Re: Am I a crank?
- From: "Nathan" <ntspam2@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Aug 2006 20:31:25 -0700
david petry wrote:
It could be argued that since the mathematics community does expend a
great deal of energy in the search for formal proofs of conjectures
having ridiculously high probabilities of being true, and often turns a
blind eye to the probabilistic arguments, the mathematics community
itself engages in crank-like behavior.
I have read many heuristic arguments advanced by mathematicians to
suggest what *might* be true, especially in number theory. I disagree
that the community "often turns a blind eye" to such. It's just that
these still leave the actual question unanswered.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: david petry
- Re: Am I a crank?
- References:
- Am I a crank?
- From: skialps10@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: david petry
- Am I a crank?
- Prev by Date: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by Date: Re: Am I a crank?
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Index(es):