Re: JSH: Way too interesting


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
So I have this neat result using congruences which is so easy and
trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens!

And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual
reaction.

I can check with other groups and see what happens, shifting how I
present the mathematics.

Far more interesting than I thought possible.

It's like a study of the world with the most powerful intellectual
microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem
versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot.


James Harris

If you really do have a simple solution, then produce the prime
factorizations of all the numbers here:

http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2093

Why? Why should I bother?

Think carefully. I have a theory at this point. It looks good to me,
like interesting mathematics. I like it.

What good would come of me implementing it--assuming it works well?

Why should I bother?


James Harris

Because a real researcher likes to test his theories. If when tested
the theory is proven wrong, they then learn from their mistakes and
endeavor to do better.

I guess this is beyond your comprehension.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting
    ... And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual ... microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem ... Why should I bother? ... like interesting mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Way too interesting
    ... And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual ... microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem ... Why should I bother? ... like interesting mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Question of P=NP, Anatoly Plotnikov
    ... if you don't bother to check out simple things like that, why should anybody take you seriously when you claim RSA doesn't work and Galois theory is all just one big mistake??? ... And I don't say that Galois Theory is just one big mistake. ... I have presented equations solving the factoring problem, ... factors of your target gives you quintics. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Mystery increases
    ... solution to the factoring problem. ... I am not qualified to speak about most of your results, but the one I feel most qualified to speak on, your attempt to prove P = NP, I had a strong feeling from you: your proofs were based on "it feels right," as opposed to fully rigorous derivations. ... It appears to be mostly intuitions that you claim proved you correct; intuitions about your algorithms led me to suspect gaping holes. ... An outsider who claims to be able to refute 100-year old cornerstones of mathematics is more likely to be wrong than right. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Of course theyre lying
    ... The reason for me picking the factoring problem is that the lies ... Your group claims to care about mathematics, ... "Understanding Godel isn't about following his formal proof. ...
    (sci.math)