Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: "MoeBlee" <jazzmobe@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 22 Aug 2006 11:00:25 -0700
Albrecht wrote:
There is no relevance in which system the axiom is found.
E.g. the Axiom A: "Axiom A is wrong", is self contradicting, regardless
of which other axioms are used, I think. The same holds for the axiom
of infinity.
You miss the point. Since you've not shown any contradiction in set
theory, whatever contradiction you claim to have found must be a
contradiction between set theory and something else outside of set
theory. But if you can't articulate that something else as a
mathematical formula, then no one much cares that set theory conflicts
with your not mathematically articulated principles.
So I take it from your response that you don't have a set of axioms for
your mathematics. So I wonder how you expect people to evaluate whether
something is or is not a theorem of your mathematics.
MoeBlee
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Albrecht
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Albrecht
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: Re: My Revolutionary New Prime Discriminator
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|