Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:14:51 -0700
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 23:51:23 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <qbamf2pm9e5q8bhlk3p5632mj51jo3jqbi@xxxxxxx>,
Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 11:31:33 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <gk1mf2hbguko7fga1qekpq3vmtc2g2qe2b@xxxxxxx>,
Lester Zick <dontbother@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sat, 02 Sep 2006 17:23:40 -0600, Virgil <virgil@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Lester Zick wrote:
Mechanically "infinity" just refers to the number of infinitessimals.Lester Zick wrote:
infinity contains finite numbers.
As neither of these is a satisfactory definition of infinity, Zick
has not defined "infinity" satisfactorily.
I daresay to a grammarian it wouldn't appear so.
Nor to anyone else of sense.
Nor to anyone senseless.
Zick is, of course, speaking for himself, as he can't speak for anyone
else.
I can certainly speak for all allegedly unarmed opponents who are
allegedly armed.
~v~~
.
- References:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Manny Feld
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Lester Zick
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Virgil
- Re: Am I a crank?
- Prev by Date: Re: [] A graph theory terminology challenge
- Next by Date: Re: GOLDBACH Conjecture - Some news on X = 0 (6)
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
