Re: algebra with order.
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 17:17:40 +0000 (UTC)
In article <e8gg41$pro$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
mina_world <mina_world@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
hello sir~
i know the next contents.
let G be an abelian group and
let H and K be finite cyclic subgroups with |H|=r and
|K|=s.
if H=<a>, K=<b>, |ab| = lcm(r,s).
Assuming |ab| means the order of the element ab, this is false.
Take H=K, b=a^{-1}.
------------------------------------------------
if
G be an group.
|<a>| =r, |<b>| = s for some a, b in G.
ab = ba.
then, |ab| = lcm(r,s).
This is a complete nonsequitur.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes")
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: algebra with order.
- From: mina_world
- Re: algebra with order.
- References:
- algebra with order.
- From: mina_world
- algebra with order.
- Prev by Date: Re: Existential, Universal Quantifiers, Generalize Booleans
- Next by Date: Re: order of a number mod p ?
- Previous by thread: algebra with order.
- Next by thread: Re: algebra with order.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|