Re: Am I a crank?
- From: "*** T. Winter" <***.Winter@xxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 6 Sep 2006 01:06:57 GMT
In article <tMfLg.4871$9c3.4603@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Aatu Koskensilta <aatu.koskensilta@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
*** T. Winter wrote:
Mathematicians do not claim axioms to be either true or false.
So you would balk at asserting that it's true that whatever mathematical
property P is we have that
if P(0) and for every natural n, P(n) implies P(n+1), then for every
natural n, P(n)
is true, for example?
Only if you accept the axiom of induction. If you do not accept that axiom
it is probably false. There is no *a priori* reason to either accept or
reject it.
--
*** t. winter, cwi, kruislaan 413, 1098 sj amsterdam, nederland, +31205924131
home: bovenover 215, 1025 jn amsterdam, nederland; http://www.cwi.nl/~***/
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Am I a crank?
- References:
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: *** T. Winter
- Re: Am I a crank?
- From: Aatu Koskensilta
- Re: Am I a crank?
- Prev by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Next by Date: Re: An uncountable countable set
- Previous by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Next by thread: Re: Am I a crank?
- Index(es):