Re: Topology -> Torsion???
- From: lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph)
- Date: 3 Sep 2006 18:18:20 -0400
"Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
In <ed93mi$59r$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, on 09/01/2006
at 06:57 AM, lrudolph@xxxxxxxxx (Lee Rudolph) said:
Having, as I do, an Ash number of 1, I will take it up
with the authors. Personally I don't believe that that's the
etymology; it seems much more likely to me (absent any actual
*evidence*) that when Betti, or whoever, first used the word
"torsion" (or a cognate) to refer to what we would now call an
element of finite order in a homology group, the image was merely
that of rolling something up tightly--sort of the same image that's
present in "cyclic".
Any connection <g> to the term torsion as applied to a connection?
I really doubt it. That seems to me to relate to the torsion of a
space curve, which really *is* twisting in a straightforward sense.
Lee Rudolph
.
- References:
- Topology -> Torsion???
- From: David C . Ullrich
- Re: Topology -> Torsion???
- From: Lee Rudolph
- Re: Topology -> Torsion???
- From: Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz
- Topology -> Torsion???
- Prev by Date: Re: Geometry: No four vectors can be pairwise at an right angle to each other
- Next by Date: Re: Topology question...
- Previous by thread: Re: Topology -> Torsion???
- Next by thread: Re: Topology -> Torsion???
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|