Re: finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Sun, 13 Aug 2006 20:08:37 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1155425061.608481.190840@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
jennifer <scrilla_12_1999@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thank you very much sir.
Please don't top-post.
Do note a mistake:
Arturo Magidin wrote:
If a, b, c, and d are all positive integers, then a/b < c/d if and
only if ad < bc. And if ad>bc, then a/b > c/d.
Here, a=11, b=45, c=12, d=50. ad=11*50 =550,
bc = 45*12 = 5*9*12 = 9*60 = 450.
9*60 = 540, not 450 (transposition typo). Luckily, it is still true
that:
Since ad is bigger than bc,
so the rest is still right.
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- References:
- finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- From: jennifer
- Re: finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- From: Arturo Magidin
- Re: finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- From: jennifer
- finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- Prev by Date: Re: Finding large primes, quickly
- Next by Date: Need help with computing volumes using the divergence (Gauss) theorem
- Previous by thread: Re: finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- Next by thread: Re: finding which fraction is bigger without a calculator
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|