Re: JSH: Way too interesting


jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
Dann Corbit wrote:
<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152840253.740078.256450@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
mike4ty4@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
So I have this neat result using congruences which is so easy and
trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens!

And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual
reaction.

I can check with other groups and see what happens, shifting how I
present the mathematics.

Far more interesting than I thought possible.

It's like a study of the world with the most powerful intellectual
microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem
versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot.


James Harris

If you really do have a simple solution, then produce the prime
factorizations of all the numbers here:

http://www.rsasecurity.com/rsalabs/node.asp?id=2093

Why? Why should I bother?

The total sum of prizes for factorization of:
RSA-704 RSA-768 RSA-896 RSA-1024 RSA-1536 RSA-2048
is worth $605,000.00

Think carefully. I have a theory at this point. It looks good to me,
like interesting mathematics. I like it.

A scientific approach includes testing the theories:
http://teacher.pas.rochester.edu/phy_labs/AppendixE/AppendixE.html

What good would come of me implementing it--assuming it works well?

Oodles of moolah. You would actually become famous as something other than
a complete blithering idiot.


So your reason is to impress people.

Why should I bother?

To prove that you are not an incompetent nitwit troll who pops off with
absurd nonsense and then after 6 months of circular arguments admits he was
wrong and then pops off with a new bit of equally innane nonsense.


Yes, yours is a social world. I like the mathematics.

I read several replies to me here, and none of them were reasons for
me.

I like the theory. It has a simplicity and purity that appeals to me.

The mathematics is straightforward and beautiful.

What else is there?


James Harris

So, being correct doesn't matter to you. Well then, you are on the
right track.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Factoring and rationals
    ... What do you mean by "specialized choices"? ... The mathematics behind a real SF Theorem would guarantee it. ... > reason for a special choice. ... You made a claim earlier that mathematics doesn't care about factoring. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: Gist of surrogate factoring theorem
    ... while the surrogate factoring ... > a difference of squares with your target. ... mathematics requirement for physics majors is algebra, calculus, ... of people with this view of mathematics. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Nearly done
    ... > theory and method for factoring that I call surrogate factoring. ... > The mathematics though is surprisingly simple, ... but are in the field of rationals. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: JSH: Nearly done
    ... > theory and method for factoring that I call surrogate factoring. ... > The mathematics though is surprisingly simple, ... but are in the field of rationals. ...
    (sci.crypt)
  • Re: JSH: Factoring and residues
    ... I was wrong in thinking that picking x_res and getting k with a chosen ... It's math. ... gcds than the random-gcd factoring method was expected to take. ... using the tools of mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)