Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 23 Aug 2006 20:18:09 -0600
In article <ecijd7$7mn$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Tony Orlow <aeo6@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
MoeBlee wrote:
Albrecht wrote:
There is no relevance in which system the axiom is found.
E.g. the Axiom A: "Axiom A is wrong", is self contradicting, regardless
of which other axioms are used, I think. The same holds for the axiom
of infinity.
You miss the point. Since you've not shown any contradiction in set
theory, whatever contradiction you claim to have found must be a
contradiction between set theory and something else outside of set
theory. But if you can't articulate that something else as a
mathematical formula, then no one much cares that set theory conflicts
with your not mathematically articulated principles.
Hi MoeBlee - How are you?
Set theory contradicts with:
(1) E y e N, A x>y, x< 2*x < x^2 < 2^x (y=2)
That isn't even a well formed statement so it is not even false, but
merely meaningless.
.
- References:
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Franziska Neugebauer
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: mueckenh
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Albrecht
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Virgil
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Albrecht
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: MoeBlee
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- From: Tony Orlow
- Re: An uncountable countable set
- Prev by Date: ODE Problem
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by thread: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|