Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:13:49 GMT
In article <d0gjf25cn592eaing3h1iarl9mp42v73aj@xxxxxxx> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, 2 Sep 2006 02:59:46 GMT, "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>....
wrote:
The idea of being spherical due to gravity is a pretty good
dividing line. The other criteria are somewhat arbitrary.
Pluto was not discovered as a planet because of its size or shape.
Nope. Just like Ceres, it was predicted. If Pluto gets planet status,
so should Ceres.
Ceres isn't a moon?
No. Ceres was discovered because Bode's law predicted that there would be
a planet between Earth and Mars. It was discovered in 1801 and considered
a planet until about 1860.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- References:
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- Prev by Date: Re: Randomness
- Next by Date: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Previous by thread: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Next by thread: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Index(es):