Re: JSH: Way too interesting


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
So I have this neat result using congruences which is so easy and
trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens!

And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual
reaction.

I can check with other groups and see what happens, shifting how I
present the mathematics.

Far more interesting than I thought possible.

It's like a study of the world with the most powerful intellectual
microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem
versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot.


James Harris

If you really do have a simple solution, then produce the prime
factorizations of all the numbers here:

http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2093

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Way too interesting
    ... trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens! ... And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual ... You're labeled a crackpot largely in part to how you act. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting
    ... trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens! ... And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual ... versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot. ... I don't think anyone needs a microscope for that. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting
    ... trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens! ... And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual ... versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot. ... I don't think anyone needs a microscope for that. ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Way too interesting
    ... So I have this neat result using congruences which is so easy and ... trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens! ... microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem ... versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Small regulator adjustment?
    ... ticks, now that would be surprising, especially to the owner who ... after 35years I really don't think about it anymore, if something different comes up then that sparks a few grey cells, I did an St1686, yesterday, a friend picked it up at Vinnies for $7, in pretty good condition for a 60s watch, stripped it down, cleaned it, replaced the coverplate and sweep seconds wheel, found a NOS seconds hand to suit, new rubber gasket for the back, rated it to 5secs fast per day to compensate for positional errors, the whole thing took me less than 40mins to do, would have done it quicker but I waiting for something else to finish so this was a time filler. ... but I suppose to someone watching me they would wonder how I can do it, that I pulled the watch to pieces in five minutes, and placed the parts in the cleaning basket, thats a complete strip down, incabloc jewels out, endcap jewels in the plates, coverplate off to remove the dial train, etc, but having done thousands of movements similar over the years I really don't give it much thought. ...
    (alt.horology)