Re: The Forebears Paradox
- From: "Michael" <michael.greaney@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Sep 2006 04:55:35 -0700
Reading the posts to date, it appears that the problem lies in the way
I've defined incest too tightly, i.e. I've excluded the possiblity of
marrying a distant cousin. Such marriages might well have been more
frequent in the past when people didn't travel as often or as far as
they do today and consequently didn't have the contact with distant
communities to bring in fresh blood. Perhaps this is how racial
differences emerged. One could argue, then, that the existence of
different races proves the incest solution to the paradox (incest in
the loose sense of marrying distant cousins).
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Forebears Paradox
- From: Peter Webb
- Re: The Forebears Paradox
- From: Michael Orion
- Re: The Forebears Paradox
- References:
- The Forebears Paradox
- From: Michael
- Re: The Forebears Paradox
- From: Randy Poe
- The Forebears Paradox
- Prev by Date: Re: GOLDBACH Conjecture - Some news on X = 0 (6)
- Next by Date: Re: Applied stochastic modeling: q's on convergence of discretization approaches
- Previous by thread: Re: The Forebears Paradox
- Next by thread: Re: The Forebears Paradox
- Index(es):