Re: [] A graph theory terminology challenge
- From: "Proginoskes" <CCHeckman@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 1 Sep 2006 23:11:05 -0700
William Elliot wrote:
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Proginoskes wrote:
William Elliot wrote:I've already reported it and was ignored.
On Thu, 31 Aug 2006, Proginoskes wrote:
William Elliot wrote:When in advanced group serch, there is thread and there is also if you
Anyway when will Google fix the index into a thread?
look for it an index into the thread giving the author and listed in
threaded manner. You find a reply given by so&so in that index and open
it. Instead of going to that reply in the thread data, it goes to the
begining of the thread data file.
Okay; I know what you're talking about now. Yes, that is annoying.
If it ain't broke don't fix it.
They weren't broke but they fixed it when they went hypercommerical onto
the stock market. Just as I expected, Google began a slide. In fact I've
removed a book mark into google sci.math for it's uselessness. What's it
going to take to get them to fix it?
I don't know, but they did, in the past day or two. (I just used it in
the past few minutes to find recent replies to my posts, and the links
go directly to the individual post.)
--- Christopher Heckman
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [] A graph theory terminology challenge
- From: William Elliot
- Re: [] A graph theory terminology challenge
- Prev by Date: Re: A determininistic four-coloring algorithm.
- Next by Date: Re: a proof for consideration
- Previous by thread: algebra with finite field and isomorphic.
- Next by thread: Re: [] A graph theory terminology challenge
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
