Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 30 Aug 2006 01:53:36 -0700
Han de Bruijn wrote:
William Elliot wrote:
Riddle of the Day. If the statement of a computer discovered and proven
theorem, is so long and complex that nobody can read it, (ie, is
incomprehensible), is it meaningful and useful (does it really exist)?
Huh, huh. Riddle of the Day. How about Wiles' Court Room Style Proof of
Fermat's Last Theorem? And other such modern "proofs" ...
Including the Four Color Theorem proofs.
Related riddle: Should proofs be limited in length to what a single
human being can comprehend?
(If so, there are only a finite number of provable theorems. And if so,
which specific human being should be used?)
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: Chris Thompson
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- References:
- Math as an Experimental Science
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: Gerry Myerson
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: William Elliot
- Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Math as an Experimental Science
- Prev by Date: Re: To Compute ( a ^ b ) mod n
- Next by Date: Re: Am I a crank?
- Previous by thread: Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- Next by thread: Re: Math as an Experimental Science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|