Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 00:30:39 GMT
In article <mk0mf2pm5mg8ap9m6ifar4ctmk07g23rhq@xxxxxxx> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 01:19:53 GMT, "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
wrote:
In article <r33kf2pjadg6pjo8o11at7pkpn86f6iekc@xxxxxxx> Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 15:11:53 -0500, Manny Feld
<Manny.Feldl@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
Ceres isn't a moon?
Asteroid.
Does it cause isolatable perturbations in the orbits of the other nine
planets?
Does Pluto do that for the other eight planets?
It did for Neptune I believe. That's how and why it was discovered as
a planet in the first place.
So your requirement for "isolatable perturbations in the orbits of the other
nine planets" is nonsense? Isolatable perturbations in the orbit of a
single other planet is sufficient?
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- References:
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Justice For Pluto
- Prev by Date: Re: Randomness
- Next by Date: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Previous by thread: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Next by thread: Re: Justice For Pluto
- Index(es):