Re: polar and cartesian
- From: israel@xxxxxxxxxxx (Robert Israel)
- Date: 12 Sep 2006 04:54:24 GMT
In article <1158034018.049981.21010@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
vicky <vikash.vks123@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Friends
As we knowrelation between poler and cartesian co-ordinates are
x=r*cos(t) -------(1) // sorry i
use t for angle theta//
Nothing to be sorry for...
y=r*sin(t) --------(2)
r ^2= x^2+y^2 -------(3)
t= tan^-1(y/x) -------(4)
No, you can take t = arctan(y/x) if x > 0, but if x < 0 you want
arctan(y/x) (+/-) pi (depending on which interval you want it to be in),
and if x = 0 the arctan is undefined.
By equation (1) x_r = cos(t) ----(5)
OK, if _r means partial derivative wrt r (keeping t constant).
By equation (3) differentiating w.r.to r we get
x_r= sec(t) -------(6)
"We" don't. The partial derivative of (3) wrt r (keeping t
constant) is
2 r = 2 x x_r + 2 y y_r
= 2 r cos(t) x_r + 2 r sin(t) y_r
Robert Israel israel@xxxxxxxxxxx
Department of Mathematics http://www.math.ubc.ca/~israel
University of British Columbia Vancouver, BC, Canada
.
- References:
- polar and cartesian
- From: vicky
- polar and cartesian
- Prev by Date: Re: some interview questions
- Next by Date: Re: a proof for consideration
- Previous by thread: Re: polar and cartesian
- Next by thread: Euler-Lagrange for summation of integrations
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|