JSH: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- From: jstevh@xxxxxxx
- Date: 5 Jul 2006 21:16:20 -0700
The problem I have here is that modern people calling themselves
mathematicians definitely know how to play political games.
I've watched them played out over the years since I found the short
proof of Fermat's Last Theorem.
If I didn't demonstrate that some of you have a complete contempt for
mathematics and a contempt for the welfare of others, then it might
have been possible for some of you to be convincing in continuing to
lie about your real role and motivations in blocking the intellectual
progress of civilization in the area of mathematics.
But that won't be a problem as the minutes stretch into hours and maybe
even days, as the proof is out there now.
The mathematics is simple enough with a complete solution to a
factorization given.
If mathematicians can't follow a simple proof, then how can they be
mathematicians?
But if they follow a simple proof, which could mean that security
systems can be broken into, and sit on their hands, like they did with
my earlier research, then my point that they don't care about proof
will be made, and people will also understand just how bad the
situation truly is.
And then they'll know that yes, some of you could have realized that I
found a short proof of Fermat's Last Theorem, and keep quiet about it,
to help hide the fact.
And yes, you could know that ideal theory was bogus, and still teach it
to vulnerable and trusting young minds because some of you are people
who don't give a damn.
That removes the political arguments you might use.
The clock is ticking...
James Harris
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: JSH: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: JSH: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- From: Gene Ward Smith
- Re: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- From: Abstract Dissonance
- Re: JSH: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- Prev by Date: Re: Cardinality of basis of continuous functions
- Next by Date: factorization an NP problem (don't see it)
- Previous by thread: Properly combining a Rotation and Translation matrix? (linear algebra)
- Next by thread: Re: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|