Re: Am I a crank?


Han de Bruijn wrote:
schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

Then there is no experiementation. Mathematics is not an experimental
science, it is not even a science. The principle of falsifiability does
not apply.

Any even number > 2 is the sum of two prime numbers. Now suppose that I
find just _one_ huge number for which this (well-known) conjecture does
_not_ hold. By mere number crunching. Isn't that an application of the
"principle of falsifiability" to mathematics?

Falsifiability does not _need_ to apply in mathematics. In math,
statements can be true without their being a proof of it being true.
Likewise, they can be false.

In physics, a hypothesis is never true only verified xor false.

Han de Bruijn

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Am I a crank?
    ... science, it is not even a science. ... The principle of falsifiability does ... find just _one_ huge number for which this conjecture does ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Falsification OR The Argument From Authority
    ... _in principle_ be falsifiable? ... too concerned with falsifiability itself, accepting it as one of the ... science has *never* operated in any way that is ... professional career advancement actually contribute something, ...
    (sci.bio.evolution)
  • Re: Am I a crank?
    ... science, it is not even a science. ... The principle of falsifiability does ... Except that Virgil maintains that definitions in modern math are ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Am I a crank?
    ... science, it is not even a science. ... The principle of falsifiability does ... It is merely impossible to fulfill. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Am I a crank?
    ... science, it is not even a science. ... The principle of falsifiability does ... Falsifiability does not _need_ to apply in mathematics. ...
    (sci.math)
Loading