sci.math

• Date Index

---

• phrasal search, nicolas_laurent545
• Matrices, Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues, jonathan . ethier
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Matrices, Eigenvectors and Eigenvalues, jonathan . ethier
• Generating a free group, barr
  • Re: Generating a free group, Lee Rudolph
• utility for viewing graphs, gmock
• JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH => YOU ARE A "MATH MORON", MIT
  • Re: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH => YOU ARE A "MATH MORON", James
• Cardinality: a definition, zuhair
  • Re: Cardinality: a definition, A N Niel
  • Re: Cardinality: a definition, Virgil
• Matrix Multiplication, Billy Smith
  • Re: Matrix Multiplication, Michael Orion
• Banach/Analysis Question, Jason Pawloski
  • Re: Banach/Analysis Question, José Carlos Santos
• Recommendation of style guide for math thesis, Diana
• Banach/Analysis Proof, Jason Pawloski
  • Re: Banach/Analysis Proof, Robert Israel
• Function for the humber of "holes" created when joining vertices of equilateral 2D shapes, jomama
• About Linear Algebra, jack1234
  • Re: About Linear Algebra, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: About Linear Algebra, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: About Linear Algebra, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: About Linear Algebra, Herman Rubin
• seri, lucifer
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • seri, lucifer
  • seri, lucifer
• Re: Probability of a 1 degree arc, Duncan Muirhead
• intersection of conjugate subgroups, Anton Adams
  • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, rusty
    • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, Anton Adams
      • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, rusty
      • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, James Dolan
      • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, Anton Adams
  • Re: intersection of conjugate subgroups, Marc Olschok
• Idea for radio triangulation, Ceriel Nosforit
  • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, Jeroen
    • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, Ceriel Nosforit
  • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, Frieta
  • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, Ceriel Nosforit
  • Re: Idea for radio triangulation, Randy Poe
• I search for a new function!!! Urgent Read Please!!!, Doge1789
  • Re: I search for a new function!!! Urgent Read Please!!!, Randy Poe
  • Re: I search for a new function!!! Urgent Read Please!!!, Daniel Jackson
• Can anyone provide some clues on how to prove a conjecture?, hooklee
  • Re: Can anyone provide some clues on how to prove a conjecture?, M.J.T. Guy
• what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, Michael
  • Re: what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, William Elliot
  • Re: what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, Ioannis
  • Re: what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, Narasimham
  • Re: what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, A N Niel
  • Re: what's the converse(negation) of this statement?, Jules
• Probable Prime Number, bassam king karzeddin
  • Re: Probable Prime Number, Jeroen
    • Re: Probable Prime Number, bassam king karzeddin
      • Re: Probable Prime Number, Jeroen
      • Re: Probable Prime Number, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Probable Prime Number, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: Probable Prime Number, M.J.T. Guy
• Kids and Math, see me
  • Re: Kids and Math, David Moran
  • Re: Kids and Math, A N Niel
• Cantor Confusion, the_wign
  • Re: Cantor Confusion, cbrown
    • Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Cantor Confusion, Peter Webb
    • Re: Cantor Confusion, mueckenh
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Ross A. Finlayson
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Randy Poe
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, William Hughes
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, guenther vonKnakspot
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Cantor Confusion, Virgil
  • Re: Cantor Confusion, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Cantor Confusion, jmorriss@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Cantor Confusion, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Cantor Confusion, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Cantor Confusion, david petry
• combinations (choosing objects from "same set".. product rule), G Patel
  • Re: combinations (choosing objects from "same set".. product rule), Proginoskes
    • Re: combinations (choosing objects from "same set".. product rule), G Patel
    • Re: combinations (choosing objects from "same set".. product rule), G Patel
    • Re: combinations (choosing objects from "same set".. product rule), G Patel
• Number theory question, Rotwang
  • Re: Number theory question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Number theory question, Rotwang
  • Re: Number theory question, Tonico
    • Re: Number theory question, Rotwang
      • Re: Number theory question, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Number theory question, barr
• "New Proposed Theory To Remove National Debt Totally..." ( Smart1234), Smart1234
  • Re: "New Proposed Theory To Remove National Debt Totally..." ( Smart1234), porky_pig_jr@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: "New Proposed Theory To Remove National Debt Totally..." ( Smart1234), Han de Bruijn
• Photos Of DEAD Celebrities...crimie scenes on some, arexar@xxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Photos Of DEAD Celebrities...crimie scenes on some, arexar@xxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Tough Questions (jokes), wheierman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Tough Questions (jokes), Proginoskes
    • Re: Tough Questions (jokes), Gerry Myerson
• groups that are not isomorphic, mary
  • Re: groups that are not isomorphic, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: groups that are not isomorphic, The World Wide Wade
• Random Sudoku Creator and Step by Step Solver, Sri
• math tutor handbook, Janzia
• Re: How not to teach mathematics, Herman Rubin
  • Re: How not to teach mathematics, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How not to teach mathematics, Herman Rubin
  • Re: How not to teach mathematics, Herman Rubin
    • Re: How not to teach mathematics, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: How not to teach mathematics, Herman Rubin
• question about the 'loves' algorithm, Jeroen
  • Re: question about the 'loves' algorithm, The Qurqirish Dragon
    • Re: question about the 'loves' algorithm, Jeroen
      • Re: question about the 'loves' algorithm, Robert Israel
• nullspaces, boo
  • Re: nullspaces, Paul Sperry
• regd Minimum Description Length of Eigenvalues of Square symmetric matrix, Ch. AswaniKumar
  • Re: regd Minimum Description Length of Eigenvalues of Square symmetric matrix, Robert Israel
• Help needed on a problem, sauzan
  • Re: Help needed on a problem, Valeriu Anisiu
    • Re: Help needed on a problem, Duncan Muirhead
  • Re: Help needed on a problem, Valeriu Anisiu
    • Re: Help needed on a problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help needed on a problem, Valeriu Anisiu
      • Re: Help needed on a problem, Robert Israel
      • Re: Help needed on a problem, Gerry Myerson
• Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, WhytheQ
  • Re: Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, postmortes
  • Re: Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, Janzon
    • Re: Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, WhytheQ
      • Re: Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, gjedwards
      • Re: Probability of a "Super" Royal Flush, postmortes
• general question concerning summation of divergent series, Gottfried Helms
• Approximation by Operators, Guntius . GIBLI
  • Re: Approximation by Operators, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: Approximation by Operators, A N Niel
      • Re: Approximation by Operators, David C . Ullrich
• differential of matrix functions, msustik
  • Re: differential of matrix functions, rusty
    • Re: differential of matrix functions, Robert Israel
      • Re: differential of matrix functions, rusty
  • Re: differential of matrix functions, Herman Rubin
    • Re: differential of matrix functions, ~Glynne
• What did I do wrong? Please explain, Mike S.
  • Re: What did I do wrong? Please explain, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: What did I do wrong? Please explain, Mike S.
      • Re: What did I do wrong? Please explain, Michael Jørgensen
      • Re: What did I do wrong? Please explain, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Number theory problem, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Number theory problem, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Number theory problem, Tim Peters
    • Re: Number theory problem, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
• groups and subgroups, dince24
  • Re: groups and subgroups, Jules
  • Re: groups and subgroups, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: groups and subgroups, Michael Press
• JSH: Stop being dense, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Panties On Head
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Gib Bogle
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Panties On Head
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Frieta
  • Re: Stop being dense, Frieta
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Rotwang
    • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Dr James
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Tim Peters
    • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, willo_thewisp
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, willo_thewisp
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, willo_thewisp
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Tim Peters
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, William Hughes
      • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, marcus_b
    • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, willo_thewisp
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, marcus_b
  • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: Stop being dense, Frieta
• Irrational Numbers, Cezanne123
  • Re: Irrational Numbers, Daniel Mayost
  • Re: Irrational Numbers, Dave L. Renfro
• stupid ODE question, Earl
  • Re: stupid ODE question, Gerry Myerson
• topology with closed and compact., mina_world
  • Re: topology with closed and compact., W. Dale Hall
    • Re: topology with closed and compact., W. Dale Hall
    • Re: topology with closed and compact., mina_world
      • Re: topology with closed and compact., W. Dale Hall
• ? LS and TLS expressions, Cheng Cosine
• Connected Manifolds, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Connected Manifolds, mjavaheri
    • Re: Connected Manifolds, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Connected Manifolds, barr
  • Re: Connected Manifolds, Lee Rudolph
• Calendar, zuhair
  • Re: Calendar, David R Tribble
    • Re: Calendar, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Calendar, gwh
    • Re: Calendar, Proginoskes
    • Re: Calendar, Proginoskes
  • Re: Calendar, David W . Cantrell
• Jr. High trig, duh
  • Re: Jr. High trig, mathman
  • Re: Jr. High trig, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Jr. High trig, Michael Harrington
    • Re: Jr. High trig, duh
      • Re: Jr. High trig, duh
• solving solid angle of cone (intuitively)?, perltcl@xxxxxxxxx
• JSH: JSHISM DEFINED, Dr. Chumly
  • Re: JSHISM DEFINED, mo time
• TAOCP prerequisite, Leo
  • Re: TAOCP prerequisite, Tim Peters
    • Re: TAOCP prerequisite, Leo
      • Re: TAOCP prerequisite, Michael Press
      • Re: TAOCP prerequisite, Tim Peters
• JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Noland
  • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, David Moran
    • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Jon Slaughter
      • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, mo time
  • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Randy Poe
    • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Ioannis
    • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Zebra
      • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, mo time
  • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, W. Dale Hall
    • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Dr. Chumly
      • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, David Moran
      • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Rotwang
    • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Frieta
      • Re: JSH: POST HERE NO MORE, Rotwang
• Need solution for a negative slope, VCUE
• binary operation over functions, theronruiz
  • Re: binary operation over functions, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: binary operation over functions, Robert Israel
• continuity of maximal function, Fedor
  • Re: continuity of maximal function, David C. Ullrich
  • Re: continuity of maximal function, Robert Israel
    • Re: continuity of maximal function, David C . Ullrich
• NMR experiment factors numbers with Gauss sums, gautam.kalia18@xxxxxxxxx
• Generic algorithms for looseless compression, chillax
• Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, iwan2no
  • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, iwan2no
  • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro
    • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, iwan2no
      • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, iwan2no
      • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, Randy Poe
      • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, iwan2no
  • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: Possible to find maximum value of a jagged function by differentiating?, Ioannis
• About a paper, Mark
  • Re: About a paper, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• Real Analysis, lija gunaseelan
  • Re: Real Analysis, The Last Danish Pastry
• Minimum cost integer flow problem, cuitao42@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Minimum cost integer flow problem, Robert Israel
    • Re: Minimum cost integer flow problem, cuitao42@xxxxxxxxx
• convexity, standshik
  • Re: convexity, rusty
• general formula for determinant of this matrix, TTroy
  • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, TTroy
  • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, rusty
    • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, TTroy
      • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, Daniel Mayost
      • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, rusty
      • Re: general formula for determinant of this matrix, rusty
• intro to topology question, math student
  • Re: intro to topology question, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: intro to topology question, William Elliot
• division of n!, surely asked before, imutate
  • Re: division of n!, surely asked before, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: division of n!, surely asked before, imutate
      • Re: division of n!, surely asked before, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: division of n!, surely asked before, imutate
    • Re: division of n!, surely asked before, Pubkeybreaker
• quantum finance book, Gregory C. Jones
  • Re: quantum finance book, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
• Measure, jennifer
  • Re: Measure, Daniel Mayost
• hermitian matrix, mary
  • Re: hermitian matrix, Daniel Mayost
• Need help with a formula, danny
  • Re: Need help with a formula, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Need help with a formula, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Need help with a formula, M Rath
    • Re: Need help with a formula, M Rath
      • Re: Need help with a formula, M Rath
      • Re: Need help with a formula, M Rath
• f^n (x), tgbopa
  • Re: f^n (x), tgbopa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • f^n (x), tgbopa
    • Re: f^n (x), Arturo Magidin
• piecewise polynomial interpolation problem, smart0072000in
• Question about transcendental p-adic numbers., lataianu bogdan
  • Re: Question about transcendental p-adic numbers., Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Question about transcendental p-adic numbers., Gerry Myerson
• estimate the cdf 95% with a confidence interval of a 95%, Dani Camps
  • Re: estimate the cdf 95% with a confidence interval of a 95%, Daniel Mayost
    • Re: estimate the cdf 95% with a confidence interval of a 95%, Dani Camps
      • Re: estimate the cdf 95% with a confidence interval of a 95%, Daniel Mayost
      • Re: estimate the cdf 95% with a confidence interval of a 95%, Dani Camps
• Proof needed for simple problem, lindabirkeng
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Virgil
    • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, lindabirkeng
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, mathman
    • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, lindabirkeng
      • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Bob Kolker
    • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, gtsavdar
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, gtsavdar
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Proof needed for simple problem, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Re: Horizontal Tangent Lines on Lemniscate, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: Horizontal Tangent Lines on Lemniscate, tgbopa
• unique finite subfield, Peter
  • Re: unique finite subfield, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: unique finite subfield, Pubkeybreaker
  • Re: unique finite subfield, Pubkeybreaker
• An oversight of Walter Rudin?, johnson
  • Re: An oversight of Walter Rudin?, David C . Ullrich
    • Re: An oversight of Walter Rudin?, johnson
      • Re: An oversight of Walter Rudin?, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: An oversight of Walter Rudin?, The World Wide Wade
• Just another indirect proof, hagen
  • Re: Just another indirect proof, hagen
  • Re: Just another indirect proof, hagen
  • Re: Just another indirect proof, hagen
• A real analysis question, johnson
  • Re: A real analysis question, A N Niel
  • Re: A real analysis question, The World Wide Wade
  • Re: A real analysis question, Gerry Myerson
• Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, James
  • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
    • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, Achava Nakhash, the Loving Snake
  • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, M.J.T. Guy
    • Message not available
      • Re: Units of Z[ sqrt{a}, sqrt{-b} ], number theory, M.J.T. Guy
• convex sets mesurable, Fedor
  • Re: convex sets mesurable, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: convex sets mesurable, Herman Rubin
  • Re: convex sets mesurable, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: convex sets mesurable, jestingrabbit
      • Re: convex sets mesurable, G. A. Edgar
      • Re: convex sets mesurable, jestingrabbit
  • Re: convex sets mesurable, Robert Israel
    • Re: convex sets mesurable, Fedor
      • Re: convex sets mesurable, Robert Israel
      • Re: convex sets mesurable, Fedor
• x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, Thomas Glanzmann
  • Re: x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, William Elliot
  • Re: x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, Chip Eastham
  • Re: x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, Thomas Glanzmann
    • Re: x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, Chip Eastham
      • Re: x^17^707 (mod 2003) != x, Thomas Glanzmann
• Circular units, v4vijayakumar
  • Re: Circular units, William Elliot
  • Re: Circular units, The Last Danish Pastry
    • Re: Circular units, v4vijayakumar
      • Re: Circular units, William Elliot
      • Re: Circular units, The Last Danish Pastry
      • Re: Circular units, v4vijayakumar
      • Re: Circular units, James Waldby
      • Re: Circular units, The Last Danish Pastry
• Geometry Problem.. Triangles and curves..., usenet
  • Re: Geometry Problem.. Triangles and curves..., G.E. Ivey
• Level Sets, Maury Barbato
  • Re: Level Sets, The World Wide Wade
    • Re: Level Sets, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Level Sets, Jannick Asmus
      • Re: Level Sets, Maury Barbato
      • Re: Level Sets, Jannick Asmus
• New mathematics/physical sciences positions at http://jobs.phds.org, September 25, 2006, PhDs . org Webmaster
• Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Eric Fennessey
  • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
      • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Duncan Muirhead
      • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Aluminium Holocene Holodeck Zoroaster
  • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Robert Israel
  • Re: Loxodrome/rhumb line Question, Narasimham
• Recursive Sum Set, Hauke Reddmann
  • Re: Recursive Sum Set, Proginoskes
    • Re: Recursive Sum Set, Proginoskes
      • Re: Recursive Sum Set, Proginoskes
      • Re: Recursive Sum Set, Hauke Reddmann
      • Re: Recursive Sum Set, Proginoskes
• An Integral problem., shna
  • Re: An Integral problem., shna
• polynom and bezier curve, Johann Larve
  • Re: polynom and bezier curve, David C . Ullrich
• " g(x1,g(x2,g(x3,y))) order invariant on xi ", alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
• When Was Sunrise, Phill
  • Re: When Was Sunrise, Michael Press
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • When Was Sunrise, Phill
    • Re: When Was Sunrise, Robert Israel
      • Re: When Was Sunrise, Phill
    • Re: When Was Sunrise, p . d . tafti
      • Re: When Was Sunrise, Richard Henry
• JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Noland
  • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Tonico
  • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Proginoskes
    • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, mo time
      • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Panties On Head
      • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Lord Protector
  • Re: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, ynaught
  • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, fishfry
    • Re: JSH: GET OUT OF SCI.MATH NOW, Proginoskes
• please give any idea on derivatives, Advait Vaidya
  • Re: please give any idea on derivatives, amzoti
• Metric space of metrics (Dave Renfro), William Elliot
  • Re: Metric space of metrics (Dave Renfro), Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Metric space of metrics (Dave Renfro), William Elliot
• verification of solution to integral, carlos5100
  • Re: verification of solution to integral, carlos5100
  • Re: verification of solution to integral, Virgil
    • Re: verification of solution to integral, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: verification of solution to integral, A N Niel
  • Re: verification of solution to integral, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Yet another question about sylow subgroups., rsvirk
  • Re: Yet another question about sylow subgroups., rusty
  • Re: Yet another question about sylow subgroups.,
    • Re: Yet another question about sylow subgroups., rusty
• How to prove R^n is the only noemty subset of itself that is both open and closed, fei . w . steven
  • Re: How to prove R^n is the only noemty subset of itself that is both open and closed, The World Wide Wade
  • Use the fact that R^n is connected, William Elliot
• EXPONENTS, russiandon
  • Re: EXPONENTS, Rick Decker
    • Re: EXPONENTS, Proginoskes
  • Re: EXPONENTS, Pubkeybreaker
• Interesting propery of prime divisors, yuri72
  • Re: Interesting propery of prime divisors, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Interesting property of prime divisors, yuri72
• Help with partial derivatives and implicit differentiation, end3r7
  • Re: Help with partial derivatives and implicit differentiation, end3r7
• probability: how to call this distribution?, Irek
  • Re: probability: how to call this distribution?, mathman
    • Re: probability: how to call this distribution?, Herman Rubin
• strict to nonstrict inequalities, vsgdp
  • Re: strict to nonstrict inequalities, Igor
  • Re: strict to nonstrict inequalities, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: strict to nonstrict inequalities, vsgdp
      • Re: strict to nonstrict inequalities, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: strict to nonstrict inequalities, William Elliot
• sum notation,, vsgdp
  • Re: sum notation,, Arturo Magidin
• Solution of a tricky equation, vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Solution of a tricky equation, vikraman.choudhury@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Solution of a tricky equation, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: Solution of a tricky equation, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro
    • Re: Solution of a tricky equation, Narasimham
    • Re: Solution of a tricky equation, David W . Cantrell
    • Re: Solution of a tricky equation, Robert Israel
• On the multiplication of quaternions, Pete Wisconsin
  • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Lee Rudolph
    • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Pete Wisconsin
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Ioannis
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Oscar Lanzi III
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Pete Wisconsin
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Pete Wisconsin
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Prai Jei
    • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Pete Wisconsin
  • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Igor
    • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: On the multiplication of quaternions, Igor
• algebra with algebraic and F(a)=F(a^3)., mina_world
  • Re: algebra with algebraic and F(a)=F(a^3)., Jannick Asmus
  • Re: algebra with algebraic and F(a)=F(a^3)., Arturo Magidin
    • Re: algebra with algebraic and F(a)=F(a^3)., mina_world
• JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
  • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, David Moran
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, David Moran
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, David Moran
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jstevh
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Lord Protector
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jshsucks
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Noland
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Proginoskes
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, David Moran
    • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, rusty
    • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, William Hughes
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Noland
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Proginoskes
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, mm
      • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, mm
  • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jshsucks
  • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, jankrihau
    • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Gib Bogle
  • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, David Moran
  • Re: JSH: Actually, easy answer anyway, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Actually, easy answer anyway, Noland
    • Re: Actually, easy answer anyway, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Actually, easy answer anyway, Gene Ward Smith
• An error in Stirling approximation?, TCL
  • Re: An error in Stirling approximation?, TCL
    • Re: An error in Stirling approximation?, TCL
      • Re: An error in Stirling approximation?, David W . Cantrell
  • Re: An error in Stirling approximation?, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: An error in Stirling approximation?, Denis Feldmann
• Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, virtualadepts
  • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, Prai Jei
  • Re: Final Theory Of Everything V6.0, Ioannis
• Universal Anarchy Theory, virtualadepts
• Re: Ancient Remainder Arithmetic, Milo Gardner
• A Collection of Metrics, William Elliot
  • Re: A Collection of Metrics, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: A Collection of Metrics, William Elliot
    • Re: A Collection of Metrics, Dave L. Renfro
• bricks for construction, stdntxy
  • Re: bricks for construction, William Elliot
  • Re: bricks for construction, Danny
    • Re: bricks for construction, stdntxy
      • Re: bricks for construction, William Elliot
  • Re: bricks for construction, Danny
    • Re: bricks for construction, stdntxy
      • Re: bricks for construction, William Elliot
      • Re: bricks for construction, areejan2000
      • Re: bricks for construction, William Elliot
      • Re: bricks for construction, stdntxy
  • Re: bricks for construction, Danny
• irreducible, Peter
  • Re: irreducible, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: irreducible,
  • Re: irreducible, Jannick Asmus
  • Re: irreducible, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro
• MATH, mishafiullah
  • Re: MATH, johnson
  • Re: MATH, Proginoskes
• Sum of Squares 0-1 Programming, Micheal Ehlers
  • Re: Sum of Squares 0-1 Programming, David M Einstein
• Discovering a prime number., manicalmongoose
  • Re: Discovering a prime number., Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Discovering a prime number., Wlodzimierz Holsztynski (wlod)
    • Re: Discovering a prime number., manicalmongoose
      • Re: Discovering a prime number., Proginoskes
      • Re: Discovering a prime number., manicalmongoose
      • Re: Discovering a prime number., Phil Carmody
  • Re: Discovering a prime number., John Bailey
• Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, John Schutkeker
  • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, David C . Ullrich
  • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, John Schutkeker
      • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, John Schutkeker
      • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Inhomogeneous First Order ODE's, Robert Israel
• Thanks in advance, Shama
  • Re: Thanks in advance, Tonico
• For all those interested in James Harris, Tonico
  • Re: For all those interested in James Harris,
    • Re: For all those interested in James Harris, Tonico
  • Re: For all those interested in James Harris, fishfry
    • Re: For all those interested in James Harris, Tonico
• Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, Gauster
  • Re: are maths invented or discovered?, Noland
    • Re: are maths invented or discovered?, Gauster
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, Gene Ward Smith
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, G. A. Edgar
    • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, mm
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, James Dolan
  • Re: are maths invented or discovered?, M Rath
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, vaultdweller
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, Timothy Golden BandTechnology.com
  • Re: Poll: are maths invented or discovered?, Han . deBruijn
• weak topology and metrizability, lones@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: weak topology and metrizability, G. A. Edgar
• Difference of two measures, sine_nomine
• e is irrational,, vsgdp
  • Re: e is irrational,, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• common divisor d = ax+by, vsgdp
  • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, vsgdp
      • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, Michael Press
    • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: common divisor d = ax+by, Michael Press
• Help with an Algebra Problem, Shawn
  • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, FreeToChoose
    • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, Shawn
      • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, Barry Schwarz
  • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, ynaught
  • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, Michael Stemper
    • Re: Help with an Algebra Problem, Shawn
• Re: Tetration, Andrew Robbins
  • Re: Tetration, Prai Jei
    • Re: Tetration, Ioannis
      • Re: Tetration, Prai Jei
• Arab transmission of Greek maths, Tim Walters
  • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
    • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, vsgdp
    • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, Ioannis
      • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, Dave Seaman
      • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, mensanator@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, Dave Seaman
  • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, David Park
    • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: Arab transmission of Greek maths, David Bernier
• Re: Geisler's Tetration Site Down?, Andrew Robbins
• Is this a known curve?, humberto . bortolossi
  • Re: Is this a known curve?, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: Is this a known curve?, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Is this a known curve?, humberto . bortolossi
      • Re: Is this a known curve?, humberto . bortolossi
      • Re: Is this a known curve?, Gene Ward Smith
• Linear Algebra question: newbie, anja.ende@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Linear Algebra question: newbie, Lee Rudolph
• minimal prime ideals in local noetherian rings, henrik
  • Re: minimal prime ideals in local noetherian rings, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: minimal prime ideals in local noetherian rings, henrik
      • Re: minimal prime ideals in local noetherian rings, Jannick Asmus
• The field f(script(A)) generated by a class script(A), NiceProbabilist
• a cow tied to a silo, Phill
  • Re: a cow tied to a silo, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: a cow tied to a silo, Badger
    • Re: a cow tied to a silo, Badger
      • Re: a cow tied to a silo, Gib Bogle
  • Re: a cow tied to a silo, Phil Carmody
• please help me to evaluate homework help website, dlouhane
  • Re: please help me to evaluate homework help website, William Elliot
• Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Proginoskes
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Keith A. Lewis
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Tim Peters
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, fishfry
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, The Ghost In The Machine
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Bob Kolker
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Bob Kolker
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Gib Bogle
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Virgil
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, N. Silver
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Virgil
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Virgil
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Virgil
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Virgil
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Marshall
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Gene Ward Smith
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Marshall
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Tonico
      • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, skuesey
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Rod Reynolds
    • Re: Pythagorean Theorem is Wrong, Bob Kolker
• Final Theory Of Everything V5.0, CoreyWhite
• Real Numbers, Cezanne123
  • Re: Real Numbers, smn
    • Re: Real Numbers, fernando revilla
      • Re: Real Numbers, smn
      • Re: Real Numbers, Proginoskes
  • Re: Real Numbers, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Real Numbers, Bob Kolker
• Set Theory, Cezanne123
  • Re: Set Theory, Bart Goddard
    • Re: Set Theory, smn
      • Re: Set Theory, Bart Goddard
      • Re: Set Theory, Proginoskes
  • Re: Set Theory, The Ghost In The Machine
  • Re: Set Theory, Bob Kolker
  • Re: Set Theory, Aatu Koskensilta
  • Re: Set Theory, Michael Press
• The Final Theory Of Everything V4.0, virtualadepts
  • Re: The Final Theory Of Everything V4.0, Dirk Van de moortel
• Abstract Algebra, Shama
  • Re: Abstract Algebra, Paul Sperry
• algebra problem, Shama
  • Re: algebra problem, José Carlos Santos
  • Re: algebra problem,
• Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, adomplayer
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, James Dolan
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, W. Dale Hall
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Tonico
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, A N Niel
    • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Proginoskes
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, Dave Rusin
  • Re: Why are finite groups so much of math curriculum?, zzbunker@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• ? least square soln, Cheng Cosine
  • Re: ? least square soln, Zdislav V. Kovarik
• Dumb Stat Question, dwight . thieme
  • Re: Dumb Stat Question, samy_mmp
    • Re: Dumb Stat Question, dwight . thieme
  • Re: Dumb Stat Question, Dave Seaman
    • Re: Dumb Stat Question, FreeToChoose
• splitting, Peter
  • Re: splitting,
    • Re: splitting, Peter
      • Re: splitting, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro
      • Re: splitting, Peter
      • Re: splitting, Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro
      • Re: splitting, Peter
    • Re: splitting, Peter
      • Re: splitting, Gerry Myerson
• Re: Euler's Bridges, T.H. Ray
• hy guys can You help me with something?, BoneS
  • Re: hy guys can You help me with something?, G.E. Ivey
• Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, Jose Capco
  • Re: Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, fernando revilla
    • Re: Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, Jose Capco
      • Message not available
      • Re: Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, Jose Capco
      • Re: Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, fernando revilla
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Almost Hilbert 17th Problem, Jose Capco
• slm, fikret
  • Re: slm, Phil Carmody
• GARCH based Value at Risk, mikefin
• greatest diameter of a perependicular, markww
  • Re: greatest diameter of a perependicular, Narasimham
    • Re: greatest diameter of a perependicular, markww
      • Re: greatest diameter of a perependicular, Narasimham
• On Cardinality of certain sets, XaoS
  • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, Bob Kolker
  • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, G.E. Ivey
    • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, XaoS
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • On Cardinality of certain sets, XaoS
    • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, William Elliot
    • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, mathman
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, William Elliot
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, Denis Feldmann
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, William Elliot
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, William Elliot
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, David C . Ullrich
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, Aatu Koskensilta
      • Re: On Cardinality of certain sets, Butch Malahide
• y^2 = f(x), f(x) a quintic or higher function, titus_piezas
  • Re: y^2 = f(x), f(x) a quintic or higher function, Gene Ward Smith
    • Re: y^2 = f(x), f(x) a quintic or higher function, titus_piezas
      • Re: y^2 = f(x), f(x) a quintic or higher function, Gene Ward Smith
• Is this proof valid?, John Mckenzie
  • Re: Is this proof valid?, Ulysse from CH
    • Re: Is this proof valid?, John Mckenzie
• negative reciprocal, easy, markww
  • Re: negative reciprocal, easy, Proginoskes
    • Re: negative reciprocal, easy, markww
      • Re: negative reciprocal, easy, Proginoskes
      • Re: negative reciprocal, easy, markww
• regarding partial proofs of twin prime conjecture, vfunc
• probability density function of partition function, peter . krawitz
• Converting equations from summation to integral forms., Golden Boar
  • Re: Circumference of ellipse using integration, Golden Boar
    • Re: Circumference of ellipse using integration, Badger
      • Re: Circumference of ellipse using integration, Golden Boar
      • Re: Circumference of ellipse using integration, Badger
    • Re: Circumference of ellipse using integration, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• sort data, mikefin
  • Re: sort data, Proginoskes
    • Re: sort data, James Waldby
      • Re: sort data, Proginoskes
• Re: Any coordinate system in GR?, S. J. Crothers
• Characterization, I dentification and Definition, zuhair
  • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, MoeBlee
    • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, zuhair
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, Virgil
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, MoeBlee
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, zuhair
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, Virgil
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, zuhair
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, Virgil
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, zuhair
      • Re: Characterization, I dentification and Definition, Virgil
• When Spheres meet, lal_al
  • Re: When Spheres meet, Ulysse from CH
    • Re: When Spheres meet, lal_al
      • Re: When Spheres meet, Ulysse from CH
      • Re: When Spheres meet, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
  • Re: When Spheres meet, Noland
  • Re: When Spheres meet, Ioannis
    • Re: When Spheres meet, Hero
      • Re: When Spheres meet, Ioannis
      • Re: When Spheres meet, Hero
• Union of increasing fields, NiceProbabilist
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Union of increasing fields, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Union of increasing fields, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Union of increasing fields, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, Snis Pilbor
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, Herman Rubin
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, mysastutor
  • Re: Union of increasing fields, NiceProbabilist
• Permutations and combinations, HSalim
  • Re: Permutations and combinations, Dirk Van de moortel
    • Re: Permutations and combinations, HSalim
  • Re: Permutations and combinations, Proginoskes
    • Re: Permutations and combinations, HSalim
      • Re: Permutations and combinations, Proginoskes
• Re: Mathieu Group M12, PaulHjelmstad
  • Re: Mathieu Group M12,
• I want a start, faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I want a start, Bart Goddard
  • Re: I want a start, Ioannis
    • Re: I want a start, faizankhan666@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: I want a start, Nobody
  • Re: I want a start, Phil Carmody
  • Re: I want a start, CDPSS
  • Re: I want a start, Gib Bogle
• Re: JSH: What if? Academic nightmare supposition, G.E. Ivey
  • Re: JSH: What if? Academic nightmare supposition, Arturo Magidin
• Sort the data of a moving window, mikefin
• To which field does this belong?, sol . hari
  • Re: To which field does this belong?, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: To which field does this belong?, Randy Poe
  • Re: To which field does this belong?, sol . hari
  • Re: To which field does this belong?, Doug Chatham
  • Re: To which field does this belong?, Duncan Muirhead
    • Re: To which field does this belong?, kunzmilan
• For all c > 0, exits p in (n, (1+c)n) for every n > n_0, xancorreu
• power of conic, Narasimham
  • Re: power of conic, Robert Israel
  • Re: power of conic, Narasimham
    • Re: power of conic, Narasimham
• book, new scientist
  • Re: book, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: book, Dave L. Renfro
  • Re: book, Gib Bogle
  • Re: book, David Ames
• the lowest number of comparisons in string matching, laura
• commutative algebra, Pierre-Yves Gaillard
• Numerical Methods, lija gunaseelan
• problem of analytical geometry 2D, fisica sanitaria Terni
  • Re: problem of analytical geometry 2D, Narasimham
  • Re: problem of analytical geometry 2D, Narasimham
  • Re: problem of analytical geometry 2D, Narasimham
• A definition please..., Stew Dent
  • Re: A definition please..., Bob Kolker
  • Re: A definition please..., W. Dale Hall
  • Re: A definition please..., Jannick Asmus
• Numerical Method, lija gunaseelan
• Measurable function in real analysis, lija gunaseelan
  • Re: Measurable function in real analysis, José Carlos Santos
    • Re: Measurable function in real analysis, alainverghote@xxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Measurable function in real analysis, lija gunaseelan
    • Re: Measurable function in real analysis, mathman
      • Re: Measurable function in real analysis, lija gunaseelan
• UPS efficiencies, Shay
  • Re: UPS efficiencies, Michael Stemper
• Re: A Particular Solution Of The O.D.E. y'' + Sy = 0 for S = S(x), symphony
• Derive it If u Can, aviralsangal@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Derive it If u Can, anon5874
    • Re: Derive it If u Can, Proginoskes
    • Re: Derive it If u Can, astanoff
• Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90%, Usher73
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90%, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
  • Re: Top 1% OWNS MORE THAN bottom 90%, The poster formerly known as Colleyville Alan
• Group with order p(p+1), rsvirk
  • Re: Group with order p(p+1), Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Group with order p(p+1), rsvirk
      • Re: Group with order p(p+1), Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Group with order p(p+1), Jyrki Lahtonen
    • Re: Group with order p(p+1),
      • Re: Group with order p(p+1), Jyrki Lahtonen
• differentiation of absolute cosine function, tricard
  • Re: differentiation of absolute cosine function, A N Niel
• quick and simple question, beginner
  • Re: quick and simple question, Robert Israel
    • Re: quick and simple question, beginner
  • Re: quick and simple question, Stephen J. Herschkorn
• Stupid Math Joke, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
  • Re: Stupid Math Joke, Rainer Rosenthal
    • Re: Stupid Math Joke, Ronald Bruck
      • Re: Stupid Math Joke, Rainer Rosenthal
• Re: Big Bang's Afterglow Fails an Intergalactic Shadow Test, S. J. Crothers
• An integral inequality, TCL
  • Re: An integral inequality, TCL
  • Re: An integral inequality, Robert Israel
    • Re: An integral inequality, david petry
      • Re: An integral inequality, Robert Israel
  • Re: An integral inequality, G. A. Edgar
• Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, rhaazy
  • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
    • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, rhaazy
      • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, rhaazy
      • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: Prove this statement for non-negative integers:, Peter L. Montgomery
• algebraic numbers, Peter
  • Re: algebraic numbers, David Sevilla
• Q: Simple system of equations question, laniik
  • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, Gerry Myerson
    • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, laniik
      • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, laniik
      • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, sasmith
    • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, laniik
    • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, Gerry Myerson
  • Re: Q: Simple system of equations question, Dave Rusin
• Question about Cartesian products, agapito6314
  • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Virgil
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, agapito6314
      • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Aatu Koskensilta
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, fernando revilla
  • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Jules
  • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Dave L. Renfro
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, agapito6314
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Stephen J. Herschkorn
      • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Dave L. Renfro
      • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Lee Rudolph
      • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Stephen J. Herschkorn
  • Re: Question about Cartesian products, Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
    • Re: Question about Cartesian products, agapito6314
• Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, John Mckenzie
  • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, Ioannis
    • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, Chip Eastham
    • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
      • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, Ioannis
  • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, John Mckenzie
  • Re: Does the fixed point iteration algorithm require |g'(x)| < 1?, Stephen Montgomery-Smith
• How to compute Galois groups of reducible polynomials?, David Sevilla
• I suck at proofs...., rhaazy
  • Re: I suck at proofs...., Arturo Magidin
  • Re: I suck at proofs...., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
  • Re: I suck at proofs...., Gib Bogle
    • Re: I suck at proofs...., rhaazy
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., Gib Bogle
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., rhaazy
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., David C . Ullrich
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., rhaazy
      • Re: I suck at proofs...., Gib Bogle
• 3x3 matrix question,, vsgdp
  • Re: 3x3 matrix question,, Jannick Asmus
    • Re: 3x3 matrix question,, vsgdp
• Project 3d point to 3d line, Skip
  • Re: Project 3d point to 3d line, Randy Poe
    • Re: Project 3d point to 3d line, Skip
      • Re: Project 3d point to 3d line, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
      • Re: Project 3d point to 3d line, [Mr.] Lynn Kurtz
• How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, rhaazy
  • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, Arturo Magidin
  • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, jestingrabbit
    • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, Dave Seaman
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, rhaazy
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, Chip Eastham
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, rhaazy
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, jestingrabbit
      • Re: How do I calculate the cardinality of power set?, Dave Seaman
• fields, Peter
  • Re: fields, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: fields, Peter
      • Re: fields, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: fields, Peter
      • Re: fields, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: fields,
• upper semicontinuous affine function as limit of decreasing sequence of continuous affine functions, HopfZ
• Vector Problem, SteveHarveyUK
  • Re: Vector Problem, Arturo Magidin
    • Re: Vector Problem, SteveHarveyUK
      • Re: Vector Problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Vector Problem, SteveHarveyUK
      • Re: Vector Problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Vector Problem, Arturo Magidin
      • Re: Vector Problem, Gerry Myerson
      • Re: Vector Problem, sttscitrans
• Continuous to Discrete Conversion for 3x3 State Space Array, Peter Nachtwey
  • Re: Continuous to Discrete Conversion for 3x3 State Space Array, Peter Nachtwey
    • Re: Continuous to Discrete Conversion for 3x3 State Space Array, Peter Nachtwey
• " A particular functional equation ", ala