Re: JSH: SF: New factoring method

Tim Peters wrote:
Sorry, this has gotten too lame to bother continuing with.

Yes, it was lame. But then again, nobody asked for your opinion.

Just a comment and an answer:

Great. That means I get in the last word.


[mensanator@xxxxxxx]
...
But you questioned my statement...

Specifically the "most asinine statement I've ever heard"" part. It wasn't,
and you know it. If this isn't just arguing for the sake of flapping your
gums now, I can't tell the difference.

So now it's simply a case of your criticizing the hyperbole.
Good lesson in backpedaling.


[Tim]
...
Let's keep that "perhaps" in mind.

What "perhaps" are you talking about?

The one you snipped twice in your reply:

[you]
>> And my point was that perhaps the #3 replies lead to an overall
^^^^^^^
>> decrease in replies of all kind.

[me]
"Perhaps" isn't really consistent with "the most asinine statement
^^^^^^^
I've ever heard" ;-)

>> And that implies that the #3 replies, while themselves are noise,
>> lessen the overall noise.

> Let's keep that "perhaps" in mind.


But you knew that too.

Duh. I noticed you just now snipped the part where I criticized
you for your previous snipping, where you pretended not to see
the obvious because you had snipped it. Just out of curiosity,
who do you think you're fooling with these tactics? Oh wait,
you're through with lame arguments, so I'll answer for you:
you're not fooling anyone as the originals are archived on Google.

I guess my little lesson sailed right over your head.

Or, if you didn't, I'd rather argue with JSH ;-)

Be my guest.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Overheard on the scanner
    ... Unfortunately, many messages that I mark as needing replies, I never ... Especially when the requester is not at all ... Voyager is more efficient in some sense, it's arguably not a vehicle, ... Lame, lame, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.fandom)
  • Re: (Not quite) Cantors diagonal proof
    ... > Please read the replies to you made by Tim Peters, Dave Seaman, Daniel ... The second "disproof" was in honor of James Harris. ... Method fails on rational numbers. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: (Not quite) Cantors diagonal proof
    ... > Please read the replies to you made by Tim Peters, Dave Seaman, Daniel ... The second "disproof" was in honor of James Harris. ... Method fails on rational numbers. ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Best CDR burning software
    ... You won't get much help with replies like that... ... Don Burnette ... > can you speak english? ... > go back to your wormhole and dont bother posting lame replies ...
    (microsoft.public.windowsxp.general)
  • Re: OT What? No comments on Coulters comments to Deutsch?
    ... 10/12 7:02 on my reader. ... This is such a lame attempt for you to get some attention on a topic ... There was no replies for you to read! ...
    (alt.autos.toyota)
Loading