Re: Am I a crank?
- From: "David R Tribble" <david@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 3 Sep 2006 08:08:00 -0700
Virgil wrote:
Since Zick implies above that HE can tell us how big "infinity" is, why
doesn't just he do it, or get off the pot.
Lester Zick wrote:
I already have just done it in reply to Tribble. Don't blame me if you
can't keep up with traffic.
Ah, yes, that "infinity is equal to the number of infinitesimals".
Which must be interesting, except that you haven't defined
"infinitesimal". You also seem to have overlooked the fact that
infinitesimals don't exist in standard arithmetic, which implies,
if your definition is correct, that infinity does not exist in standard
arithmetic.
Perhaps you could provide us with that crucial definition?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- References:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Manny Feld
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- Prev by Date: Re: Randomness
- Next by Date: Re: Possible textbook error: fixed point functional iteration limit proof
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Index(es):