Re: JSH: That's why insults are used

jstevh@xxxxxxx wrote:
It's harder and harder to see how mathematicians missed such simple
things about prime numbers.

Given the quickness with which math people turn to insults when
challenged, my take on it is that on some level they know what they are
doing.

But is is just so low, so depressing to think that people could do such
things, and then they come after anyone who is in the area who could
reveal the truth.

So yeah, as much as mathematicians may hate and fear my work on
non-polynomial factorization--enough for a math journal to just keel
over and die--they may be just as afraid of my prime counting function,
and the possibility of people nosing around and figuring out what is
going on.

So what is going on?

By not clearly separating the random system from the determined system
with primes, mathematicians can do "research" where they apply tools
that can't work to answer questions that are already answered--using
probability and statistics.

So, the twin primes conjecture is a probability question, as is
Goldbach's conjecture.

At this point, the pattern of postings used against me fit a pattern of
political behavior, as I've noted, but why do people resort to
political behavior?

It's when the truth doesn't fit their personal needs, so they try to
find ways around it, is when people turn to politics.

The insults used against me, the webpages, and all the hostile behavior
have been about keeping me from doing what I'm doing now--getting the
truth out.

By lying about primes and questions about primes, by NOT using the
simple explanations readily available, millions upon millions of
dollars in research and prizes could be had by people who did, nothing
of importance at all.

And people who might otherwise not be able to work as academics could
be professors and teach students, when their "research" was valueless
to the world.

I think this problem arose along with the idea of "pure math", probably
when the possibility of mathematics as a career arose.


James Harris

You've got it completely wrong. Insults are used because you use them first. I've yet to see one post from you without any social crap. Is that because you don't know what you're talking about and that social crap distracts from that fact? I think it is. If you really knew what you were doing, you'd cut the crap about the conspiracy theories. The stuff you're experiencing now is the same thing that would happen if I went to sci.physics and started ranting about how there was no such thing as gravity.

Dave
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Chez Watt: Prime Idiocy
    ... I can now understand why you haven't attempted any math in support of your ... There is a disclaimer that the lists are only ... listing of the first seven primes, then it is hardly irrelevant to point ... to mathematical skill. ...
    (talk.origins)
  • Re: JSH: Thats why insults are used
    ... non-polynomial factorization--enough for a math journal to just keel ... So, the twin primes conjecture is a probability question, as is ... political behavior, as I've noted, but why do people resort to ... The insults used against me, the webpages, and all the hostile behavior ...
    (sci.math)
  • JSH: Thats why insults are used
    ... It's harder and harder to see how mathematicians missed such simple ... non-polynomial factorization--enough for a math journal to just keel ... So, the twin primes conjecture is a probability question, as is ... The insults used against me, the webpages, and all the hostile behavior ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: More on my work with primes
    ... > errors in the discipline of math, as I also have research on primes ... > Here are some calculations of dSfrom calculating p, ... any of the mathematical literature. ...
    (sci.math)