dot product question, martin dowd
• Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, vernonner3voltazim
  • Re: Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, Charlie
  • Re: Goedel's Proof and Transfinity, Arturo Magidin
• Force/Torque required to coil spring around mandrel., lmcgill2
• Re: Matrix form for polysign product, tommy1729
  • Re: Matrix form for polysign product, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, tamiry
  • Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, tamiry
      • Re: diagonal & side-bisectors in parallelogram, Count Dracula
• CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Chip Eastham
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, jhnrmsdn
    • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
    • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, tommy1729
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Spoonfed
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Tom
    • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Tom
      • Re: CRITICAL TORUS !!!, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• Re: OT: Soduko takes the country by storm!, israel
• OMEGA of the thermal field, T=2.7 K is 2/3, NILS BÖRJESSON
• Realization of homomorphisms of measure algebras, Gonçalo Rodrigues
• Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David Moran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, eugene
  • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David C . Ullrich
    • Message not available
      • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, Lee Rudolph
    • Message not available
      • Re: Derivatives of Bessel functions?, David C . Ullrich
• Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults
  • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Virgil
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Falagar
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dave Rusin
    • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: Find all solutions of a^4 - 4 a^2 b^2 + b^4 = square, Dale Shoults
• Another question for you - sample spaces, Zerex71
  • Re: Another question for you - sample spaces, Virgil
  • Re: Another question for you - sample spaces, Robert Israel
• Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71
  • Re: Questions about probability functions, Robert Israel
    • Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71
      • Re: Questions about probability functions, Robert Israel
      • Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71
      • Message not available
      • Re: Questions about probability functions, Zerex71
• Prime number distribution, jt64
  • Re: Prime number distribution, bert
  • Re: Prime number distribution, Chip Eastham
• Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, JH
  • Re: Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, Stephan W Mueller
    • Re: Cauchy method of residues for double integrals ?, JH
• differential equation+even, eugene
  • Re: differential equation+even, Igor
    • Re: differential equation+even, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: differential equation+even, eugene
  • Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel
    • Re: differential equation+even, eugene
      • Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel
      • Re: differential equation+even, Robert Israel
• A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Chip Eastham
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Virgil
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Norm Dresner
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Volker Boie
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Robert Low
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Virgil
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Robert Low
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Chip Eastham
  • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: A basic question on real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: A basic question on real numbers, Herman Jurjus
• Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore
  • Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Robert Israel
  • Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore
    • Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Superposition of solutions in PDF, Lenore
• Murder in the name of the rose, jt64
  • Re: Murder in the name of the rose, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Murder in the name of the rose, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Murder in the name of the rose, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Murder in the name of the rose, jt64
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 12, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Ulam's Rose, jt64
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Ulam's Rose, jt64
    • Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64
      • Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64
      • Re: Ulam's Rose, bert
      • Re: Ulam's Rose, jt64
      • Re: Ulam's Rose, bert
      • Re: Ulam's Rose, Denis Feldmann
• Matrix, Matlock
  • Re: Matrix, kunzmilan
  • Re: Matrix, Linda
  • Re: Matrix, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Matrix, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Matrix, ADM
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Matrix, Matlock
  • Matrix, Matlock
    • Re: Matrix-, JEMebius
• Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Difficult limit question from an analysis qual, M.J.T. Guy
• general proof question, vsgdp
  • Re: general proof question, Stan Liou
• Why is this true, xyzer
  • Re: Why is this true, Stan Liou
  • Re: Why is this true, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Why is this true, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Why is this true, A N Niel
  • Re: Why is this true, Richard Henry
  • Re: Why is this true, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Why is this true, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Why is this true, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Why is this true, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Why is this true, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• minimal anisomorphism, SysTom
• Arranging m objects into n piles, Sam
  • Re: Arranging m objects into n piles, Stan Liou
  • Re: Arranging m objects into n piles, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Integer solutions, Deep
  • Re: Integer solutions, William Elliot
• Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, jstevh
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Randy Poe
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Finally useful theory?, Gottfried Helms
• Need an an example of a function, NotP
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Rupert
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Rupert
    • Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP
      • Re: Need an an example of a function, Virgil
      • Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP
      • Re: Need an an example of a function, Amiey
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Need an an example of a function, NotP
      • Re: Need an an example of a function, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Need an an example of a function, Robert Israel
      • Re: Need an an example of a function, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Need an an example of a function, Herman Rubin
• Japanese Temple Geometry, gmarkowsky
  • Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, martijn
    • Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, gmarkowsky
      • Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, Hero
  • Re: Japanese Temple Geometry, Stan Rabinowitz
• uniform convergence, robert
  • Re: uniform convergence, A N Niel
• probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, shadovv
  • Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, N. Silver
    • Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, shadovv
      • Re: probability: inseparable events, multiple trials, AllenTechServices
• S^n x |R parallelizable, konstantin . schaedler
  • Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, konstantin . schaedler
      • Re: S^n x |R parallelizable, Lee Rudolph
• JSH: So I lose, jstevh
  • Re: So I lose, N. Silver
  • Re: So I lose, John
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, Matthijs Hebly
  • Re: So I lose, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: So I lose, N. Silver
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, Tim Peters
  • Re: So I lose, Richard Henry
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, Bertie Reed
    • Re: JSH: So I lose, gjedwards
  • Re: So I lose, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, Wayne Brown
  • Re: JSH: So I lose, litsohate
    • Re: JSH: So I lose, Gib Bogle
• Singular Value Decomposition, Sensei
  • Re: Singular Value Decomposition, Garrett Baird
    • Re: Singular Value Decomposition, Robert Israel
• THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, switzerland qunatium computer
  • Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, John
  • Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, ytyourclothes
    • Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, Amiey
  • Re: THE MATRIX IS PERFECT MORE COMPLEX THEN THE UNIVERSE and if you took a, gwh
• Cookbook for Ito calculus, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Cookbook for Ito calculus, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
• Re: L^2 with a complex measure, A N Niel
• question about quaternions, eugene
  • Re: question about quaternions, Falagar
  • Re: question about quaternions, Igor
  • Re: question about quaternions-, JEMebius
• are operators on complete distributive lattices continuous?, Tobias Matzner
• Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
  • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
    • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Kira Yamato
      • Re: Membership in a polynomial ring, Falagar
• Homomorphism, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Homomorphism, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Homomorphism, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: Homomorphism, Bill Dubuque
  • Re: Homomorphism, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Homomorphism, Lot-o-fun
• Example+Fourier transform, eugene
  • Re: Example+Fourier transform, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Example+Fourier transform, Herman Rubin
• Some examples in elementary ergodic theory., philippe
• a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), eugene
  • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), phbouafia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Fedor
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Fedor
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Timothy Murphy
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), Lee Rudolph
      • Re: a finite group and embedding in GL_n(Z), David Bernier
• Topological Groups, William Elliot
• Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Provinf bounded variation, A N Niel
    • Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Provinf bounded variation, A N Niel
      • Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten
  • Re: Provinf bounded variation, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Provinf bounded variation, Konrad Viltersten
      • Re: Provinf bounded variation, The World Wide Wade
• Simpson Integration - a specific problem, MET
  • Re: Simpson Integration - a specific problem, Robert Israel
• Over $250 Free Poker, Casino Money - No deposits required, Jim
  • Re: Over $250 Free Poker, Casino Money - No deposits required, donstockbauer
• functional equation+derivable, eugene
  • Re: functional equation+derivable, William Elliot
    • Re: functional equation+derivable, eugene
      • Re: functional equation+derivable, William Elliot
      • Re: functional equation+derivable, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: functional equation+derivable, Robert Sheskey
• Re: SF: More equations to check, no claims, José Carlos Santos
• Re: Surrogate factoring, dead idea, Jesse F. Hughes
• Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes
  • Re: Need some help with digits..., Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Need some help with digits..., Virgil
    • Re: Need some help with digits..., ytyourclothes
      • Re: Need some help with digits..., Virgil
  • Re: Need some help with digits..., Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Re: JSH: Surrogate factoring, dead idea, Tim Peters
• basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan
  • Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa
    • Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan
      • Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa
      • Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, canadan
      • Re: basic question on affine algebraic varieties, Ted Hwa
• Something a little more lighthearted!, lynX
  • Re: Something a little more lighthearted!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Something a little more lighthearted!, lynX
• JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, John
      • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, marcus_b
    • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Larry Hammick
  • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, Justin
  • Re: JSH: Hyperbolas, parabolas, litsohate
• It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey
  • Re: It looks simple but.., rip pelletier
  • Re: It looks simple but.., Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey
      • Message not available
      • Re: It looks simple but.., Proginoskes
      • Message not available
      • Re: It looks simple but.., Peter Nachtwey
      • Re: It looks simple but.., Dirk Van de moortel
• A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil
    • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, xyzer
    • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, rtonyreeder
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, rtonyreeder
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mathman
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dave Seaman
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, mathman
    • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Proginoskes
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Virgil
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, N. Silver
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Proginoskes
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Phil Carmody
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, bill
  • Message not available
    • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Message not available
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Mike Kelly
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, donstockbauer
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Ben Rudiak-Gould
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, N. Silver
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: A more intuitive and simple way of thinking about the Monty Hall problem, Ben Rudiak-Gould
• Complex exponential function?, nimcha
  • Re: Complex exponential function?, Chip Eastham
• Reed Solomon encoding, sugolini
  • Re: Reed Solomon encoding, Jyrki Lahtonen
• Correlation Median and Mean value?, Pierre Bast
  • Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, malcolm-fowler
    • Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, matt271829-news
      • Re: Correlation Median and Mean value?, Virgil
• Random Variable??, group . fbi
  • Re: Random Variable??, A N Niel
    • Re: Random Variable??, Abstract Dissonance
• " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland
    • Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland
      • Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", Patrick Coilland
      • Re: " Solving 1 + p(1- p(x)) = g^[2](2 -x) , p known ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
• An Optimization problem, saleem
  • Re: An Optimization problem, Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: An Optimization problem, saleem
• Re: Golbal moderation, donstockbauer
• A question in book Concrete Mathematics, LUK
  • Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, William Elliot
    • Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, William Elliot
  • Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, A N Niel
    • Re: A question in book Concrete Mathematics, Denis Feldmann
• Polytopes, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Polytopes, Abstract Dissonance
• A number-theoretic inquiry, joseabdris
  • Re: A number-theoretic inquiry, Robert Israel
• can someone help me out with this problem, sching
• A place for the curious, critical and bored., jonthn
  • Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., Ioannis
  • Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., magic math tricks
  • Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., Ken Pledger
    • Re: A place for the curious, critical and bored., ytyourclothes
• Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Toni Lassila
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Nathan
    • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Nathan
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, mia . mujezinovic
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Virgil
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Can anyone help me prove that the complex field is not ordered?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• Calculus problem, shawn
  • Re: Calculus problem, Harry
  • Re: Calculus problem, skuesey
    • Re: Calculus problem, matt271829-news
    • Re: Calculus problem, qubit101
    • Re: Calculus problem, shawn
  • Re: Calculus problem, matt271829-news
  • Re: Calculus problem, shawn
• Point group symmetry of a labelled graph from automorphism group?, maneesh
• not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene
  • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene
      • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene
      • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
    • Re: not algebraically closed field and polynomial, eugene
• orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene
  • Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Fedor
    • Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene
      • Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Virgil
      • Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, eugene
      • Re: orthogonal matrix+decomposition, Fedor
• route planners, martijn
  • Re: route planners, skuesey
    • Re: route planners, martijn
• elementary proof of FLT, funfpga
  • Re: elementary proof of FLT, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Toni Lassila
  • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham
    • Re: elementary proof of FLT, groebnerbases
      • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham
      • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Proginoskes
      • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham
      • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Proginoskes
  • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: elementary proof of FLT, Chip Eastham
• book or online page on factoring..., Bart
  • Re: book or online page on factoring..., Peter L. Montgomery
  • Re: book or online page on factoring..., Dave Rusin
• Is it identity?, V.Murugan
  • Re: Is it identity?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Is it identity?, Artur
  • Re: Is it identity?, BuddhaThu
    • Re: Is it identity?, BuddhaThu
    • Re: Is it identity?, Dave L. Renfro
• Methods for solving quadratic equations, Dave L. Renfro
• spherical coordinates question, Evan
  • Re: spherical coordinates question, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: spherical coordinates question, matt271829-news
  • Re: spherical coordinates question, gwh
• interesting differential equations problem, rajamohan82
  • Re: interesting differential equations problem, Dave Rusin
  • Re: interesting differential equations problem, Robert Israel
• Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, eugene
  • Re: Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Separable metric space + uncountably many sets, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Chebychev inequality generalisation, eugene
  • Re: Chebychev inequality generalisation, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Chebychev inequality generalisation, eugene
• integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), eugene
  • Re: integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), Robert Israel
  • Re: integral of multiplied by sin(ax) or cos(ax), David C . Ullrich
• Trigonomety Question, carkaci
  • Re: Trigonomety Question, Cap_Kirk
  • Re: Trigonomety Question, A N Niel
• How about using the Web to create a mathematical genome?, mpcohen
• Correlation, lilo
  • Re: Correlation, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: Correlation, Ray Koopman
  • Re: Correlation, Robert Israel
• An integer sequence, eugene
  • Re: An integer sequence, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: An integer sequence, Proginoskes
• super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, ben
  • Re: super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: super simple i'm sure: what does this mean when it say "values" exactly?, Lee Rudolph
• Proofs by induction and infinity, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, jaapsch
  • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Paul
  • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Toni Lassila
    • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Bill Dubuque
  • Field of fractions (was: Re: Proofs by induction and infinity), Peter L. Montgomery
    • Re: Field of fractions (was: Re: Proofs by induction and infinity), Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Proofs by induction and infinity, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
• Statistics Question, Sarah moore
  • Re: Statistics Question, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: Statistics Question, Sarah moore
      • Re: Statistics Question, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: Statistics Question, Robert Israel
  • Re: Statistics Question, Sarah moore
• Does this kind of function exist?, ziman137
  • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, M.J.T. Guy
      • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Michel Hack
      • Re: Does this kind of function exist?, Patrick Coilland
• Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, titus_piezas
  • Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, martin cohen
    • Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Online Mathematics Encyclopedias, titus_piezas
• Nicer proof in basic topology?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, William Elliot
    • Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Nicer proof in basic topology?, William Elliot
• Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Nathan Baulch
  • Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., John Garrideb
  • Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel
    • Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Proginoskes
      • Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel
  • Message not available
    • Re: Help with solving a simple black box of two inputs..., Robert Israel
• optimization, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: optimization, William Elliot
    • Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: optimization, William Elliot
      • Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: optimization, Chip Eastham
      • Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: optimization, Chip Eastham
      • Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: optimization, Chip Eastham
      • Re: optimization, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: optimization, William Elliot
• Off topic: a good one, Larry Hammick
• perelman poincare proof looks really solid, vznuri
  • Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, saebock
  • Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, anothertimeanotherplace
    • Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, Al Mok
      • Re: perelman poincare proof looks really solid, yato90
• solve laplace by fourier transform,, vsgdp
  • Re: solve laplace by fourier transform,, Cap_Kirk
• Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, denis feldmann
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann
  • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Simeon Stefanov
    • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Looking for a surjection or R^2, Simeon Stefanov
• ELO system, sav
  • Re: ELO system, Hans Aberg
• Re: JSH: SF: Does this work?, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: SF: Does this work?, Tim Peters
• Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle
  • Re: Conics - Parabola, Dann Corbit
  • Re: Conics - Parabola, Virgil
  • Re: Conics - Parabola, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle
      • Re: Conics - Parabola, Shaynelle
• looking, jonlyda
• Can you help me calculate the odds?, CoreyWhite
• ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? is this e-problem, Virgil
    • Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine
    • Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? is this e-problem, Alois Steindl
    • Re: ? is this e-problem, Cheng Cosine
• solving a system of linear equations, Roy
  • Re: solving a system of linear equations, Dann Corbit
    • Re: solving a system of linear equations, Roy
      • Re: solving a system of linear equations, Proginoskes
      • Re: solving a system of linear equations, Virgil
  • Re: solving a system of linear equations, Robert Israel
• Re: JSH: SF: Easy math, theory behind the solution, Tim Peters
• A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, John Jones
  • Re: A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: A constructivist's view of numbers and sets, William Elliot
• Fractions, tekhneek
  • Re: Fractions, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Fractions, Bugman
• Cosines, Jules
  • Re: Cosines, A N Niel
    • Re: Cosines, Jules
      • Re: Cosines, Jules
      • Re: Cosines, Gene Ward Smith
• Cool puzzles, Ioannis
• Re: The Numbers Game, fret
  • Re: The Numbers Game, Reef Fish
• Fourier transform, hyderabadblues
  • Re: Fourier transform, david petry
• How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Georg Anton
  • Re: How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Virgil
  • Re: How to calculate (estimate) sigma from lot data, Ray Koopman
• Statistics questions, Sonja Elen Kisa
  • Re: Statistics questions, The Qurqirish Dragon
  • Re: Statistics questions, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Statistics questions, Georg Anton
  • [OT] Re: Statistics questions, Micha Keijzers
    • Re: Statistics questions, Ray Koopman
• how to prove this, Qijun
  • Re: how to prove this, funfpga
    • Re: how to prove this, funfpga
  • Re: how to prove this, Konstantin Syskov
  • Re: how to prove this, Konstantin Syskov
• The secret of series, Mubashir
  • Re: The secret of series, Gottfried Helms
• Re: Series question, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Series question, David C . Ullrich
• exam results, ang1
  • Re: exam results, David Moran
    • Re: exam results, ang1
  • Re: exam results, Dave Seaman
    • Re: exam results, StupidGenius
    • Re: exam results, StupidGenius
• Ulam's Conjecture - proof, slug
• Re: [NT] How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, William Elliot
  • Re: [NT] How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, xan2
      • Re: How many (minimum) arithmetic progressions descompose a set?, martin cohen
• Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato
    • Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Pedal Triangles, Maury Barbato
• fourier series for rectified sine wave, benn4321
  • Re: fourier series for rectified sine wave, David C . Ullrich
• Re: SF: Easy math, theory behind the solution, Jesse F. Hughes
• prove that B[a,b] is not separable., gilevgi
  • Re: prove that B[a,b] is not separable., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: prove that B[a,b] is not separable., David C . Ullrich
• Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, titus_piezas
  • Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, titus_piezas
      • Re: Help with elliptic curve y^2 = p^3-34p^2+225p, Gene Ward Smith
• understanding PDE Problem statement,, quat
  • Re: understanding PDE Problem statement,, Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: understanding PDE Problem statement,, Abstract Dissonance
• Probability, Jackie Chan
  • Re: Probability, Reef Fish
    • Need help with the probability question?, shawnee
      • Re: Need help with the probability question?, William Elliot
      • Re: Need help with the probability question?, Proginoskes
      • Re: Need help with the probability question?, William Elliot
• infinite integral help, quat
  • Re: infinite integral help, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: infinite integral help, quat
• p-Laplacian, don
• Andre Weil and his three conjectures, David Bernier
  • Re: Andre Weil and his three conjectures, Chip Eastham
• Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones
  • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, Justin
  • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, gjedwards
  • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, cody . roux
    • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones
  • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Largest numbers are Fun!, John Jones
• Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, amzoti
    • Re: Mathematica code for an exponential sum graph, Dave L. Renfro
• Re: Curtis' Miracle Octad Generator, PaulHjelmstad
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Curtis' Miracle Octad Generator, PaulHjelmstad
• how to train intuition, flaxroot
  • Re: how to train intuition, John Thingstad
• line eq'n, sizors_1
  • Re: line eq'n, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: line eq'n, sizors_1
      • Re: line eq'n, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: line eq'n, Virgil
  • Re: line eq'n, uberclay
• Discretization on PDEs, Eric
  • Re: Discretization on PDEs, quat
• Referee's Query, Ioannis
• Re: after beginner's algebra, where to?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: after beginner's algebra, where to?, Rufi_Dukes
• PDE solution help, zine_smith
  • Re: PDE solution help, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: PDE solution help, Michael Jørgensen
      • Re: PDE solution help, Torsten Hennig
      • Re: PDE solution help, zine_smith
  • Re: PDE solution help, Abstract Dissonance
• Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Dement
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lot-o-fun
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert Israel
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Nathan
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert Low
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Keith Ramsay
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Virgil
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Does the Calculus rest on Euclid?, Robert J. Kolker
• field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph
  • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, mskirvin
      • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph
      • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, nullgraph
      • Re: field extension Hungerford problem, Arturo Magidin
• Re: projection on L_p norm space., Littldarln
• Combinatorial Probability Question, David B . Chorlian
  • Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Stan Liou
    • Re: Combinatorial Probability Question, Patrick Coilland
• Measure Theory, Lord Protector
  • Re: Measure Theory, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Measure Theory, ArtflDodgr
  • Re: Measure Theory, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Measure Theory, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Measure Theory, smooth
• The most ambitious sudoku ever, hagen
• questions in using fmincom of Matlab, ambra . chow
  • Re: questions in using fmincom of Matlab, José Carlos Santos
• how to understand all the "phism"s, flaxroot
  • Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, Chip Eastham
      • Re: how to understand all the "phism"s, flaxroot
• alternatives to logistic growth, Name And Address Supplied
  • Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Name And Address Supplied
      • Re: alternatives to logistic growth, Torsten Hennig
• Re: Discrete Hyperbolic Surface Model, Narasimham
• Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot
    • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Funny wrong proofs, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Funny wrong proofs, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, JoeS
  • Wrong Reason for the Right Answer; was (Re: Funny wrong proofs), Reef Fish
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, tomhcmi
    • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Funny wrong proofs, David R Tribble
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Virgil
      • Re: Funny wrong proofs, William Elliot
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Kees
  • Re: Funny wrong proofs, Oscar Lanzi III
• Poincare Conjecture proved by Zhu. He used a tool from me., The Free
• ulam's conjecture, drochom
  • Re: ulam's conjecture, Gerry Myerson
• surrogate factoring, gjedwards
  • Re: surrogate factoring, Richard Henry
  • Re: surrogate factoring, Ulrich Diez
    • Re: surrogate factoring, gjedwards
  • Re: surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
    • Re: surrogate factoring, Proginoskes
    • Re: surrogate factoring, gjedwards
  • Re: surrogate factoring, jstevh
    • Re: surrogate factoring, Proginoskes
• Re: bayesians versus frequentists, T.H. Ray
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Toni Lassila
    • Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: bayesians versus frequentists, Toni Lassila
  • Re: bayesians versus frequentists, T.H. Ray
• Renormalization of Equality, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Renormalization of Equality, david petry
    • Re: Renormalization of Equality, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Renormalization of Equality, Han . deBruijn
• [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Mark Garrett
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Larry Lard
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Richard Henry
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Gib Bogle
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Richard Henry
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Mike Kent
  • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Proginoskes
    • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, MTD
    • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Peter Webb
    • Re: JSH [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, N. Silver
    • Re: [ATTENTION] DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: DO NOT REPLY TO JAMES HARRIS!!!!!!!, Proginoskes
• minimal polynomials, Anvita
  • Re: minimal polynomials, Robert Israel
  • Re: minimal polynomials, Timothy Murphy
• Re: CHRISTHOOD 101: I AM JESUS OF NAZARETH REINCARNATED!!, donstockbauer
• ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? Green's func for Helmholtz eqn, rtonyreeder
• div thm,, quat
  • Re: div thm,, karl
    • Re: div thm,, karl
    • Re: div thm,, quat
  • Re: div thm,, Someonekicked
    • Re: div thm,, quat
  • Re: div thm,, Michael Jørgensen
• Re: Guess a number..., Gerry Myerson
• S_n permutation group, bargiax
  • Re: S_n permutation group, Chip Eastham
    • Re: S_n permutation group, bargiax
      • Re: S_n permutation group, Chip Eastham
      • Re: S_n permutation group, bargiax
  • Re: S_n permutation group, Robert Israel
• Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
    • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
  • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, matt271829-news
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Narasimham
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Thomas Mautsch
      • Re: Internal Bisectors of a Triangle, Narasimham
  • sell nfl jerseys, nba jerseys, soccer jerseys,polo t-shirt,bape jeans and b, sell_jerseys
• need help with differential equations, rajamohan82
  • Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham
    • Re: need help with differential equations, widmar
      • Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham
      • Re: need help with differential equations, widmar
  • Re: need help with differential equations, Michael Jørgensen
    • Re: need help with differential equations, Chip Eastham
• differential equation, Fedor
  • Re: differential equation, LuckyOne
  • Re: differential equation, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: differential equation, Ken Pledger
  • Re: differential equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: differential equation, Zdislav V. Kovarik
    • Re: differential equation, kia
• Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Another silly question, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Another silly question, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Another silly question, brian . bargh
      • Re: Another silly question, Robert Israel
      • Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Another silly question, Robert Israel
      • Re: Another silly question, Tony
      • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Another silly question, Reef Fish
    • Re: Another silly question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: Another silly question, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Another silly question, bill
    • Re: Another silly question, Patrick Coilland
• calling mathematica's FindRoot function from an external program, peregrine_falcon12
• stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: stat question, Herman Rubin
    • Re: stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: stat question, Herman Rubin
      • Re: stat question, Robert Israel
      • Re: stat question, syvanen@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: stat question, Olli Lehtonen
• binomial problem?, Computers Guru
  • Re: binomial problem?, Gerry Myerson
• Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel
  • Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Robert Israel
    • Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel
      • Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Holger Merkel
      • Re: f*conj(f) - g*conj(g) = 0, what follows for f/g ?, Robert Israel
• S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss
  • Re: S^1 is differential manifold, LuckyOne
    • Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss
      • Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Meg Weiss
      • Re: S^1 is differential manifold, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, JEMebius
      • Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: S^1 is differential manifold-, LuckyOne
• Can you find this integral for me?, Wood
  • Re: Can you find this integral for me?, David W. Cantrell
    • Re: Can you find this integral for me?, Wood
      • Re: Can you find this integral for me?, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Can you find this integral for me?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Can you find this integral for me?, Gene Ward Smith
• Taxonomy of Cellular Automata, UberPuppy
• Question about Riemann Zeta and poles (Complex Analysis), John Gabbriel
  • Re: Question about Riemann Zeta and poles (Complex Analysis), G. A. Edgar
• algebra: identify function, hhesse
  • Re: algebra: identify function, bert
  • Re: algebra: identify function, G. A. Edgar
  • Re: algebra: identify function, Narasimham
• Lie algebras, representations, Lionel Brits
• why so many proofs look similar, flaxroot
  • Re: why so many proofs look similar, Herman Rubin
• Math Induction Method, Narek Saribekyan
  • Re: Math Induction Method, karl
    • Re: Math Induction Method, hayk
  • Re: Math Induction Method, Jean-Marc Gulliet
  • Re: Math Induction Method, James Waldby
    • Re: Math Induction Method, James Waldby
    • Re: Math Induction Method, Narek Saribekyan
• localization of the already localized ring., Jose Capco
  • Re: localization of the already localized ring., Marc Olschok
  • Re: localization of the already localized ring., Arturo Magidin
• Re: seperated-proper-complete, sjang
  • Re: seperated-proper-complete, Jannick Asmus
• Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Question, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Question, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Question, Ian Parker
      • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, Christian Siebert
      • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Question, Robert Israel
      • Re: Question, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Question, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
      • Re: Question, Ian Parker
  • Re: Question, Christian Siebert
• logistic map equation over Q_p, pgiacome@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: logistic map equation over Q_p, JoeS
• Question on slowly varying functions, ManOfLight
  • Re: Question on slowly varying functions, pego
• Re: intersection, Ulysse from CH
• Re: union of prime ideals, Ulysse from CH
• ZF: Does a minimal spanning set for consistency's undecidability exist?, Dan
  • Re: ZF: Does a minimal spanning set for consistency's undecidability exist?, William Elliot
• ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder
    • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder
      • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine
    • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, rtonyreeder
  • Re: ? derive wave eqn with energy lost, carlos
• Re: ? Maxwell eqn in inhomo media, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? Maxwell eqn in inhomo media, rtonyreeder
• does a mean vector exist?, Jack
  • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Harry
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack
      • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack
      • Re: does a mean vector exist?-, JEMebius
      • Re: does a mean vector exist?- Correction, JEMebius
  • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: does a mean vector exist?, drmwecker
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Jack
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, BuddhaThu
  • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Seán O'Leathlóbhair
    • Re: does a mean vector exist?, kunzmilan
      • Re: does a mean vector exist?, Virgil
• Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: JSH: SF might work, bad luck?, David C . Ullrich
• Re: JSH: Understanding the pathology, Tim Peters
• Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
    • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Bertie Reed
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Larry Lard
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, ezcos
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, marcus_b
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Richard Henry
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Paul Sperry
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Larry Lard
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Moran
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, David Bernier
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
• Basis for Hilbert space, zeros
  • Re: Basis for Hilbert space, mvonkann2000
  • Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Robert Israel
    • Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Ulysse from CH
      • Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Ulysse from CH
  • Re: Basis for Hilbert space, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Business Calculus Problem less the typo, Mkajuma
• Re: business calculus problem, David Moran
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: business calculus problem, Micha Keijzers
• WITM - Web Interface to Mathematica, Dave (from the UK)
• 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults
  • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults
    • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults
      • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults
  • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dave Rusin
    • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dale Shoults
      • Re: 3-Variable Polynomial = Square, Dave Rusin
• Character theory question, g.s.
  • Re: Character theory question, Derek Holt
    • Re: Character theory question, g.s.
• Writing in Circle, Me
  • Re: Writing in Circle, uberclay
    • Re: Writing in Circle, Me
      • Re: Writing in Circle, Sylvain Croussette
      • Re: Writing in Circle, Don Taylor
• Sum, John Stivenson
  • Re: Sum, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Sum, rtonyreeder
• derive this formula, bgold
• Re: Prime ideals of tensor products, Jannick Asmus
• continious function, improper integral+bounded, eugene
  • Re: continious function, improper integral+bounded, A N Niel
  • Re: continious function, improper integral+bounded, The World Wide Wade
• preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, eugene
  • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, eugene
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, A N Niel
    • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Herman Rubin
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: preimage of 0 and C^1 class functions, David C . Ullrich
• Re: looking for good undergrad calculus text, Milah
• I want to learn math..., Pious Audio
  • Re: I want to learn math..., amzoti
  • Re: I want to learn math..., Christopher J. Henrich
  • Re: I want to learn math..., Gerry Myerson
    • Re: I want to learn math..., uberclay
      • Re: I want to learn math..., Gerry Myerson
      • Re: I want to learn math..., uberclay
    • Re: I want to learn math..., Pious Audio
      • Re: I want to learn math..., Dave L. Renfro
• Getting into a top level grad school, daniel . svoboda
  • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, daniel . svoboda
      • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, A N Niel
  • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Dave Rusin
      • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Getting into a top level grad school, pego
• quick ODE question, quat
  • Re: quick ODE question, Ulysse from CH
• inverse fourier xform by convolution, quat
  • Re: inverse fourier xform by convolution, David C . Ullrich
• Fourier Shift Formula, quat
• Simple Complex Number Question, mitch
  • Re: Simple Complex Number Question, rtonyreeder
    • Re: Simple Complex Number Question, mitch
• convex function, Mathias Tausig
• evaluation of limits, naroo
  • Re: evaluation of limits, Mathias Tausig
    • Re: evaluation of limits, G. A. Edgar
• producing a semicharacter, sjang
• Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris
  • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris
      • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Robert Israel
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris
    • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris
      • Re: Distinct perfect squares with equal abundancy indices, joseabdris
• Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, thirty_two69
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, sjang
    • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, David R Tribble
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, David R Tribble
    • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish
    • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Lord Protector
      • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Reef Fish
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Sensei
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, matt271829-news
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Anyone got any good (or bad) mathematical jokes?, Ioannis
• Stitch and stones rules, jt64
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Stitch and stones rules, jt64
  • Stitch and stones rules, jt64
• why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, flaxroot
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, jt64
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, flaxroot
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, MTD
    • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, jerhinesmith
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Reef Fish
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, donstockbauer
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dave Seaman
    • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Richard Tobin
      • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dave Seaman
      • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: why do we distinguish between different kind of inifinity, wkaras
• Difficulty of multiplication and division in the middle ages, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, June 05, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Schrodinger's Equation, mitch
  • Re: Schrodinger's Equation, Matlock
  • Re: Schrodinger's Equation, Dirk Van de moortel
• introductory book on ring / field theory?, yawnmoth
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, William Elliot
    • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, yawnmoth
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Guy Corrigall
    • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, john o goyo
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Lord Protector
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Bruce Ikenaga
    • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: introductory book on ring / field theory?, Gene Ward Smith
• My apologies to James Harris, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: My apologies to James Harris, Lord Protector
  • Re: My apologies to James Harris, mathedman
• Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, yaoziyuan
  • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, yaoziyuan
  • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, Robert Israel
    • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, Pubkeybreaker
      • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conj, fedka
      • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: Fields awardee Shing-Tung Yau lied in Chinese media about Poincare conjecture proof's attribution, qm
• Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, gjedwards
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: But what if I AM right?, Min
• True or False, hellbent4u
  • Re: True or False, Mike Kelly
    • Re: True or False, Ken Pledger
• Question about generation of real numbers, aone1504
  • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, aone1504
      • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Virgil
      • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Robert Israel
      • Re: Question about generation of real numbers, Dave Seaman
• Re: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Victor Eijkhout
  • Re: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Christopher J. Henrich
    • Re: SF: Finally, surrogate factoring, Gib Bogle
• taylor expansion of f(x+h) about x ?, G Patel
  • Re: taylor expansion of f(x+h) about x ?, G Patel
    • Re: taylor expansion of f(x+h) about x ?, rtonyreeder
  • Re: taylor expansion of f(x+h) about x ?, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: taylor expansion of f(x+h) about x ?, Abstract Dissonance
• Re: "Is pleasure rational?", Robert Israel
• Applications of Ergodic thoery., Lord Protector
  • Re: Applications of Ergodic thoery., Robert Israel
    • Re: Applications of Ergodic thoery., Lord Protector
      • Re: Applications of Ergodic thoery., Robert Israel
• Function of a Random Variable, group . fbi
  • Re: Function of a Random Variable, ArtflDodgr
    • Re: Function of a Random Variable, group . fbi
  • Re: Function of a Random Variable, Herman Rubin
• Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Chip Eastham
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Chip Eastham
    • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Bob Terwilliger
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Rupert
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Larry Lard
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, litsohate
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: JSH: Learning consensus, Min
• calculation direction VECTOR, liav . ezer
• Number Theory, Simon Dean
  • Re: Number Theory, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Number Theory, Simon Dean
    • Re: Number Theory, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number Theory, Proginoskes
      • Re: Number Theory, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Number Theory, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Number Theory, fishfry
    • Re: Number Theory, Peter Webb
  • Re: Number Theory, Dement
  • Re: Number Theory, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Dan
  • Re: Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Dan
    • Re: Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Hugo Pfoertner
  • Re: Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Robert Israel
  • Re: Is this triangle number deficient or abundant?, Dan
• Slip Slide Divide Method for Factoring a Binomial, jay1000
• Re: Number Theory text recommendations?, Randall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Number Theory text recommendations?, Dement
• Re: anybody got an IQ over 200 here?, Reef Fish
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: anybody got an IQ over 200 here?, Jesse F. Hughes
• Need help on this probability distribution ?, Xufei . Wang
• Need help on this probability distribution, Xufei . Wang
  • Re: Need help on this probability distribution, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: Need help on this probability distribution, dave
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Need help on this probability distribution, Xufei . Wang
• How and where can i get help in calculus?, TOMERDR
  • Re: How and where can i get help in calculus?, David Moran
    • Re: How and where can i get help in calculus?, Ken Pledger
  • Re: How and where can i get help in calculus?, Lord Protector
• Another mind blank, Heather
  • Re: Another mind blank, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Another mind blank, Heather
      • Re: Another mind blank, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Another mind blank, Gene Ward Smith
• Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, adam
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Mike Kelly
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
  • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Jurjus
    • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Jurjus
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Herman Rubin
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Cantorian pseudomathematics, david petry
• Ptolemy inequality in a prehilbert space, eugene
  • Re: Ptolemy inequality in a prehilbert space, Dement
  • Re: Ptolemy inequality in a prehilbert space, Herman Rubin
    • Re: Ptolemy inequality in a prehilbert space, eugene
• Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco
  • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, victor_meldrew_666
  • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco
      • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco
      • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Hagen
    • Re: Polynomial ring that aren't domains, Jose Capco
• Decompsition of a linear operator., leox
  • Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., Robert Israel
    • Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., leox
      • Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., Robert Israel
  • Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: Decompsition of a linear operator., leox
• basic question about p-adic numbers, Mike
  • Re: basic question about p-adic numbers, JoeS
• early reference for minimization of quadratic form, vanamali
  • Re: early reference for minimization of quadratic form, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: early reference for minimization of quadratic form, vanamali
• Poincare Conjecture proof by Xiping Zhu and Huaidong Cao, Edwin Clark
  • Re: Poincare Conjecture proof by Xiping Zhu and Huaidong Cao, elvira . mayordomo
    • Re: Poincare Conjecture proof by Xiping Zhu and Huaidong Cao, Edwin Clark
• Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, N. Silver
    • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, matt271829-news
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Virgil
    • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Min and max are elementary functions?!, The World Wide Wade
• Inverse function questions, ManOfLight
  • Re: Inverse function questions, The World Wide Wade
• reversible division, flaxroot
  • Re: reversible division, flaxroot
• Inverse of elements in a group, goodchild . trevor
  • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, Brian VanPelt
    • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, goodchild . trevor
      • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, cody . roux
      • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, hale
      • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, goodchild . trevor
  • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, James Dolan
  • Re: Inverse of elements in a group, Arturo Magidin
• Taylor's Theorem, Remainder Term, Luke Wu
  • Re: Taylor's Theorem, Remainder Term, Proginoskes
  • Re: Taylor's Theorem, Remainder Term, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Taylor's Theorem, Remainder Term, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Taylor's Theorem, Remainder Term, Proginoskes
• Spectrum of the Fourier transform, Raymond
  • Re: Spectrum of the Fourier transform, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Spectrum of the Fourier transform-, JEMebius
      • Re: Spectrum of the Fourier transform-, Raymond
      • Re: Spectrum of the Fourier transform-, David C . Ullrich
• Coupled ODE system, David Moran
  • Re: Coupled ODE system, rtonyreeder
    • Re: Coupled ODE system, William Elliot
      • Re: Coupled ODE system, rtonyreeder
  • Re: Coupled ODE system, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Coupled ODE system, William Elliot
  • Re: Coupled ODE system, Igor Khavkine
  • Re: Coupled ODE system, David Moran
• Proof for open sets in R., agapito6314
  • Re: Proof for open sets in R., Someonekicked
    • Re: Proof for open sets in R., William Elliot
  • Re: Proof for open sets in R., Someonekicked
  • Re: Proof for open sets in R., William Elliot
  • Re: Proof for open sets in R., mvonkann2000
    • Re: Proof for open sets in R., agapito6314
  • Re: Proof for open sets in R., David C . Ullrich
• | - oo| ?, agapito6314
  • Re: | - oo| ?, kibby
    • Re: | - oo| ?, agapito6314
• Machine logic (logic of the practical kind), Charlie
  • Re: Machine logic (logic of the practical kind), Atmos
  • Re: Machine logic (logic of the practical kind), David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Machine logic (logic of the practical kind), Charlie
      • Re: Machine logic (logic of the practical kind), dave
• Submodules problem, themadhatter012
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Submodules problem, themadhatter012
    • Re: Submodules problem, Derek Holt
• Re: Common sense, checking of math "proofs", Jesse F. Hughes
• Differentiation of integral with variable limits., Mario_Mardesic
  • Re: Differentiation of integral with variable limits., The World Wide Wade
  • Re: Differentiation of integral with variable limits., Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• About irrational number, Deep
• Half delta operator - iterative root of delta, darrellhaddon
  • Re: Half delta operator - iterative root of delta, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• JSH: For reporters, jstevh
  • Re: For reporters, David Moran
    • Re: For reporters, Proginoskes
      • Re: For reporters, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: For reporters, gjedwards
• notation for vectors and points, pluton
  • Re: notation for vectors and points, wkehowski@xxxxxxx
  • Re: notation for vectors and points, quat
    • Re: notation for vectors and points, pluton
• Some questions about lim..., Tommy
  • Re: Some questions about lim..., The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Some questions about lim..., The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Some questions about lim..., Tommy
      • Re: Some questions about lim..., The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Some questions about lim..., Wynn
      • Re: Some questions about lim..., The World Wide Wade
• Rotational variables problem, Poakfield@xxxxxxx
  • Re: Rotational variables problem, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Rotational variables problem, Poakfield@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Rotational variables problem, Dirk Van de moortel
      • Re: Rotational variables problem, Poakfield@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Rotational variables problem, Dirk Van de moortel
• Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen
  • Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen
  • Re: An ancient sudoku, Phil Carmody
    • Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen
      • Re: An ancient sudoku, hagen
• How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, TOMERDR
  • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, Larry Hammick
  • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, Larry Hammick
    • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, bassam king karzeddin
      • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, cherry
  • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, TOMERDR
      • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: How do i prove that an equation have only one rational root?, Proginoskes
• Results from Laws of Large Numbers & Central Limit Theorem aren't consistent with each other?, cherry
  • Re: Results from Laws of Large Numbers & Central Limit Theorem aren't consistent with each other?, Robert Israel
• " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", Patrick Coilland
  • Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", Dale Shoults
    • Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", Robert Israel
      • Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
      • Re: " Solving the equation 1 -4*h(x)^2 = h( 3*(1-x^2) ) , h unknown ", Patrick Coilland
• ? e-vectors of sum of rank one matrices, Cheng Cosine
• Re: The Lorentz Transformation., rangeravenger
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Lorentz Transformation., The Ghost In The Machine
• PDe by sine xform, quat
• Re: complex division, mmeron
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: complex division, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: complex division, Reef Fish
• JSH: Authority problem, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Authority problem, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: Authority problem, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: JSH: Authority problem, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: Authority problem, donstockbauer
• Virtual Globe 3D in Java: locating points on the Earth's surface, humberto . bortolossi
• I Want To Win The Fields Medal, dear . jjl
  • Re: I Want To Win The Fields Medal, Someonekicked
  • Re: I Want To Win The Fields Medal, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: I Want To Win The Fields Medal, Reef Fish
  • Re: I Want To Win The Fields Medal, Proginoskes
• Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Timothy Murphy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Timothy Murphy
    • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: high/low vector of Lie algebra representation, Jyrki Lahtonen
• Re: Collatz problem, Keith A. Lewis
• Stone-Weierstrass, Matt
  • Re: Stone-Weierstrass, Meredith
  • Re: Stone-Weierstrass, David C . Ullrich
• Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, marcinrak
  • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, Ioannis
    • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, MR
    • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, Ioannis
      • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, MR
      • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, Ioannis
  • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Tayler Expansion of Exp[z] and Exp[z^2] about z=0?, Gene Ward Smith
• subsets of R, Artur
  • Re: subsets of R, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: subsets of R, cody . roux
  • Re: subsets of R, Proginoskes
• why do they say "polynomail in x", TTroy
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", A N Niel
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Axel Harvey
    • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Reef Fish
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", cody . roux
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Reef Fish
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Axel Harvey
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Keith Ramsay
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Reef Fish
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Robert Israel
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Axel Vogt
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Reef Fish
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", jhnrmsdn
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", mzafrullah
  • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Dave Seaman
    • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Reef Fish
      • Re: why do they say "polynomail in x", Dave Seaman
• Row-column-row sort generalized to higher dimensions, jhnrmsdn
  • Re: Row-column-row sort generalized to higher dimensions, Phil Carmody
• MSc in Computer Science, at Bristol or UCL?, eestath
  • Re: MSc in Computer Science, at Bristol or UCL?, Timothy Murphy
• Advice on algorithm/formula needed, ola . mattsson
  • Re: Advice on algorithm/formula needed, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Advice on algorithm/formula needed, Gerard Flanagan
  • Re: Advice on algorithm/formula needed, Proginoskes
• bayes with an extra conditional, lanbo
  • Message not available
    • Re: bayes with an extra conditional, Rob Johnson
      • Re: bayes with an extra conditional, lanbo
• another identifiability question, Sarah
  • Re: another identifiability question, M.J.T. Guy
• Assistance required, nijerian
  • Re: Assistance required, Jorma
• Correlating a change in difference?, skolpojken72
  • Re: Correlating a change in difference?, Abstract Dissonance
• subgroup..., mina_world
  • Re: subgroup..., hale
  • Re: subgroup..., David C . Ullrich
• Make the denominator rational, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: Make the denominator rational, William Elliot
  • Re: Make the denominator rational, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Make the denominator rational, Peter Webb
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Make the denominator rational, Zdislav V. Kovarik
  • Re: Make the denominator rational, jhnrmsdn
    • Re: Make the denominator rational, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, jhnrmsdn
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, Peter L. Montgomery
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Make the denominator rational, Rainer Rosenthal
• differentiating q., zxcv_890
  • Re: differentiating q., Torsten Hennig
• Compact metric space, William Elliot
  • Re: Compact metric space, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Compact metric space, Larry Hammick
    • Re: Compact metric space, Artur
      • Re: Compact metric space, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Compact metric space, Larry Hammick
      • Re: Compact metric space, Artur
  • Re: Compact metric space, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Compact metric space, William Elliot
  • Re: Compact metric space, Artur
  • Re: Compact metric space, Ronald Bruck
• Multiplication on fingers, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Multiplication on fingers, Peter Webb
    • Re: Multiplication on fingers, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
  • Re: Multiplication on fingers, Jens Kruse Andersen
    • Re: Multiplication on fingers, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Multiplication on fingers, Ross Clement (Email address invalid - do not use)
• R^3[T], Jose Capco
  • Re: R^3[T], José Carlos Santos
    • Re: R^3[T], Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: R^3[T], Jose Capco
      • Re: R^3[T], Jyrki Lahtonen
      • Re: R^3[T], Marc Olschok
• Re: image of a proper map, Jiri Lebl
• Re: runge-kutta and euler methods, Dann Corbit
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: runge-kutta and euler methods, Robert Israel
• Is this correct??, Mkajuma
  • Re: Is this correct??, Michael Jørgensen
    • Re: Is this correct??, Proginoskes
  • Re: Is this correct??, Torsten Hennig
• one identifiability question, Sarah
  • Re: one identifiability question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: one identifiability question, Sarah
      • Re: one identifiability question, M.J.T. Guy
• Re: Euler Sum Generalized = Sum With Stirling Number, Gottfried Helms
• Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, phyti
  • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Richard Henry
  • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Fermat
    • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, marian
    • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Robert Israel
    • Re: A New Definition of Prime Number, Pubkeybreaker
• Sixth new law from the premises of syllogism, slwu
• ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Virgil
    • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Virgil
      • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Chip Eastham
      • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Cheng Cosine
      • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, Torsten Hennig
  • Re: ? best approx of matrix of a linear sys, magic math tricks
• Integrating: Point me in the right direction, Juneappal
  • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, Dale Shoults
  • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, jhnrmsdn
    • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, jhnrmsdn
    • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, Virgil
  • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, Juneappal
      • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Integrating: Point me in the right direction, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
• About the projection of a set of vectors, user
• Re: Cantor's diagonal argument, Tapio
  • Re: Cantor's diagonal argument, Ross A. Finlayson
  • Re: Cantor's diagonal argument, Virgil
    • Re: Cantor's diagonal argument, Tapio
• Re: "Collatz 3n+1 conjecture is unprovable" paper, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: "Collatz 3n+1 conjecture is unprovable" paper, Martin Winer
    • Re: "Collatz 3n+1 conjecture is unprovable" paper, Gottfried Helms
• C++ program calling simple mathematica functions, peregrine_falcon12
  • Re: C++ program calling simple mathematica functions, Puppet_Sock
  • Re: C++ program calling simple mathematica functions, Someonekicked
  • Re: C++ program calling simple mathematica functions, Jean-Marc Gulliet
• Collatz Question, bill
  • Re: Collatz Question, martin cohen
    • Re: Collatz Question, bill
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Proginoskes
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, bill
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, bill
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Collatz Question, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Collatz Question, bill
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Collatz Question, bill
    • Re: Collatz Question, Gerry Myerson
• Lie Algebra Classification Question, markh
  • Re: Lie Algebra Classification Question, José Carlos Santos
• is this right about variational calculus, flaxroot
• Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Richard
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Chumley
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Ken Pledger
      • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, matt271829-news
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Don Taylor
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Can the circles of a proportional Venn diagram be calculated ?, matt271829-news
• Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Wanshan Li
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Virgil
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, dwwdkddb
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Proginoskes
    • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Dirk Van de moortel
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1? -, JEMebius
    • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1? -, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: Do you believe 1 = - 1?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• Re: Infinite Knots, zuhair
  • Re: Infinite Knots, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Infinite Knots, zuhair
      • Re: Infinite Knots, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Infinite Knots, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
• Reciprocal of Gamma function, dwwdkddb
  • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, A N Niel
  • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Ulysse from CH
    • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Reef Fish
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Reef Fish
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Reef Fish
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Reef Fish
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Reef Fish
      • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Reciprocal of Gamma function, David C . Ullrich
• Re: A mathematical joke, magic math tricks
  • Re: A mathematical joke, David R Tribble
    • Re: A mathematical joke, magic math tricks
      • Re: A mathematical joke, David R Tribble
      • Re: A mathematical joke, Reef Fish
      • performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: performance enhancing drugs that increase mathematical potency, magic math tricks
      • joke: what is the diff between a mathematician & a crazy bum?, magic math tricks
      • Re: joke: what is the diff between a mathematician & a crazy bum?, Wayne Brown
• Search in equations, northstar
  • Re: Search in equations, Juneappal
    • Re: Search in equations, northstar
      • Re: Search in equations, Virgil
      • Re: Search in equations, northstar
      • Re: Search in equations, bobm
      • Re: Search in equations, Chip Eastham
• Bayesian estimation question??, VijaKhara
  • Re: Bayesian estimation question??, magic math tricks
• Re: strange..., José Carlos Santos
• consulting, Martin
• Re: People's acquired taste for A4 paper size, Mitch
• Re: Versed sine vs. versed cosine, Kaimbridge
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Versed sine vs. versed cosine, Anonyma
• Chain Letter money scheme = exponential growth, instantazn
  • Re: Chain Letter money scheme = exponential growth, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Chain Letter money scheme = exponential growth, Chumley
  • Re: Chain Letter money scheme = exponential growth, mikharakiri_nospaum
    • Re: Chain Letter money scheme = exponential growth, David R Tribble
• Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
  • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie
    • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Ulysse from CH
    • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Volker Boie
      • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), William Elliot
  • Re: Tychonov Groups (topology), Ulysse from CH
• Compact presumption, William Elliot
• Differential forms and Lie groups, John Fredsted
• Re: Functional equation with delta, Patrick Coilland
• DHS CLUB, eleannaf
• Re: Little conjecture, MTD
  • Re: Little conjecture, Jesse F. Hughes
    • Re: Little conjecture, MTD
      • Re: Little conjecture, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: Little conjecture, W. Dale Hall
      • Re: Little conjecture, MTD
      • Re: Little conjecture, W. Dale Hall
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Little conjecture, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: Little conjecture, Han de Bruijn
      • Re: Little conjecture, Patrick Coilland
      • Message not available
      • Re: Little conjecture, Rob Johnson
    • Message not available
      • Re: Little conjecture, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Little conjecture, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: Little conjecture, Bill Dubuque
    • Re: Little conjecture, Rainer Rosenthal
      • Re: Little conjecture, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Little conjecture, Rainer Rosenthal
    • Message not available
      • Re: Little conjecture, Rob Johnson
      • Re: Little conjecture, Bill Dubuque
      • Message not available
      • Re: Little conjecture, Rob Johnson
• Ways to compare two sets of statistics for proximity, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Ways to compare two sets of statistics for proximity, Abstract Dissonance
• Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
  • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news
    • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, matt271829-news
      • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
  • Re: Finding the optimizing distribution, Paul Smith
• topologickal dimension, Karel
  • Re: topologickal dimension, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: topologickal dimension, Karel
    • Re: topologickal dimension, Karel
  • Re: topologickal dimension, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: topologickal dimension, Chip Eastham
    • Re: topologickal dimension, Karel
    • Re: topologickal dimension, William Elliot
      • Re: topologickal dimension, Chip Eastham
      • Re: topologickal dimension, Chip Eastham
      • Re: topologickal dimension, William Elliot
• Convergence problem, Han de Bruijn
  • Re: Convergence problem, Robert Israel
    • Re: Convergence problem, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn
      • Re: Convergence problem, Han . deBruijn
• Re: Little twin prime theorem, Han de Bruijn
• adtetrix.com Place your ads in to the tetrix blocks for 5,000 USD, adtetrix
• Moorehead theorem, gilevgi
  • Re: Moorehead theorem, Larry Hammick
• Re: math equation to simplify ...., Jean-Marc Gulliet
• JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, James Harris
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Larry Lard
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, david petry
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Jesse F. Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Rick Decker
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, MTD
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, gjedwards
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Dik T. Winter
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Christopher J. Henrich
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Chumley
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, martin cohen
    • Re: JSH: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Jesse F. Hughes
  • Re: Mathematicians, a cult of liars, Jorma
• Re: What are the odds of guessing a number between 1 and 20 digits long?, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Pythagoras for right tetrahedrons, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pythagoras for right tetrahedrons, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: Pythagoras for right tetrahedrons, conradeaton
    • Re: Pythagoras for right tetrahedrons, Dale Shoults
      • Re: Pythagoras for right tetrahedrons, Thomas Mautsch
• Re: Crowd mentality, consensus, and fraud, W. Dale Hall
• Re: Question about divergent series, lugita15
  • Re: Question about divergent series, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Question about divergent series, lugita15
      • Re: Question about divergent series, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Question about divergent series, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Question about divergent series, David W . Cantrell
      • Re: Question about divergent series, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Question about divergent series, Herman Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Question about divergent series, vicky
  • Re: Question about divergent series, dwwdkddb
    • Re: Question about divergent series, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Question about divergent series, Gene Ward Smith
• Re: preserve a scalar product, Ryan Reich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: preserve a scalar product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: preserve a scalar product, Ryan Reich
    • Re: preserve a scalar product, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: preserve a scalar product, Ryan Reich
      • Re: preserve a scalar product, Fedor
• "Cryptic Clueless", Blix210@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Chumley
    • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", LuckyOne
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Ken Pledger
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Someonekicked
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Herman Rubin
    • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Lee Rudolph
  • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", jhnrmsdn
    • Re: "Cryptic Clueless", Someonekicked
• Re: Is Maple correct and how does it do that?, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Is Maple correct and how does it do that?, flaxroot
    • Re: Is Maple correct and how does it do that?, flaxroot
• Expected (Mean) Value Question, Leonard M. Wapner
  • Re: Expected (Mean) Value Question, Robert Israel
  • Re: Expected (Mean) Value Question, Reef Fish
    • Re: Expected (Mean) Value Question, Robert Israel
• Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, stephen
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Mike Kelly
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, David R Tribble
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, stephen
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
  • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
    • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Tony Orlow
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, imaginatorium
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
      • Re: Calculus XOR Probability, Virgil
• luckyOne's Delta function, Martin
  • Re: luckyOne's Delta function, LuckyOne
• Re: New version of old cylinder problem, Badger
• Re: Mechanical Engineering at University, peregrine_falcon12
• Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, ldb
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Mitch
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, ldb
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Jussi Piitulainen
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Gottfried Helms
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: A Formula for T^k(n): Was: Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Toni Lassila
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, hale
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Bryan Olson
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Proginoskes
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
      • Re: Another Reason Why Feinstein's Proof is Incorrect, GJ Woeginger
      • Re: Another Reason Why Feinstein's Proof is Incorrect, matt271829-news
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, tommy1729
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, tommy1729
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
    • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, Craig Feinstein
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, T.H. Ray
      • Re: Another Reason Why Collatz is Unprovable, matt271829-news
• Re: Giving a mathematical talk, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Gerry Myerson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Ken Pledger
  • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Proginoskes
  • Re: Giving a mathematical talk, Proginoskes
• Re: How can solutions to DEs have discontinuities?, David C . Ullrich
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How can solutions to DEs have discontinuities?, david petry
• Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, jhnrmsdn
    • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, titus_piezas
      • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, titus_piezas
      • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, titus_piezas
    • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Dik T. Winter
      • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, jhnrmsdn
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Dale Shoults
      • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Dik T. Winter
    • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, Jean-Marc Gulliet
  • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, bassam king karzeddin
  • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, bassam king karzeddin
    • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, titus_piezas
      • Re: Fifth Degree Equation, titus_piezas
• Re: An easy one for you analysts?, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
• Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Phil Carmody
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Dave L. Renfro
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Ken Pledger
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, David R Tribble
    • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Herman Rubin
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Bill Dubuque
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Herman Rubin
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, James Dolan
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Stan Rabinowitz
    • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Herman Rubin
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, BEM
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Myrtle
    • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, David Ames
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Timothy Murphy
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Rainer Rosenthal
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, boggom
    • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Herman Rubin
      • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, boggom
  • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Milah
    • Re: New Advice for 10 year old with Advanced interest in Math, Milah
• Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle, Phil Carmody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: People's acquired taste for the Golden Rectangle, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: Competition problem in number theory, Phil Carmody
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Competition problem in number theory, M.J.T. Guy
  • Re: Competition problem in number theory, bassam king karzeddin