Simple Question: Totally Boundedness of [0,1] intersect R-Q
- From: "Jason Pawloski" <jpawloski@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 29 Aug 2006 20:31:14 -0700
I read in that Dover "Counterexamples in Topology" (great book btw)
that the irrational numbers between 0 and 1 are not a compact space.
Now it says, and I already knew, that totally bounded and complete
implies compact.
It says that the irrational numbers between 0 and 1 are complete. I
haven't worked it but I believe it. So that means that it is not
totally bounded. If I recall my definitions correct, for any e>0, [0,1]
intersect R-Q can be covered by finitely many epsilon-balls. This is
what I don't understand. I can't possibly see how this isn't totally
bounded. Isn't (0,1) totally bounded??
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple Question: Totally Boundedness of [0,1] intersect R-Q
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Simple Question: Totally Boundedness of [0,1] intersect R-Q
- From: The World Wide Wade
- Re: Simple Question: Totally Boundedness of [0,1] intersect R-Q
- Prev by Date: Math as an Experimental Science
- Next by Date: Re: compact support
- Previous by thread: Math as an Experimental Science
- Next by thread: Re: Simple Question: Totally Boundedness of [0,1] intersect R-Q
- Index(es):