Re: prime theorems
- From: "Ignacio Larrosa Caņestro" <ilarrosaQUITARMAYUSCULAS@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 5 Sep 2006 20:10:03 +0200
En el mensaje:1157445448.707912.212160@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
arunloboforever@xxxxxxxxx <arunloboforever@xxxxxxxxx> escribió:
Well yeah.I had written it in a hurry. And thats false now. please
check this: if a is an odd prime, 1+a^2+a^4+a^6+....a^4k has a prime
factor greater than a. a is a prime of the form 4j+1.
Your wording is really obscure ... The statement "a is a prime of the form
4j+1", ¿is the thesis or the hypothesis part of your claim?
If it is the hypothesis, consider k = 1, a = 373:
1 + 373^2 + 373^4 = 3*7^2*13*19*67*73*109
If it is the thesis .... Consider k = 1, a = 3
--
Best regards,
Ignacio Larrosa Cañestro
A Coruña (España)
ilarrosaQUITARMAYUSCULAS@xxxxxxxxxxx
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: prime theorems
- From: arunloboforever
- Re: prime theorems
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Think of these numbers!!
- Previous by thread: Re: prime theorems
- Next by thread: Re: prime theorems
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
