Re: "proportional"
- From: William Elliot <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 18:08:57 -0700
Reply only if adequate context is included _within_ the reply.
Otherwise all contexts are removed from my view,
the flow of thought disrupted and chaos reigns.
http://oakroadsystems.com/genl/unice.htm#quote
In particular for Google users:
Instead of simply hitting the prominent "Reply" link, which doesn't
include a copy of the post to which one is replying, click the "Show
Options" link (toward the top of an item in the thread), which causes
a shaded area of links to appear next to the top of the item, including
"Reply" (first) that does introduce a copy of the previous text (offset
by > signs in the usual fashion).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: "proportional"
- From: matt271829-news
- Re: "proportional"
- References:
- "proportional"
- From: G Patel
- Re: "proportional"
- From: mathman
- "proportional"
- Prev by Date: Re: Set Theory: Should you believe?
- Next by Date: Re: JSH: Factoring and residues
- Previous by thread: Re: "proportional"
- Next by thread: Re: "proportional"
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading