Re: Way too interesting


<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152837475.516807.66750@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Proginoskes wrote:
jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
David Moran wrote:
<jstevh@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1152753353.097756.71980@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
So I have this neat result using congruences which is so easy and
trivial that I can just put it out there and watch what happens!

And on this group, surprising even me, there is still the usual
reaction.

I can check with other groups and see what happens, shifting how I
present the mathematics.

Far more interesting than I thought possible.

It's like a study of the world with the most powerful intellectual
microscope ever built--a simple solution to the factoring problem
versus a social view that I'm just some crackpot.


James Harris


You're labeled a crackpot largely in part to how you act. Are you
that
stupid that you can't realize that?

Dave

But actions are irrelevant to mathematical proof.

And they would be, if you had ... Ah, skip it.

And besides, I have often noted that a lot of my postings are for
entertainment value, or are out of boredom, so it does not quite make
sense that the hostility that can be read repeatedly in replies to me,
like in your posting here, is just about my behavior.

Then why are you posting here, and not at some place like
alt.psychology?

There is something more, some kind of reaction formation?

The crucial difference now, which allows the possibility of answers, is
the simple factoring proof.

You have an equation which, when solved, solves the factoring problem.
Well, so do I. It is

(a + 2) (b + 2) = T,

where a and b are allowed to be nonnegative integers.

You have given no _algorithm_, no precise procedure, for factoring an
arbitrary integer. Any competant computer programmer knows this. OTOH,
maybe that's why you got fired from Alltel ...


What is this nonsense about me being fired from Alltel?

Where do you people get this stuff?


James Harris


you are full of *** JSH


.

Loading