Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 10:55:52 -0700
On 30 Aug 2006 02:43:00 -0700, schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Proginoskes wrote:
schoenfeld.one@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
Han de Bruijn wrote:
[...]
Or is it just mathematics? In the latter case, computing a large prime
is also mathematics, because it could be done - in principle - by hand.
(What else does computer science add except more speed and more space.)
Then there is no experiementation. Mathematics is not an experimental
science, it is not even a science. The principle of falsifiability does
not apply.
Written by someone who has not done any math research.
One of many examples: Try dividing 2^n by n and keeping track of the
remainders. You won't get 1; you get 2 a lot, but you never seem to get
a 3. So you conjecture:
CONJECTURE: The remainder of 2^n divided by n is never 3.
However, this conjecture is false; in particular, the remainder of 2^n
divided by n is 3 if n = 4,700,063,497 (but for no smaller n's).
Hello Crackpot.
Crackpot=disagreer. Quite mathematical.
~v~~
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- References:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Jeremy Boden
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: John Schutkeker
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Jesse F. Hughes
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: schoenfeld . one
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Han de Bruijn
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: schoenfeld . one
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Proginoskes
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: schoenfeld . one
- Re: Am I a crank?
- Prev by Date: Re: sin (n degree) = rational number ?
- Next by Date: Re: A complex variables problem
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|