Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- From: "mina_world" <mina_world@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2006 19:41:14 +0900
"William Elliot" <marsh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Pine.BSI.4.58.0609102041000.18881@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 11 Sep 2006, mina_world wrote:
i know that Q is a field of quotients of Z.
for a pair (4,6) of Z,
No. (4,6) in Z^2
we can't say that (4,6) is a element of "field of quotients of Z".Indeed, it's defined as [ (4,6) ] or equivalently as [ (2,3) ]
we can say that equivalent pair [(4,6)] is a element of
"field of quotients of Z".
so, (4,6) is not a element of "field of quotients of Z".
but, it is fact that 4/6 is a element of Q.
or [ (8,12) ]. So what's new? 4/6 = 2/3 = 8/12 ? ;-)
i think....
if Q' only contain irreducible fractions,
we can say that Q' is a field of quotients of Z.
is this a foolish thinking ?
Yes. [ (4,6) ] = [ (2,3) ]. So where is irreducible?
Just as with fractions 4/6 = 2/3, where is irreducible?
Irreducible isn't in the rationals, it's in the representation
of the quotient class or in the representation of the fraction.
Let q = n/m be a rational with coprime n and m.
q then is representated as an irreducible fraction.
q = 2n/2m isn't representated as an irreducible fraction
even tho it's the same number.
if (4,6) = [(4,6)], my thinking is needless.
but it's false.
it's true that (4,6) in [(4,6)].
if we say that Q is a field of quotients of Z,
4/6 is a element of "field of quotients of Z".
but it's false.
if [4/6] = {x | x = 2/3}={2/3, 4/6, 6/9,.....},
it's true that [4/6] is a element of "field of quotients of Z".
thus, if (4,6) = [(4,6)], my thinking is needless.
but it's false.
how do you think about it ?
i need your advice.
because, sci-math's members are genius.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- From: William Elliot
- Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- References:
- algebra with field of quotients.
- From: mina_world
- Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- From: William Elliot
- algebra with field of quotients.
- Prev by Date: Re: Matrix rank code
- Next by Date: Re: Evaluation of expression with connected summations
- Previous by thread: Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- Next by thread: Re: algebra with field of quotients.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|