Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- From: magidin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Arturo Magidin)
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 15:05:26 +0000 (UTC)
In article <1157467811.267002.47890@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
<agapito6314@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi, I have seen 2 types of objections by those who question the AC:
1.- It is a "pure existence" statement, that is it tells something
exists but not what it is. Is math not full of these kinds of
statements?
Aatu has given a far better answer to this than I could ever hope to...
2.- Some of its implications are weird or counterintuitive. Can
someone please explain some of these?
Counterintuitive depends on your intuition... But among two "typical"
examples:
(i) The well-ordering principle; in particular, the conclusion that
the real numbers can be well ordered.
(ii) The Banach-Tarski Paradox (which is also a theorem): there is a
way to partition the unit sphere into a finite number of parts,
and then to take those parts, and reassemble them (without
changing their shape or even reflecting them) into two unit
spheres (or into a sphere of radius 2).
--
======================================================================
"It's not denial. I'm just very selective about
what I accept as reality."
--- Calvin ("Calvin and Hobbes" by Bill Watterson)
======================================================================
Arturo Magidin
magidin-at-member-ams-org
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- From: Peter Webb
- Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- References:
- Questions about Axiom of Choice
- From: agapito6314
- Questions about Axiom of Choice
- Prev by Date: Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- Next by Date: Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- Previous by thread: Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- Next by thread: Re: Questions about Axiom of Choice
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|