Re: JSH: Kind of weird, eh?
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Jul 2006 16:00:19 -0700
a.khanm@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
I have had some experience with amateur mathematicians trying to
convince the world that there proofs/methods are correct. I have come
across many fallacious proofs of Fermat's last theorem and the four
colour theorem. The problem is that without proper mathematical
training people tend to look at things superficially and this leads to
incorrect proofs.
A profesional mathematician approaches things maturely and with a sense
of responsibility. This is clearly lacking in your manner. I don't
blaem you. I can understand how frustrating it can be for you to see
your proofs criticized and dismissed by mathematical community. But
truth is mostly bitter. It is better if you understand that nobody here
is your enemy and we all advise you for your own good.
Bottom line is the sooner you overcome your delusions the better for
you.
That was a nice little speech, which I'm sure many people have made
here already. Unfortunately, you are not dealing with a sane human
being here, primarily since he has been told this repeatedly, and your
effort was wasted. (He has a B.S. degree in Physics, which makes me
wonder why he isn't devoting his time to perpetual motion machines and
such things.)
My advice is to avoid contact with JSH, sit back, and enjoy the fun. I
wish I'd learned this lesson before going after Archimedes Plutonium's
proofs ...
--- Christopher Heckman
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
I find a couple of things strange about the simple factoring solution I
found:
*It is very simple.
*Apparently, no one discovered it before.
*And you people are still trying the keep quiet thing with it.
That still amazes me. Over three years ago I found a short proof of
Fermat's Last Theorem. It had taken me somewhere around six years to
figure out the mathematics, and nail down most of it, with somewhere
around four years of almost nothing.
So much work and effort on my part believing that given an answer some
people who cared about mathematics would step up, and no one did.
And I found THE prime counting function, which I call my prime counting
function, because you people fought that as well.
And you kept ideal theory even after I showed it didn't work.
With all of those accomplishments, you sat back as if you were safe
when I warned that I was going after the factoring problem because I
figured you couldn't get away with lying about it.
And it took me some years, but I am starting to think that hey, I may
have figured out the key equations for handling the damn thing.
How long will you people lie this time?
Your contempt for mathematics amazes me.
People who claim to be mathematicians who spit upon math proofs, ignore
wonderful results, and probably now are wondering how they can hide a
simple factoring idea.
Your contempt for mathematics is beyond belief.
You hate mathematics, clearly, by what you do. You despise
mathematical proof.
And you cannot be trusted.
But the world trusted you, when you claimed that factoring was a hard
problem because none of you had solved it, when you are people who hate
math!!!
Of course you couldn't find the answer--you people HATE mathematics.
You demonstrate that hatred by what you do, not by what you say.
After all, people can lie about anything.
James Harris
.
- References:
- JSH: Kind of weird, eh?
- From: jstevh
- Re: JSH: Kind of weird, eh?
- From: a.khanm@xxxxxxxxx
- JSH: Kind of weird, eh?
- Prev by Date: Re: What can be said about e
- Next by Date: Re: Pi Is Rational
- Previous by thread: Re: JSH: Kind of weird, eh?
- Next by thread: How to determine an equation from data
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
