Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- From: "valery" <valery@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 5 Jul 2006 23:00:10 -0700
matt271829-news@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Anyway, FWIW, making some simplifying assumptions (that seem entirely1.76E-10 sounds just perfect! it passes reality check and is very well
reasonable since 71 is so much smaller than 2^32), I make the
probability of event E equal to about 1.76E-10. I think this is
slightly different from James Waldby's answer. I did it in a slightly
more elaborate way, but with these particular numbers I would have
thought the answers should differ by only an imperceptible amount. I'm
not sure at the moment why the answers differ as much as they do, but
if I get a following wind I might try to pick through it and figure it
out.
aligned with my experiment (taking your numbers gives us about 0.58
probability that event E occurs at least once per 2^32 attempts).
Could you post your formulas, please? (with some explanations if
possible ;-).
-Valery.
http://www.harper.no/valery
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- References:
- Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- From: valery
- Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- Prev by Date: Re: JSH: They wouldn't believe otherwise
- Next by Date: Re: What are the current advancements in Mathematics going on?
- Previous by thread: Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- Next by thread: Re: Please help me to find a mistake here
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|