Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- From: "Gene Ward Smith" <genewardsmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Jun 2006 16:31:40 -0700
Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com wrote:
Magnitudes certainly are not real numbers. They have no operators.
They have no sign.
Magnitudes can be equated with he nonnegative real numbers, closed
under addition and multiplication, which certainly are operators. The
positive reals are closed under inverses and square roots also, and are
a group under multiplication.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- References:
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- From: Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
- Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- Prev by Date: Re: Cayley-Hamilton theorem
- Next by Date: Re: Cayley-Hamilton theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- Next by thread: Re: Is magnitude more fundamental than the real numbers?
- Index(es):