Re: What can be said about e?
- From: "G. A. Edgar" <edgar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 02 Jul 2006 18:10:41 -0400
This reminds me of another question: Is there any obvious reason why
exp(x) should be equal to e^x for some number e? For example, why does
the above definition happen to satisfy the relationships we would
expect for powers, such as exp(a)*exp(b) = exp(a+b), exp(a)^b =
exp(a*b) etc. Sure you can show these relationships by applying brute
force to the series definition, but I'm talking about something much
simpler - something that follows in an intuitively clear way from some
definition of exp.
The identities follow from the DE: exp(x) is the unique solution to
y'=y, y(0)=1.
--
G. A. Edgar http://www.math.ohio-state.edu/~edgar/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: What can be said about e?
- From: Stephen Montgomery-Smith
- Re: What can be said about e?
- References:
- What can be said about e?
- From: Hatto von Aquitanien
- Re: What can be said about e?
- From: Oscar Lanzi III
- Re: What can be said about e?
- From: matt271829-news
- What can be said about e?
- Prev by Date: Re: What can be said about e?
- Next by Date: Re: Is SQUFOF efficient?
- Previous by thread: Re: What can be said about e?
- Next by thread: Re: What can be said about e?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|