Ultimatum Game
- From: "Savihammas" <Bezdomnyi_16@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Jul 2006 02:44:50 -0700
A quote from wikipedia:
"The ultimatum game is an experimental economics game in which two
parties interact anonymously and only once, so reciprocation is not an
issue. The first player proposes how to divide a sum of money with the
second party. If the second player rejects this division, neither gets
anything. If the second accepts, the first gets her demand and the
second gets the rest."
I would divide like this: I would take 50% of the money, because
2nd player
cant hope more than 50%. I would give 50% of the remaining to the 2nd
player, because
I cant hope to get more than 50% of the remaining. Continuing like this
I get 2/3 and 2nd player 1/3 of the money. How fair is the division?
Game theory predicts that one should give as little as possible to
the 2nd player, if
the players are rational. Simulations with people suggest fairly even
divisions. Assume
that there is one more dollar to divide and already 1st player has 500
and 2nd player 250. It seems that 1st player has a lot more to lose
than 2nd player, so I would expect 1st player to hesitate, before
trying to keep the last dollar himself.
Rationally it seems that 1st player takes as much as possible, as
it is rational for
the 2nd player to accept unfair division, but I think it is not 1st
player's best interest to
propose unfair deal.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Ultimatum Game
- From: fishfry
- Re: Ultimatum Game
- Prev by Date: Re: What annoys you in mathematical text?
- Next by Date: Re: Continued Fractions
- Previous by thread: How to measure the size of Universe!
- Next by thread: Re: Ultimatum Game
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|