Re: Randomness


Matt Zellman wrote:
are the following string of digits random?

Not likely.


0101000000000000000000000000000010000100100000000110001000000000

0000110110111110001010100010011100110011011011011001100110100110

1101110011101111010000001101011100000111101111111101000110100110

0000000000000000000000000100000000010000000001000000000000001000

1010110100111010011010100010011001100010011010010001100100100110

1010100111100001010110111101000100001000010100101001000001011100

here's a better question. Could the preceding six strings of digits
conceivably be randomly generated?

Sure.

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Randomness
    ... Matt Zellman wrote: ... The way the strings were generated is as follows: ... I started with the first however many digits of pi (a number whose ... the first sequence gives a 1 for every digit that is a 0 or 1 ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Randomness
    ... I suppose that was kind of a stupid question. ... Could the preceding six strings of digits ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: abundance of irrationals!)
    ... >> non-terminating strings of binary digits, ... > In order to form your antidiagonal number, you need too many digits. ... Any terminating sequence of binary digits can be arbitrarily extended ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >> Sure, given S symbols in L digits, you can represent exactly L^S ... If you are required to have infinite ... > strings in an infinite set of strings from a finite alphabet ... Individual naturals are all finite, but the set of all of them has no ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: infinity
    ... >>> Sure, given S symbols in L digits, you can represent exactly L^S ... If you are required to have infinite ... >> strings in an infinite set of strings from a finite alphabet ... if there is no finite bound on the lengths of the strings, ...
    (sci.math)