Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: "Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 13:32:59 -0700
fred botjon wrote:
"Randy Poe" <poespam-trap@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1156880936.178409.317800@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Obviously not. The equation x + y + z = w means that
x is at most w/3.
wrong.
An even simpler counterargument. Given x<y<z and x+y+z = w.
Since y>x, z>z, then x+y+z > x + x + x = 3x. So w > 3x. x is
at most w/3. This is true even if you don't restrict to natural
numbers.
The equation xyz = a means x is at most
cuberoot(a).
wrong.
x<y<z so xyz > x*x*x, i.e. a > x^3. Therefore x < cuberoot(a).
Again, this is true even without the restriction to natural numbers.
So there are finitely many possible values for x,
and similarly for y and z.
wrong.
This is of course true only when you add the restriction to natural
numbers, which OP did.
- Randy
.
- References:
- Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: payam
- Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: fred botjon
- Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: payam
- Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: Randy Poe
- Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- From: fred botjon
- Solving a 3D systems of equations
- Prev by Date: Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- Next by Date: N-Dimensional Rotation
- Previous by thread: Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- Next by thread: Re: Solving a 3D systems of equations
- Index(es):