Re: Finding large primes, quickly

James Harris said:

"Like this thread is supposed to be about an idea for quickly generating large primes, which is a simple idea. And readers should notice how it has degenerated and look to see who did it!!!"

Yes, let's do that. In the first post in this thread, you wrote...

***quote***

So what's wrong with this idea which might speed up how quickly your browser can connect by SSL? Well, I'm posting it for objective criticism, but I suspect instead I'll get a lot of namecalling and other juvenile behavior from people who will hate the idea--because I give it.

(So yes, this could be worth money if I cared at all about patenting it, like, millions of dollars U.S. because of the volume of usage of RSA systems.)

That's the real mathematical world. Of course, if it IS practical, then someone somewhere in some country should pick it up, and later I'll use this as yet another example of how real mathematicians behave today, when I say it's because math is a DIFFICULT SUBJECT, so there are more "mathematicians" than can be supported by real discoveries, so the bulk of them make things up!!!

So they have to come after people who don't, which is why they do it in such low ways, like calling names like "crank" or "crackpot" because they are cons trying to keep people from noticing how little they actually accomplish compared to what they claim to accomplish in mathematical areas.

***end of quote***

So, in a thread which is "supposed to be about an idea for quickly generating large primes", before anyone has had a chance to reply, you accused people on this group of "juvenile behaviour", claimed that they hate ideas because of where they come from, threatened to use this alleged behaviour against them, accused them of "mak(ing) things up", called them "cons" and accused them of "trying to keep people from noticing how little they actually accomplish".

So tell us, who exactly is to blame for the degeneration of this thread?
.