sci.math

• Date Index

---

• Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Are Bessel Functions Transcendental?, Jason Pawloski
• sequence of polynomials, Artur
  • Re: sequence of polynomials, Robert Israel
• Re: maths for programming C++, ma740988
  • Re: maths for programming C++, stush
• memory requirement, wei
• New branch of mathematics, Charlie
  • Re: New branch of mathematics, david petry
  • Re: New branch of mathematics, Chuck Grempu
    • Re: New branch of mathematics, Justin
• Fundamental region for the modular group, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Fundamental region for the modular group, Rupert
• Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy
  • Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, Randy Poe
  • Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy
    • Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Degrees of freedom = # constraints ?, TTroy
• In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, lataianu bogdan
  • Re: In which (ordered) spaces an increasing sequence has a limit?, Robert Israel
• Another complex analysis question, James
• scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, xyz91234
  • Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, A N Niel
    • Re: scalar functions on non-diagonalizable matrices, xyz91234
• Complex analysis question, James
  • Re: Complex analysis question, eugene
    • Re: Complex analysis question, Robert Israel
  • Re: Complex analysis question, david petry
• Exponential Growth/Decay, Computers Guru
  • Re: Exponential Growth/Decay, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Exponential Growth/Decay, Computers Guru
• " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", Patrick Coilland
  • Message not available
    • Re: " f o f = g ; f a half effect of g ", matt271829-news
• Intersection between a small and great circle, christriddle
  • Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, Robert Israel
  • Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news
    • Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news
    • Re: Intersection between a small and great circle, matt271829-news
• Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Mathieu Group M12,
    • Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad
      • Re: Mathieu Group M12, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad
• Quasi chinese remainder theorem, Jose Capco
  • Re: Quasi chinese remainder theorem, Jose Capco
• symmetry in eigenvectors, Al
  • Re: symmetry in eigenvectors, A N Niel
  • Re: symmetry in eigenvectors, Chip Eastham
  • Re: symmetry in eigenvectors-, JEMebius
• approximating infinite linear programming problems, diegotorquemada
• Finding a Web Design Development with a Good Results, lbardagol
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, July 17, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, mathedman
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David Moran
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, johnjo
    • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, John Schutkeker
      • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Jeremy Boden
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Robert Israel
  • "useful" math, Herman Rubin
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, Justin
  • Re: Household Use for Trigonometry?, David Bernier
• sum((1+r)^(-t))=integral(exp(-r t)), vjp2 . at
• Distribution of Goldbach pairs as even integers n increases, stargene@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Distribution of Goldbach pairs as even integers n increases, Jens Kruse Andersen
• Reducing P to NP-complete, ahuznot
  • Re: Reducing P to NP-complete, Proginoskes
• Re: Argumentum ad hominem, T.H. Ray
• JSH: Continuing puzzle, jstevh
  • Re: Continuing puzzle, David Moran
    • Re: Continuing puzzle, Proginoskes
      • Re: Continuing puzzle, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Chuck Grempu
  • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Rupert
  • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, fishfry
  • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Gib Bogle
    • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, Larry Lard
  • Re: JSH: Continuing puzzle, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Continuing puzzle, Chuck Grempu
    • Re: Continuing puzzle, Rick Decker
• career opportunities in mathematics...., raza
  • Re: career opportunities in mathematics...., mathwiz
• Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Narasimham
  • Re: Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Robert Israel
    • Re: Conic section Edge Flattened Curves, Narasimham
• simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Luke Wu
  • Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Robert Israel
    • Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Luke Wu
      • Re: simple DE/IVP, or is it?, Robert Israel
• A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Juryu
  • Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: A contour integral - sin(x)/sqrt(x), Juryu
• Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu
  • Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Robert Israel
    • Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu
      • Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Robert Israel
      • Re: Cauchy estimates problem: |f(z)| < exp(|z|^n)., Juryu
• Operator Overloading (Sets and Numbers), Doug Goncz
  • Re: Operator Overloading (Sets and Numbers), fishfry
• A problem related to equidistribution., muyu
  • Re: A problem related to equidistribution., Gerry Myerson
  • Re: A problem related to equidistribution., Robert Israel
• Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Determination of Vertices of a Subspace, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
• MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless
  • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", bert
    • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless
      • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody
      • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless
      • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody
  • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Phil Carmody
  • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Gottfried Helms
    • Re: MathWorld article "Sophie Germain prime", Nameless
• Comments?, rrw050
  • Re: Comments?, José Carlos Santos
• [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, trivecteur
  • Re: [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic,
    • Re: Normal => Characteristic, trivecteur
      • Re: Normal => Characteristic,
    • Re: [Group Theory] Normal => Characteristic, Jim Heckman
• Re: Wumpus math: Three-coloring a dodecahedron, Oscar Lanzi III
• A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun
  • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Proginoskes
    • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Proginoskes
  • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Patrick Coilland
    • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun
      • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: A mathematical game - probability questions, Alun
• a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms
    • Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms
  • Re: a basic question concerning zeta-function/zeta-zeroes, Gottfried Helms
• *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz
  • Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz
  • Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Robert Israel
    • Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Doug Goncz
  • Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: *unique* prime factorizations; the fundamental theorem of arithmetic, Proginoskes
• Re: JSH: Latest factoring idea is crap, Tim Peters
• power series, bill
  • Re: power series, Narcoleptic Insomniac
• "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", disabledmanneedshelp
  • Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", donstockbauer
  • Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", Justin
    • Re: "Help A Disabled Man's Dream Come True", donstockbauer
• Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Sylvain Croussette
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Jürgen Ren
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, ben
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • [] Rotations - why are they not vectors, William Elliot
      • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, abe . buckingham
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Message not available
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
  • Message not available
    • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Terry Padden
  • Re: Rotations - why are they not vectors, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
• derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, castertroy14
  • Re: derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: derivation of relativistic kinetic energy, G.E. Ivey
• Linear algebra txtbk recommendations..., Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Linear algebra txtbk recommendations..., alex . lupas
• Three practice algebra qual problems, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, karlfredrickson
  • Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Snis Pilbor
    • Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Robert Israel
  • Re: Three practice algebra qual problems, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
• "proportional", G Patel
  • Re: "proportional", mathman
    • Re: "proportional", William Elliot
      • Re: "proportional", matt271829-news
      • Re: "proportional", William Elliot
      • Re: "proportional", mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "proportional", Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: "proportional", William Elliot
      • [OT] USENETiquette; was: Re: "proportional", Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: [OT] USENETiquette; was: Re: "proportional", mathman
• philosophy of mathematics means a great!, salirp
  • Re: philosophy of mathematics means a great!, Gottfried Helms
• convergence of probability measures, pkg
• origin-fixing isometry, Sean McIlroy
  • Re: origin-fixing isometry, William Elliot
• The Riemann Hypothesis Revisited, Ivan Iliev
• Re: Steiner Systems, PaulHjelmstad
• Reductions within P [complexity], ahuznot
• The elliptic function F(cos(theta)), John Schutkeker
  • Re: The elliptic function F(cos(theta))-, JEMebius
• More on combinatorics, Whatever5k
  • Re: More on combinatorics, matt271829-news
    • Re: More on combinatorics, Whatever5k
      • Re: More on combinatorics, matt271829-news
• Analytic function on open disk, James
  • Re: Analytic function on open disk, eugene
  • Re: Analytic function on open disk, A N Niel
    • Re: Analytic function on open disk, David C . Ullrich
• Analytic on C - {0}, James
  • Re: Analytic on C - {0}, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Analytic on C - {0}, Lot-o-fun
• Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud
  • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Randy Poe
    • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Randy Poe
      • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud
      • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Yecloud
      • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Help: Exchange of limit and expectation, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland
  • Re: A contest problem, ww
    • Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland
      • Message not available
      • Re: A contest problem, Patrick Coilland
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: A contest problem, Oscar Lanzi III
• help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
  • Re: help inCalculating APR, Arthur Dent
  • Re: help inCalculating APR, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news
    • Re: help inCalculating APR, Arthur Dent
    • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
    • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, tonyjeffs
      • Re: help inCalculating APR, matt271829-news
• Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Jose Capco
  • Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Hans Aberg
  • Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, Jose Capco
      • Re: Tensor product and coproduct in rings, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
• Finite cyclic semigroups, David
• metric spaces, bill
  • Re: metric spaces, William Elliot
    • Re: metric spaces, William Elliot
    • Re: metric spaces, bill
      • Re: metric spaces, William Elliot
      • Re: metric spaces, bill
      • Re: metric spaces, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: metric spaces, William Elliot
• Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, eugene
  • Re: Rank of a matrix with bounded elements, eugene
• continuity&metric spaces, bill
  • Re: continuity&metric spaces, José Carlos Santos
• span of matrices, karlfredrickson
• Why is e used as natural log, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Why is e used as natural log, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Why is e used as natural log, Fermat
  • Re: Why is e used as natural log, The Ghost In The Machine
• gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Doug Goncz
  • Re: gcd, lcm, and notation for same, Doug Goncz
• calculte probility, Bopar
  • Re: calculte probility, matt271829-news
    • Re: calculte probility, Bopar
      • Re: calculte probility, matt271829-news
  • Re: calculte probility, Arthur Dent
• (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz
  • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, stush
    • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, A N Niel
  • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Tim Peters
    • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Virgil
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Tim Peters
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Doug Goncz
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: (factors of x) /\ (factors of x-1) = the null set?, William Elliot
• (humor) Another hand-waving incredibly simple proof of FLT, Doug Goncz
• Iterative solution to non-linear equations, laniik
  • Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, laniik
      • Message not available
      • Re: Iterative solution to non-linear equations, Jim Rockford
• Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior
  • Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, fishfry
  • Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior
  • Re: Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior
  • Easier solution to wiles´ one to the fermat congruence, elcaminodelbudainterior
• Golay codes, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Golay codes-, JEMebius
• thesis about singapore math, clau
  • Re: thesis about singapore math, Karl M. Bunday
    • Re: thesis about singapore math, clau
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • thesis about singapore math, clau
• Inverses in Geometric Algebra, Rob Arthan
• Ten all-time most influential math books, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, bert
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Karl M. Bunday
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Ten all-time most influential math books, Pubkeybreaker
• Re: I own the cybernetics corp now., plasticsunrise
• Re: Numerical differentiation formulas?, Rouben Rostamian
• Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau
  • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau
      • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Help! thesis about singaporean math, clau
• What are the classics?, plasticsunrise
  • Re: What are the classics?, amzoti
    • Re: What are the classics?, sunrise
      • Re: What are the classics?, bert
      • Re: What are the classics?, sunrise
      • Re: What are the classics?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: What are the classics?, Robert Israel
• Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Robert Israel
    • Re: Sets with redundant elements and UPF, Doug Goncz
• L^p question, James
  • Re: L^p question, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: L^p question, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: L^p question, Jules
• Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty
  • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel
    • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty
      • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel
      • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Eighty
      • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel
      • Re: Probability to find a substring in a string, Robert Israel
• Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
    • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, James Waldby
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush
    • Message not available
      • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush
      • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, Paul Nutteing (valid email address in post script )
      • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush
      • Re: Name of algorithm for pairwise comparison ?, stush
• Combinatorics, Whatever5k
• question regarding a series, Whatever5k
  • Re: question regarding a series, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: question regarding a series, The Last Danish Pastry
• Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani
  • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani
      • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Dhandapani
    • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Rupert
      • Re: Quadratic elements of GF(p^n), Gerry Myerson
• The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, martin cohen
    • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Pubkeybreaker
    • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Proginoskes
  • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Felix Rawlings
    • Re: The James Harris Tribute Page, Abstract Dissonance
• Divisibility rule for 7, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Christian Siebert
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Phil Carmody
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Thomas Mautsch
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Dann Corbit
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes
      • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Christian Siebert
      • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Robert Israel
      • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Robert Israel
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, N. Silver
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Oscar Lanzi III
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Proginoskes
      • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Phil Carmody
  • Re: Divisibility rule for 7, Dale Shoults
• The three times table, The Last Danish Pastry
  • Re: The three times table, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: The three times table, Phil Carmody
    • Re: The three times table, gwh
• why is 11 not oneteen?, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Rod
    • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, sttscitrans
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, stush
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?-, JEMebius
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Larry Lard
    • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Narasimham
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Robert J. Kolker
    • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Michael Orion
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Robert Israel
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, tactics
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Tapio
    • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Tapio
      • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Phil Carmody
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, draccarlawpet
  • Re: why is 11 not oneteen?, Oscar Lanzi III
• Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, donstockbauer
  • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Narasimham
    • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, mathman
  • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Robert J. Kolker
  • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, matt271829-news
    • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is 90º?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Where on earth can you find a triangle each of whose interior angles is, gwh
• analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world
  • Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., José Carlos Santos
    • Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world
      • Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., José Carlos Santos
      • Re: analysis with uniform convergence.., mina_world
• Truncating primes, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert
    • Re: Truncating primes, Rajnish Kumar
  • Re: Truncating primes, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert
      • Re: Truncating primes, Jens Kruse Andersen
      • Re: Truncating primes, Christian Siebert
      • Re: Truncating primes, Jens Kruse Andersen
• conversion btn Weierstrass and Jacobi elliptic function, mathlover
  • Re: conversion btn Weierstrass and Jacobi elliptic function, Badger
• Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac
    • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac
      • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Achilleas D Palamiotis
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
    • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Narcoleptic Insomniac
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Robert Israel
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
  • Re: Any Integer with the sum of its' divisors deficient by (2), Dan
• JSH: Another possibility, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Another possibility, Bob Terwilliger
  • Re: JSH: Another possibility, Mike Kelly
• Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith
  • Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Virgil
    • Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith
  • Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Groups: Even/Odd Permutations, Chris Smith
• permutation group automorphisms, joseph rivers
  • Re: permutation group automorphisms, mskirvin
    • Re: permutation group automorphisms, mskirvin
  • Re: permutation group automorphisms, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: permutation group automorphisms, joseph rivers
      • Re: permutation group automorphisms, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: permutation group automorphisms, Jim Heckman
    • Re: permutation group automorphisms, Jim Heckman
• Prine Number thought experiment, robert.w.adams@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Prine Number thought experiment, Proginoskes
• Need an algorithm, Dave
  • Re: Need an algorithm, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Need an algorithm, Dave
      • Re: Need an algorithm, Chip Eastham
• JSH: My working theory on the psychology, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, jshsucks
  • Re: My working theory on the psychology, Chuck Grempu
  • Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: My working theory on the psychology, Proginoskes
• ? matrix with function entries, Cheng Cosine
• Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, brainslaugh
  • Re: Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, Robert Israel
    • Re: Integral of the intersection of two Gaussians, Han de Bruijn
• Re: The White Box, fishfry
• Convergence of series, David Sevilla
  • Re: Convergence of series, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Convergence of series, Robert Israel
• Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, eugene
  • Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Maximal dimension + subspace of invertible matrices, Robert Israel
• Squares, Gerry
  • Re: Squares, Lathaea
    • Re: Squares, Gerry
  • Re: Squares, Robert Israel
    • Re: Squares, Gerry
      • Re: Squares, Robert Israel
      • Re: Squares, Gerry
      • Re: Squares, Gerry
      • Re: Squares, Robert Israel
      • Re: Squares, Gerry
      • Re: Squares, Phil Carmody
      • Re: Squares, Gerry
• Factoring c-1, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Factoring c-1, bert
  • Re: Factoring c-1, stush
  • Re: Factoring c-1, Tim Peters
    • Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz
      • Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Tim Peters
      • Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz
      • Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, Doug Goncz
      • Re: Sets of divisors, sizes, complements, unions, intersections, bert
• Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom
  • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Robert Israel
  • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Ben Rudiak-Gould
    • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom
      • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Robert Israel
      • Re: Turing vs. Godel (Newbie Question) (A simple example), Tom
• distance between sets, diegotorquemada
  • Re: distance between sets, step_y
  • Re: distance between sets, Dave L. Renfro
• How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, csimon
  • Re: How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, matt271829-news
    • Re: How to write a normalisation depending on the domain of a function, csimon
• DFT of a Gaussian, csimon
• Full body massages for stress and muscle tension relief. Cleveland Ohio (Serious), massotherapybyrob
• Set Theory: Should you believe?, Norman Wildberger
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gonçalo Rodrigues
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, david petry
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Herring
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, kunzmilan
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Robert J. Kolker
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Jiri Lebl
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, imaginatorium
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Ben Rudiak-Gould
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, stephen
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, cbrown
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, lDontBother
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Henry
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Peter Webb
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Richard Henry
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, george
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Hatto von Aquitanien
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
    • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Virgil
      • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, Lester Zick
  • Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?, T.H. Ray
• A=B*C how to get B?, meris300
  • Re: A=B*C how to get B?, Toni Lassila
  • Re: A=B*C how to get B?, Randy Poe
    • Re: A=B*C how to get B?, meris300
• platonic solids, Sean McIlroy
  • Re: platonic solids, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: platonic solids, A N Niel
    • Re: platonic solids, Sean McIlroy
      • Re: platonic solids, Proginoskes
      • Re: platonic solids, Michael Stemper
      • Re: platonic solids, Proginoskes
  • Re: platonic solids, Jim Heckman
• quasiconvex functions, John
  • Message not available
    • Re: quasiconvex functions, John
      • Re: quasiconvex functions, Robert Israel
      • Re: quasiconvex functions, John
      • Re: quasiconvex functions, Robert Israel
      • Re: quasiconvex functions, John
• Newton's formula, kunzmilan
• Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Absorbing sets, donstockbauer
  • Re: Absorbing sets, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Absorbing sets, Robert Israel
      • Re: Absorbing sets, José Carlos Santos
      • Re: Absorbing sets, David C . Ullrich
• Military logistic problem, christriddle
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Military logistic problem, christriddle
    • Re: Military logistic problem, christriddle
• A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Achilleas D Palamiotis
  • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Proginoskes
    • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, bert
      • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Dann Corbit
      • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, bert
      • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, mike4ty4
  • Re: A POSSIBLE FACTORING ALGORITHM, John Schutkeker
• my current problmee, Clamb
  • Re: my current problmee, Robert Israel
• how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, brainslaugh
  • Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, Ray Koopman
  • Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, Han de Bruijn
    • Re: how to rotate a multivariate Gaussian, brainslaugh
• A question on Spec Z[x], canadan
  • Re: A question on Spec Z[x], mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
• Dirac delta with complex argument, vv
  • Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Volker Boie
  • Re: Dirac delta with complex argument, Hans Aberg
• Hard analysis problem (epsilon deltas), Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Hard analysis problem (epsilon deltas), David C . Ullrich
• Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Period of random number generators, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz
    • Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham
  • Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz
    • Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz
      • Re: Period of random number generators, Chip Eastham
      • Re: Period of random number generators, Doug Goncz
• Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie
  • Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie
      • Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, melanie
      • Re: Question from an old algebraic topology qualifying exam, Lee Rudolph
• JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, willo_thewisp
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Chuck Grempu
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Way too interesting, David Moran
    • Re: Way too interesting, jstevh
      • Re: Way too interesting, David Moran
      • Re: Way too interesting, Proginoskes
      • Re: Way too interesting, jstevh
      • Re: Way too interesting, Chuck Grempu
  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mike4ty4
    • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, mike4ty4
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Dann Corbit
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Way too interesting, Proginoskes
• What happened to the Wolfram site?, amzoti
  • Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, William Elliot
  • Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, david petry
    • Re: What happened to the Wolfram site?, Ronald Bruck
• Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, google03
  • Re: Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Name of chapter dependency diagrams sought, mariano.suarezalvarez@xxxxxxxxx
• Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla
  • Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla
      • Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Question about modular function related to the projective line, David Sevilla
• Product of matrices of zero trace, eugene
  • Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, Lee Rudolph
  • Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, Robert Israel
    • Re: Product of matrices of zero trace, eugene
• Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
  • Re: Probability question - please help!, imbibe
    • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
  • Re: Probability question - please help!, James Waldby
    • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
    • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, Randy Poe
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, James Waldby
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
    • Message not available
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
    • Message not available
      • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
    • Re: Probability question - please help!, Zerex71
• Re: Integrals, mathman
  • Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato
    • Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Integrals, Maury Barbato
    • Re: Integrals, David C . Ullrich
• precedence of negation and times, zxcv_890
  • Re: precedence of negation and times, matt271829-news
    • Re: precedence of negation and times, Proginoskes
    • Re: precedence of negation and times, zxcv_890
      • Re: precedence of negation and times, Proginoskes
      • Re: precedence of negation and times, matt271829-news
    • Re: precedence of negation and times, A N Niel
      • Re: precedence of negation and times, Virgil
  • Re: precedence of negation and times, Robert Israel
• Affine spaces as posets, hermann
  • Re: Affine spaces as posets, William Elliot
• Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv
  • Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, Ronald Bruck
    • Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv
  • Message not available
    • Re: Quadratic eigenvalue problem, rjfmv
• Sudoku question, Frank Palmer
  • Re: Sudoku question, Randy Poe
    • Re: Sudoku question, Rob Pratt
  • Re: Sudoku question, Gib Bogle
• Algebra problem, Jake Mulch
  • Re: Algebra problem, Frank Palmer
• Another nice mean value like theorem, eugene
  • Re: Another nice mean value like theorem, eugene
    • Re: Another nice mean value like theorem, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Another nice mean value like theorem, Robert Israel
• non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, fishfry
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Helmut Richter
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ken Pledger
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, gowan4@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Patrick Coilland
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Toni Lassila
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ben
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Dave Seaman
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, sttscitrans
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Robert Israel
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Dave Seaman
      • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Stephen J. Herschkorn
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, sttscitrans
    • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Marc Olschok
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Ronald Bruck
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, William Elliot
  • Re: non-reflexive symmetric and transitive relations, Bill Taylor
• Simplifying Algebraic expression, Jeffrey Spoon
  • Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, amzoti
    • Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Jeffrey Spoon
  • Re: Simplifying Algebraic expression, Badger
• Mathematical modeling of Orkut, Ben
• Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
  • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, eugene
    • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, eugene
  • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
    • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, The World Wide Wade
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Absolutely continuous, L^2 question, James
• perhps it is end of the struggle, Student of Math
  • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, ashu_1559
    • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, donstockbauer
      • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, John Schutkeker
  • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, gjedwards
  • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, Proginoskes
  • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, fernando revilla
  • Re: perhps it is end of the struggle, stush
• The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, Doug Goncz
  • Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, William Elliot
  • Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, hagman
  • Re: The gcd of a set A, and of P, the set of primes, Tim Peters
• Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene
  • Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, Torsten Hennig
    • Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene
  • Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Analytic with mean bounds in circles, eugene
• Equations, Rahul
• Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz
  • Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz
    • Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Clifford Numbers in Mathcad, Doug Goncz
• Modular Arithmetic, J. B. Wood
  • Re: Modular Arithmetic, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Modular Arithmetic, William Elliot
  • Re: Modular Arithmetic, fishfry
  • Re: Modular Arithmetic, Tim Peters
  • Re: Modular Arithmetic, Phil Carmody
• Fourier theory help, Abstract Dissonance
  • Re: Fourier theory help, Abstract Dissonance
• Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, WhytheQ
  • Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Jonathan Hoyle
    • Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, WhytheQ
      • Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Probability: Ace of Spades from a pack of cards, Randy Poe
• Discrete mathematical modeling of Orkut, Ben
• need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, boris
  • Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, boris
    • Re: need help: automorphisms of the complex number field, jcsantos
• Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Chuck Grempu
      • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, David Moran
    • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues, Tim Peters
• JSH: Surprised even me, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, guenther vonKnakspot
    • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu
  • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, amzoti
  • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chip Eastham
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes
  • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, willo_thewisp
    • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, willo_thewisp
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu
      • Re: JSH: Surprised even me, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • JSH: Surprised even me, CapCity
  • Re: Surprised even me, Chuck Grempu
• Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday
  • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday
  • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Ken Pledger
    • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Proginoskes
    • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday
  • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Fermat
    • Re: Seeking Beautiful Single-Variable Calculus Problems, Karl M. Bunday
• How to determine phase of m-sequence, Steve W
• Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters
  • Re: JSH: Now what?, jstevh
    • Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Now what?, gjedwards
      • Re: JSH: Now what?, Chuck Grempu
      • Re: JSH: Now what?, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Now what?, gjedwards
• JSH: Bunch of actors, jstevh
  • Re: Bunch of actors, Chuck Grempu
  • Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance
    • Re: Bunch of actors, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Bunch of actors, gwh
      • Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance
      • Re: Bunch of actors, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Bunch of actors, cbrown
      • Re: Bunch of actors, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Bunch of actors, Abstract Dissonance
• Another Galois theory problem, Doug B
  • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
  • Re: Another Galois theory problem, magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Timothy Murphy
  • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Jim Heckman
  • Re: Another Galois theory problem, jmilne
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Another Galois theory problem, Doug B
    • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Doug B
      • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Doug B
      • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Another Galois theory problem, Arturo Magidin
• JSH: Is it possible?, jstevh
  • Re: Is it possible?,