Re: Fundamental flaw

Dave L. Renfro wrote:

Why mathematicians? This sounds like something an astronomer
should be concerned with, not a mathematician (or a biologist,
or a chemist, or a dentist, etc.).

oriel36 wrote (in part):

It is such a complicated thing and especially when a
mathematician like Newton puts words in the mouth of an
astronomer such as kepler.

I fail to see how this is relevant to the present era.
Can you name one mathematician alive today for whom
what you are posting about is relevant to their research?
So that we'll know the person you name is real, pick
someone who is listed at The Mathematics Genealogy
Project web pages.

Dave L. Renfro

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Distinct linear orderings on Z
    ... Dave Rusin said: ... > mathematician then because in my world, ... >>proportional to the size of that infinity, or density of saturation of the real ... It may take some time to make sense of what he is saying, ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Finding a diagonal of a box
    ... Dave L. Renfro wrote: ... >>> don't have time to become a mathematician. ... don't have time for judgemental people saying blah..blah.. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: Fundamental flaw
    ... Dave L. Renfro wrote: ... should be concerned with, not a mathematician (or a biologist, ... I fail to see how this is relevant to the present era. ...
    (sci.math)
  • Re: No come back for Lance
    ... >You underestimate the eternal beauty of that thin blue line..... ... I'm a mathematician -- the lines I ponder have no width at all! ...
    (rec.sport.swimming)
  • Re: Mathematicians in dark rooms
    ... Dave L. Renfro wrote: ... "A mathematician is a blind man in a dark room looking ... Fort says the quote has been attributed to Charles Darwin, ...
    (sci.math)
Quantcast