Re: A new definition for Cardinality




Virgil wrote:
In article <1156528540.632536.12620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"georgie" <geo_cant@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Virgil wrote:

An "If...then..." form of statement will be true unless the if clause is
true and the then clause is false.

If this statement is true, then this statement is false.

ALSO

If this statement is false, then this statement is true.

I think the two statements above contradict your statement.

You are wrong.

You are wrong because that is, in fact, what I think.

The definition in logic of "material implication", which
is usually represented in English be the If...then... construction, is
precisely that such an if...then... compound statement is true unless
the if clause is true while the then clause is false.

So is the first statement true and therefore false or is it false and
therefore true? I'm just curious how your logic works because my
logic seems a bit more logical than yours. Not to worry though,
because I understand that your less logical logic is the "true"
logic. I'm just trying to figure it out, just as the OP is.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: A new definition for Cardinality
    ... true and the then clause is false. ... prove the truth value of a statement than the original statement ... If "Virgil" does not get it, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Hacme Bank
    ... aggregate function and there is no GROUP BY clause. ... IF YOU WORRY YOU MAKE IT DOUBLE, ... Ethical Hacking at the InfoSec Institute. ...
    (Pen-Test)
  • Help my correct the grammar
    ... "A place where you do everything but no one complains of anything". ... In the clause "I usually use computer all day", I want to say that I ... I don't know the phrase "worry at finances" was clarified. ...
    (alt.usage.english)
  • Re: UPDATE syntax question
    ... Specifically in an EXISTS clause, the optimizer will just test for the ... existence of any rows, and not worry about what columns were specified. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.programming)
  • Re: dynamic XML using for XML explicit
    ... If you only have those three possibilities to worry about, consider using a T-SQL case based on the parameter value, then using having a clause that executes the correct FOR XML EXPLICIT query as part of that. ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.xml)